Cargando…
Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes
BACKGROUND: Microarray technologies are widely used to quantify the abundance of transcripts corresponding to thousands of genes. To maximise the robustness of transcriptome results, we have tested the performance and reproducibility of rat and mouse gene expression data obtained with Affymetrix, Il...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19196459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-63 |
_version_ | 1782165247660916736 |
---|---|
author | Wilder, Steven P Kaisaki, Pamela J Argoud, Karène Salhan, Anita Ragoussis, Jiannis Bihoreau, Marie-Thérèse Gauguier, Dominique |
author_facet | Wilder, Steven P Kaisaki, Pamela J Argoud, Karène Salhan, Anita Ragoussis, Jiannis Bihoreau, Marie-Thérèse Gauguier, Dominique |
author_sort | Wilder, Steven P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microarray technologies are widely used to quantify the abundance of transcripts corresponding to thousands of genes. To maximise the robustness of transcriptome results, we have tested the performance and reproducibility of rat and mouse gene expression data obtained with Affymetrix, Illumina and Operon platforms. RESULTS: We present a thorough analysis of the degree of reproducibility provided by analysing the transcriptomic profile of the same animals of several experimental groups under different popular microarray technologies in different tissues. Concordant results from inter- and intra-platform comparisons were maximised by testing many popular computational methods for generating fold changes and significances and by only considering oligonucleotides giving high expression levels. The choice of Affymetrix signal extraction technique was shown to have the greatest effect on the concordance across platforms. In both species, when choosing optimal methods, the agreement between data generated on the Affymetrix and Illumina was excellent; this was verified using qRT-PCR on a selection of genes present on all platforms. CONCLUSION: This study provides an extensive assessment of analytical methods best suited for processing data from different microarray technologies and can assist integration of technologically different gene expression datasets in biological systems. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2652496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26524962009-03-07 Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes Wilder, Steven P Kaisaki, Pamela J Argoud, Karène Salhan, Anita Ragoussis, Jiannis Bihoreau, Marie-Thérèse Gauguier, Dominique BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Microarray technologies are widely used to quantify the abundance of transcripts corresponding to thousands of genes. To maximise the robustness of transcriptome results, we have tested the performance and reproducibility of rat and mouse gene expression data obtained with Affymetrix, Illumina and Operon platforms. RESULTS: We present a thorough analysis of the degree of reproducibility provided by analysing the transcriptomic profile of the same animals of several experimental groups under different popular microarray technologies in different tissues. Concordant results from inter- and intra-platform comparisons were maximised by testing many popular computational methods for generating fold changes and significances and by only considering oligonucleotides giving high expression levels. The choice of Affymetrix signal extraction technique was shown to have the greatest effect on the concordance across platforms. In both species, when choosing optimal methods, the agreement between data generated on the Affymetrix and Illumina was excellent; this was verified using qRT-PCR on a selection of genes present on all platforms. CONCLUSION: This study provides an extensive assessment of analytical methods best suited for processing data from different microarray technologies and can assist integration of technologically different gene expression datasets in biological systems. BioMed Central 2009-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2652496/ /pubmed/19196459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-63 Text en Copyright © 2009 Wilder et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Wilder, Steven P Kaisaki, Pamela J Argoud, Karène Salhan, Anita Ragoussis, Jiannis Bihoreau, Marie-Thérèse Gauguier, Dominique Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title | Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title_full | Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title_short | Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
title_sort | comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19196459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilderstevenp comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT kaisakipamelaj comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT argoudkarene comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT salhananita comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT ragoussisjiannis comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT bihoreaumarietherese comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes AT gauguierdominique comparativeanalysisofmethodsforgenetranscriptionprofilingdataderivedfromdifferentmicroarraytechnologiesinratandmousemodelsofdiabetes |