Cargando…

Psychometric Validation of the Korean Version of Structured Interview for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (K-SIP)

For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Won, Kim, Daeho, Seo, Ho-Jun, Lee, Sang-Yeol, Ryu, Seung-Ho, Kim, Jung-Bum, Chung, Moon Yong, Koo, Young Jin, Ryu, Seong Gon, Kim, Eui Jung, Kim, Tae-Suk, Lim, Hyun-Kook, Woo, Jong-Min, Chae, Jeong-Ho
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.26
Descripción
Sumario:For diagnosis and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the easily administered assessment tool is essential. Structured Interview for PTSD (SIP) is a validated, 17-item, simple measurement being used widely. We aimed to develop the Korean version of SIP (K-SIP) and investigated its psychometric properties. Ninety-three subjects with PTSD, 73 subjects with mood disorder or anxiety disorder as a psychiatric control group, and 88 subjects as a healthy control group were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed psychometric assessments that included the K-SIP, the Korean versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and other assessment tools. The K-SIP presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92) and test-retest reliability (r=0.87). K-SIP showed strong correlations with CAPS (r=0.72). Among three groups including PTSD patients, psychiatric controls, and normal controls, there were significant differences in the K-SIP total score. The potential cut-off total score of K-SIP was 20 with highest diagnostic efficiency (91.9%). At this point, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 88.4%, respectively. Our result showed that K-SIP had good reliability and validity. We expect that K-SIP will be used as a simple but structured instrument for assessment of PTSD.