Cargando…

Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spaar, Anne, Frey, Martin, Turk, Alexander, Karrer, Werner, Puhan, Milo A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19254374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-14
_version_ 1782165265847418880
author Spaar, Anne
Frey, Martin
Turk, Alexander
Karrer, Werner
Puhan, Milo A
author_facet Spaar, Anne
Frey, Martin
Turk, Alexander
Karrer, Werner
Puhan, Milo A
author_sort Spaar, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barriers whereas the perspective of recruiting physicians has received less attention. Therefore, our aim was to conduct a postal survey among recruiting physicians of a multi-center trial to weigh barriers according to their impact on recruitment. METHODS: We identified any potential recruitment barriers from the literature and from our own experience with a multi-center trial of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered questionnaire where recruiting physicians were asked to express their agreement with statements about recruitment barriers on a Likert-type scale from 1 (full agreement with statement = very substantial recruitment barrier) to 7 (no agreement with statement = no recruitment barrier). RESULTS: 38 of 55 recruiting physicians returned questionnaires (69% response rate), of which 35 could be analyzed (64% useable response rate). Recruiting physicians reported that "time constraints" (median agreement of 3, interquartile range 2–5) had the most negative impact on recruitment followed by "difficulties including identified eligible patients" (median agreement of 5, IQR 3–6). Other barriers such as "trial design barriers", "lack of access to treatment", "individual barriers of recruiting physicians" or "insufficient training of recruiting physicians" were perceived to have little or no impact on patient recruitment. CONCLUSION: Physicians perceived time constraints as the most relevant recruitment barrier in a randomized trial. To overcome recruitment barriers interventions, that are affordable for both industry- and investigator-driven trials, need to be developed and tested in randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN84612310
format Text
id pubmed-2653070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26530702009-03-10 Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey Spaar, Anne Frey, Martin Turk, Alexander Karrer, Werner Puhan, Milo A BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barriers whereas the perspective of recruiting physicians has received less attention. Therefore, our aim was to conduct a postal survey among recruiting physicians of a multi-center trial to weigh barriers according to their impact on recruitment. METHODS: We identified any potential recruitment barriers from the literature and from our own experience with a multi-center trial of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered questionnaire where recruiting physicians were asked to express their agreement with statements about recruitment barriers on a Likert-type scale from 1 (full agreement with statement = very substantial recruitment barrier) to 7 (no agreement with statement = no recruitment barrier). RESULTS: 38 of 55 recruiting physicians returned questionnaires (69% response rate), of which 35 could be analyzed (64% useable response rate). Recruiting physicians reported that "time constraints" (median agreement of 3, interquartile range 2–5) had the most negative impact on recruitment followed by "difficulties including identified eligible patients" (median agreement of 5, IQR 3–6). Other barriers such as "trial design barriers", "lack of access to treatment", "individual barriers of recruiting physicians" or "insufficient training of recruiting physicians" were perceived to have little or no impact on patient recruitment. CONCLUSION: Physicians perceived time constraints as the most relevant recruitment barrier in a randomized trial. To overcome recruitment barriers interventions, that are affordable for both industry- and investigator-driven trials, need to be developed and tested in randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN84612310 BioMed Central 2009-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2653070/ /pubmed/19254374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-14 Text en Copyright ©2009 Spaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spaar, Anne
Frey, Martin
Turk, Alexander
Karrer, Werner
Puhan, Milo A
Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title_full Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title_fullStr Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title_short Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey
title_sort recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – a postal survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19254374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-14
work_keys_str_mv AT spaaranne recruitmentbarriersinarandomizedcontrolledtrialfromthephysiciansperspectiveapostalsurvey
AT freymartin recruitmentbarriersinarandomizedcontrolledtrialfromthephysiciansperspectiveapostalsurvey
AT turkalexander recruitmentbarriersinarandomizedcontrolledtrialfromthephysiciansperspectiveapostalsurvey
AT karrerwerner recruitmentbarriersinarandomizedcontrolledtrialfromthephysiciansperspectiveapostalsurvey
AT puhanmiloa recruitmentbarriersinarandomizedcontrolledtrialfromthephysiciansperspectiveapostalsurvey