Cargando…
Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus
[Image: see text] A sequential ordered substrate binding established previously for several DNA polymerases is generally extended to all DNA polymerases, and the characterization of novel polymerases is often based on the assumption that the enzymes should productively bind DNA substrate first, foll...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2008
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18598057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi800731m |
_version_ | 1782165226080174080 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Sandeep Bakhtina, Marina Tsai, Ming-Daw |
author_facet | Kumar, Sandeep Bakhtina, Marina Tsai, Ming-Daw |
author_sort | Kumar, Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] A sequential ordered substrate binding established previously for several DNA polymerases is generally extended to all DNA polymerases, and the characterization of novel polymerases is often based on the assumption that the enzymes should productively bind DNA substrate first, followed by template-directed dNTP binding. The comprehensive kinetic study of DNA polymerase X (Pol X) from African swine fever virus reported here is the first analysis of the substrate binding order performed for a low-fidelity DNA polymerase. A classical steady-state kinetic approach using substrate analogue inhibition assays demonstrates that Pol X does not follow the bi-bi ordered mechanism established for other DNA polymerases. Further, using isotope-trapping experiments and stopped-flow fluorescence assays, we show that Pol X can bind Mg(2+)·dNTPs in a productive manner in the absence of DNA substrate. We also show that DNA binding to Pol X, although rapid, may not always be productive. Furthermore, we show that binding of Mg(2+)·dNTP to Pol X facilitates subsequent formation of the catalytically competent Pol X·DNA·dNTP ternary complex, whereas DNA binding prior to dNTP binding brings the enzyme into a nonproductive conformation where subsequent nucleotide substrate binding is hindered. Together, our results suggest that Pol X prefers an ordered sequential mechanism with Mg(2+)·dNTP as the first substrate. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2652249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26522492009-03-20 Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus Kumar, Sandeep Bakhtina, Marina Tsai, Ming-Daw Biochemistry [Image: see text] A sequential ordered substrate binding established previously for several DNA polymerases is generally extended to all DNA polymerases, and the characterization of novel polymerases is often based on the assumption that the enzymes should productively bind DNA substrate first, followed by template-directed dNTP binding. The comprehensive kinetic study of DNA polymerase X (Pol X) from African swine fever virus reported here is the first analysis of the substrate binding order performed for a low-fidelity DNA polymerase. A classical steady-state kinetic approach using substrate analogue inhibition assays demonstrates that Pol X does not follow the bi-bi ordered mechanism established for other DNA polymerases. Further, using isotope-trapping experiments and stopped-flow fluorescence assays, we show that Pol X can bind Mg(2+)·dNTPs in a productive manner in the absence of DNA substrate. We also show that DNA binding to Pol X, although rapid, may not always be productive. Furthermore, we show that binding of Mg(2+)·dNTP to Pol X facilitates subsequent formation of the catalytically competent Pol X·DNA·dNTP ternary complex, whereas DNA binding prior to dNTP binding brings the enzyme into a nonproductive conformation where subsequent nucleotide substrate binding is hindered. Together, our results suggest that Pol X prefers an ordered sequential mechanism with Mg(2+)·dNTP as the first substrate. American Chemical Society 2008-07-04 2008-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2652249/ /pubmed/18598057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi800731m Text en Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org. 40.75 |
spellingShingle | Kumar, Sandeep Bakhtina, Marina Tsai, Ming-Daw Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title | Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title_full | Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title_fullStr | Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title_full_unstemmed | Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title_short | Altered Order of Substrate Binding by DNA Polymerase X from African Swine Fever Virus |
title_sort | altered order of substrate binding by dna polymerase x from african swine fever virus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18598057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi800731m |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarsandeep alteredorderofsubstratebindingbydnapolymerasexfromafricanswinefevervirus AT bakhtinamarina alteredorderofsubstratebindingbydnapolymerasexfromafricanswinefevervirus AT tsaimingdaw alteredorderofsubstratebindingbydnapolymerasexfromafricanswinefevervirus |