Cargando…

In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalra, Mannudeep K., Dang, Pragya, Singh, Sarabjeet, Saini, Sanjay, Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156
_version_ 1782165150752571392
author Kalra, Mannudeep K.
Dang, Pragya
Singh, Sarabjeet
Saini, Sanjay
Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
author_facet Kalra, Mannudeep K.
Dang, Pragya
Singh, Sarabjeet
Saini, Sanjay
Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
author_sort Kalra, Mannudeep K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with the center of the phantom aligned to the gantry isocenter. Scanning was repeated after placing a bismuth breast shield on the anterior surface with no gap and with 1, 2, and 6 cm of padding between the shield and the phantom surface. The "shielded" phantom was also scanned with combined modulation and off-centering of the phantom at 2 cm, 4 cm and 6 cm below the gantry isocenter. CT numbers, noise, and surface radiation dose were measured. The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: The in-plane shield was not associated with any significant increment for the surface dose or CT dose index volume, which was achieved by comparing the radiation dose measured by combined modulation technique to the fixed mAs (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the gap or the surface CT numbers, surface noise increased to a larger extent compared to Hounsfield unit (HU) (0-6 cm, 26-55%) and noise (0-6 cm, 30-40%) in the center. With off-centering, in-plane shielding devices are associated with less dose savings, although dose reduction was still higher than in the absence of shielding (0 cm off-center, 90% dose reduction; 2 cm, 61%) (p < 0.0001). Streak artifacts were noted at 0 cm and 1 cm gaps but not at 2 cm and 6 cm gaps of shielding to the surface distances. CONCLUSION: In-plane shields are associated with greater image noise, artifactually increased attenuation values, and streak artifacts. However, shields reduce radiation dose regardless of the extent of off-centering. Automatic exposure control did not increase radiation dose when using a shield.
format Text
id pubmed-2651436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26514362009-03-06 In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dang, Pragya Singh, Sarabjeet Saini, Sanjay Shepard, Jo-Anne O. Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with the center of the phantom aligned to the gantry isocenter. Scanning was repeated after placing a bismuth breast shield on the anterior surface with no gap and with 1, 2, and 6 cm of padding between the shield and the phantom surface. The "shielded" phantom was also scanned with combined modulation and off-centering of the phantom at 2 cm, 4 cm and 6 cm below the gantry isocenter. CT numbers, noise, and surface radiation dose were measured. The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: The in-plane shield was not associated with any significant increment for the surface dose or CT dose index volume, which was achieved by comparing the radiation dose measured by combined modulation technique to the fixed mAs (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the gap or the surface CT numbers, surface noise increased to a larger extent compared to Hounsfield unit (HU) (0-6 cm, 26-55%) and noise (0-6 cm, 30-40%) in the center. With off-centering, in-plane shielding devices are associated with less dose savings, although dose reduction was still higher than in the absence of shielding (0 cm off-center, 90% dose reduction; 2 cm, 61%) (p < 0.0001). Streak artifacts were noted at 0 cm and 1 cm gaps but not at 2 cm and 6 cm gaps of shielding to the surface distances. CONCLUSION: In-plane shields are associated with greater image noise, artifactually increased attenuation values, and streak artifacts. However, shields reduce radiation dose regardless of the extent of off-centering. Automatic exposure control did not increase radiation dose when using a shield. The Korean Society of Radiology 2009 2009-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2651436/ /pubmed/19270862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kalra, Mannudeep K.
Dang, Pragya
Singh, Sarabjeet
Saini, Sanjay
Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title_full In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title_fullStr In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title_full_unstemmed In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title_short In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
title_sort in-plane shielding for ct: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156
work_keys_str_mv AT kalramannudeepk inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance
AT dangpragya inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance
AT singhsarabjeet inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance
AT sainisanjay inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance
AT shepardjoanneo inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance