Cargando…

Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis using data from a male circumcision randomised controlled trial. METHODS: We used data collected during the male circumcision trial conducted in Orange Farm (Sout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobngwi–Tambekou, J, Taljaard, D, Nieuwoudt, M, Lissouba, P, Puren, A, Auvert, B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.032334
_version_ 1782165212721315840
author Sobngwi–Tambekou, J
Taljaard, D
Nieuwoudt, M
Lissouba, P
Puren, A
Auvert, B
author_facet Sobngwi–Tambekou, J
Taljaard, D
Nieuwoudt, M
Lissouba, P
Puren, A
Auvert, B
author_sort Sobngwi–Tambekou, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis using data from a male circumcision randomised controlled trial. METHODS: We used data collected during the male circumcision trial conducted in Orange Farm (South Africa) among men aged 18–24 years. Altogether, 1767 urine samples collected during the final follow-up visit were analysed using PCR. Prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis and T vaginalis was assessed as a function of male circumcision using odds ratios (OR) given by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis and T vaginalis among intervention and control groups were 10.0% versus 10.3% (OR 0.97; p = 0.84), 2.1% versus 3.6% (OR 0.58; p = 0.065) and 1.7% versus 3.1% (OR 0.54; p = 0.062), respectively. The association between T vaginalis and male circumcision remained borderline when controlling for age, ethnic group, number of lifetime partners, marital status, condom use and HIV status (AOR 0.48; p = 0.069). In the as-treated analysis, this association became significant (OR 0.49, p = 0.030; AOR 0.41, p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that male circumcision reduces T vaginalis infection among men. This finding explains why women with circumcised partners are less at risk for T vaginalis infection than other women. The protective effect on T vaginalis is an additional argument to recommend male circumcision in Africa where it is acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00122525.
format Text
id pubmed-2652030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26520302009-04-01 Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention Sobngwi–Tambekou, J Taljaard, D Nieuwoudt, M Lissouba, P Puren, A Auvert, B Sex Transm Infect Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis using data from a male circumcision randomised controlled trial. METHODS: We used data collected during the male circumcision trial conducted in Orange Farm (South Africa) among men aged 18–24 years. Altogether, 1767 urine samples collected during the final follow-up visit were analysed using PCR. Prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis and T vaginalis was assessed as a function of male circumcision using odds ratios (OR) given by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis and T vaginalis among intervention and control groups were 10.0% versus 10.3% (OR 0.97; p = 0.84), 2.1% versus 3.6% (OR 0.58; p = 0.065) and 1.7% versus 3.1% (OR 0.54; p = 0.062), respectively. The association between T vaginalis and male circumcision remained borderline when controlling for age, ethnic group, number of lifetime partners, marital status, condom use and HIV status (AOR 0.48; p = 0.069). In the as-treated analysis, this association became significant (OR 0.49, p = 0.030; AOR 0.41, p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that male circumcision reduces T vaginalis infection among men. This finding explains why women with circumcised partners are less at risk for T vaginalis infection than other women. The protective effect on T vaginalis is an additional argument to recommend male circumcision in Africa where it is acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00122525. BMJ Publishing Group 2009-04 2008-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2652030/ /pubmed/19074928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.032334 Text en © Sobngwi–Tambekou et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Sobngwi–Tambekou, J
Taljaard, D
Nieuwoudt, M
Lissouba, P
Puren, A
Auvert, B
Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title_full Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title_fullStr Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title_full_unstemmed Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title_short Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention
title_sort male circumcision and neisseria gonorrhoeae, chlamydia trachomatis and trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for hiv prevention
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.032334
work_keys_str_mv AT sobngwitambekouj malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention
AT taljaardd malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention
AT nieuwoudtm malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention
AT lissoubap malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention
AT purena malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention
AT auvertb malecircumcisionandneisseriagonorrhoeaechlamydiatrachomatisandtrichomonasvaginalisobservationsafterarandomisedcontrolledtrialforhivprevention