Cargando…

Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections

BACKGROUND: In situ hybridisation (ISH) combined with autoradiography is a standard method of measuring the amount of gene expression in histological sections, but the methods used to quantify gene expression in the resulting digital images vary greatly between studies and can potentially give confl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lazic, Stanley E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19146702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-5
_version_ 1782165146017202176
author Lazic, Stanley E
author_facet Lazic, Stanley E
author_sort Lazic, Stanley E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In situ hybridisation (ISH) combined with autoradiography is a standard method of measuring the amount of gene expression in histological sections, but the methods used to quantify gene expression in the resulting digital images vary greatly between studies and can potentially give conflicting results. RESULTS: The present study examines commonly used methods for analysing ISH images and demonstrates that these methods are not optimal. Image segmentation based on thresholding can be subject to floor-effects and lead to biased results. In addition, including the area of the structure or region of interest in the calculation of gene expression can lead to a large loss of precision and can also introduce bias. Finally, converting grey level pixel intensities to optical densities or units of radioactivity is unnecessary for most applications and can lead to data with poor statistical properties. A modification of an existing method for selecting the structure or region of interest is introduced which performs better than alternative methods in terms of bias and precision. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, suggestions are made to reduce bias, increase precision, and ultimately provide more meaningful results of gene expression data.
format Text
id pubmed-2651176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26511762009-03-05 Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections Lazic, Stanley E BMC Neurosci Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In situ hybridisation (ISH) combined with autoradiography is a standard method of measuring the amount of gene expression in histological sections, but the methods used to quantify gene expression in the resulting digital images vary greatly between studies and can potentially give conflicting results. RESULTS: The present study examines commonly used methods for analysing ISH images and demonstrates that these methods are not optimal. Image segmentation based on thresholding can be subject to floor-effects and lead to biased results. In addition, including the area of the structure or region of interest in the calculation of gene expression can lead to a large loss of precision and can also introduce bias. Finally, converting grey level pixel intensities to optical densities or units of radioactivity is unnecessary for most applications and can lead to data with poor statistical properties. A modification of an existing method for selecting the structure or region of interest is introduced which performs better than alternative methods in terms of bias and precision. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, suggestions are made to reduce bias, increase precision, and ultimately provide more meaningful results of gene expression data. BioMed Central 2009-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2651176/ /pubmed/19146702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lazic; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Lazic, Stanley E
Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title_full Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title_fullStr Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title_full_unstemmed Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title_short Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
title_sort statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19146702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lazicstanleye statisticalevaluationofmethodsforquantifyinggeneexpressionbyautoradiographyinhistologicalsections