Cargando…
In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance
OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156 |
_version_ | 1782165150752571392 |
---|---|
author | Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dang, Pragya Singh, Sarabjeet Saini, Sanjay Shepard, Jo-Anne O. |
author_facet | Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dang, Pragya Singh, Sarabjeet Saini, Sanjay Shepard, Jo-Anne O. |
author_sort | Kalra, Mannudeep K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with the center of the phantom aligned to the gantry isocenter. Scanning was repeated after placing a bismuth breast shield on the anterior surface with no gap and with 1, 2, and 6 cm of padding between the shield and the phantom surface. The "shielded" phantom was also scanned with combined modulation and off-centering of the phantom at 2 cm, 4 cm and 6 cm below the gantry isocenter. CT numbers, noise, and surface radiation dose were measured. The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: The in-plane shield was not associated with any significant increment for the surface dose or CT dose index volume, which was achieved by comparing the radiation dose measured by combined modulation technique to the fixed mAs (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the gap or the surface CT numbers, surface noise increased to a larger extent compared to Hounsfield unit (HU) (0-6 cm, 26-55%) and noise (0-6 cm, 30-40%) in the center. With off-centering, in-plane shielding devices are associated with less dose savings, although dose reduction was still higher than in the absence of shielding (0 cm off-center, 90% dose reduction; 2 cm, 61%) (p < 0.0001). Streak artifacts were noted at 0 cm and 1 cm gaps but not at 2 cm and 6 cm gaps of shielding to the surface distances. CONCLUSION: In-plane shields are associated with greater image noise, artifactually increased attenuation values, and streak artifacts. However, shields reduce radiation dose regardless of the extent of off-centering. Automatic exposure control did not increase radiation dose when using a shield. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2651436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26514362009-03-06 In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dang, Pragya Singh, Sarabjeet Saini, Sanjay Shepard, Jo-Anne O. Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of off-centering, automatic exposure control, and padding on attenuation values, noise, and radiation dose when using in-plane bismuth-based shields for CT scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30 cm anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 64-multidetector CT, with the center of the phantom aligned to the gantry isocenter. Scanning was repeated after placing a bismuth breast shield on the anterior surface with no gap and with 1, 2, and 6 cm of padding between the shield and the phantom surface. The "shielded" phantom was also scanned with combined modulation and off-centering of the phantom at 2 cm, 4 cm and 6 cm below the gantry isocenter. CT numbers, noise, and surface radiation dose were measured. The data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: The in-plane shield was not associated with any significant increment for the surface dose or CT dose index volume, which was achieved by comparing the radiation dose measured by combined modulation technique to the fixed mAs (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the gap or the surface CT numbers, surface noise increased to a larger extent compared to Hounsfield unit (HU) (0-6 cm, 26-55%) and noise (0-6 cm, 30-40%) in the center. With off-centering, in-plane shielding devices are associated with less dose savings, although dose reduction was still higher than in the absence of shielding (0 cm off-center, 90% dose reduction; 2 cm, 61%) (p < 0.0001). Streak artifacts were noted at 0 cm and 1 cm gaps but not at 2 cm and 6 cm gaps of shielding to the surface distances. CONCLUSION: In-plane shields are associated with greater image noise, artifactually increased attenuation values, and streak artifacts. However, shields reduce radiation dose regardless of the extent of off-centering. Automatic exposure control did not increase radiation dose when using a shield. The Korean Society of Radiology 2009 2009-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2651436/ /pubmed/19270862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dang, Pragya Singh, Sarabjeet Saini, Sanjay Shepard, Jo-Anne O. In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title | In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title_full | In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title_fullStr | In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title_full_unstemmed | In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title_short | In-Plane Shielding for CT: Effect of Off-Centering, Automatic Exposure Control and Shield-to-Surface Distance |
title_sort | in-plane shielding for ct: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalramannudeepk inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance AT dangpragya inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance AT singhsarabjeet inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance AT sainisanjay inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance AT shepardjoanneo inplaneshieldingforcteffectofoffcenteringautomaticexposurecontrolandshieldtosurfacedistance |