Cargando…

Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?

BACKGROUND: Medical specialists are often seen as the first prescribers of new drugs. However, the extent to which specialists influence new drug prescribing in primary care is largely unknown. METHODS: This study estimates the influence of medical specialists on new drug prescribing in primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Florentinus, Stefan R, Heerdink, Eibert R, van Dijk, Liset, Griens, AMG Fabiënne, Groenewegen, Peter P, Leufkens, Hubert GM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19134223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-6
_version_ 1782165140561461248
author Florentinus, Stefan R
Heerdink, Eibert R
van Dijk, Liset
Griens, AMG Fabiënne
Groenewegen, Peter P
Leufkens, Hubert GM
author_facet Florentinus, Stefan R
Heerdink, Eibert R
van Dijk, Liset
Griens, AMG Fabiënne
Groenewegen, Peter P
Leufkens, Hubert GM
author_sort Florentinus, Stefan R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical specialists are often seen as the first prescribers of new drugs. However, the extent to which specialists influence new drug prescribing in primary care is largely unknown. METHODS: This study estimates the influence of medical specialists on new drug prescribing in primary care shortly after market introduction. The influence of medical specialists on prescribing of five new drugs was measured in a cohort of 103 GPs, working in 59 practices, over the period 1999 until 2003. The influence of medical specialists on new drug prescribing in primary care was assessed using three outcome measures. Firstly, the proportion of patients receiving their first prescription for a new or reference drug from a specialist. Secondly, the proportion of GPs prescribing new drugs before any specialist prescribes to their patients. Thirdly, we compared the time until the GP's first own prescribing between GPs who waited for prescriptions from specialists and those who did not. RESULTS: The influence of specialists showed considerable differences among the new drugs studied. The proportion of patients receiving their first prescription from a specialist was greatest for the combination salmeterol/fluticasone (60.2%), and lowest for rofecoxib (23.0%). The proportion of GPs prescribing new drugs before waiting for prescriptions from medical specialists ranged from 21.1% in the case of esomeprazole to 32.9% for rofecoxib. Prescribing new drugs by specialists did not shorten the GP's own time to prescribing. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the influence of medical specialists is clearly visible for all new drugs and often greater than for the existing older drugs, but the rapid uptake of new drugs in primary care does not seem specialist induced in all cases. GPs are responsible for a substantial amount of all early prescriptions for new drugs and for a subpopulation specialist endorsement is not a requisite to initiate in new drug prescribing. This contradicts with the idea that the diffusion of newly marketed drugs always follows a two-step model, with medical specialists as the innovators and GPs as the followers.
format Text
id pubmed-2651136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26511362009-03-05 Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced? Florentinus, Stefan R Heerdink, Eibert R van Dijk, Liset Griens, AMG Fabiënne Groenewegen, Peter P Leufkens, Hubert GM BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical specialists are often seen as the first prescribers of new drugs. However, the extent to which specialists influence new drug prescribing in primary care is largely unknown. METHODS: This study estimates the influence of medical specialists on new drug prescribing in primary care shortly after market introduction. The influence of medical specialists on prescribing of five new drugs was measured in a cohort of 103 GPs, working in 59 practices, over the period 1999 until 2003. The influence of medical specialists on new drug prescribing in primary care was assessed using three outcome measures. Firstly, the proportion of patients receiving their first prescription for a new or reference drug from a specialist. Secondly, the proportion of GPs prescribing new drugs before any specialist prescribes to their patients. Thirdly, we compared the time until the GP's first own prescribing between GPs who waited for prescriptions from specialists and those who did not. RESULTS: The influence of specialists showed considerable differences among the new drugs studied. The proportion of patients receiving their first prescription from a specialist was greatest for the combination salmeterol/fluticasone (60.2%), and lowest for rofecoxib (23.0%). The proportion of GPs prescribing new drugs before waiting for prescriptions from medical specialists ranged from 21.1% in the case of esomeprazole to 32.9% for rofecoxib. Prescribing new drugs by specialists did not shorten the GP's own time to prescribing. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the influence of medical specialists is clearly visible for all new drugs and often greater than for the existing older drugs, but the rapid uptake of new drugs in primary care does not seem specialist induced in all cases. GPs are responsible for a substantial amount of all early prescriptions for new drugs and for a subpopulation specialist endorsement is not a requisite to initiate in new drug prescribing. This contradicts with the idea that the diffusion of newly marketed drugs always follows a two-step model, with medical specialists as the innovators and GPs as the followers. BioMed Central 2009-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2651136/ /pubmed/19134223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-6 Text en Copyright © 2009 Florentinus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Florentinus, Stefan R
Heerdink, Eibert R
van Dijk, Liset
Griens, AMG Fabiënne
Groenewegen, Peter P
Leufkens, Hubert GM
Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title_full Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title_fullStr Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title_full_unstemmed Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title_short Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
title_sort is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19134223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-6
work_keys_str_mv AT florentinusstefanr isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced
AT heerdinkeibertr isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced
AT vandijkliset isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced
AT griensamgfabienne isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced
AT groenewegenpeterp isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced
AT leufkenshubertgm isnewdrugprescribinginprimarycarespecialistinduced