Cargando…

Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology. METHODS: Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tates, Kiek, Zwaanswijk, Marieke, Otten, Roel, van Dulmen, Sandra, Hoogerbrugge, Peter M, Kamps, Willem A, Bensing, Jozien M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19257883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
_version_ 1782165266102222848
author Tates, Kiek
Zwaanswijk, Marieke
Otten, Roel
van Dulmen, Sandra
Hoogerbrugge, Peter M
Kamps, Willem A
Bensing, Jozien M
author_facet Tates, Kiek
Zwaanswijk, Marieke
Otten, Roel
van Dulmen, Sandra
Hoogerbrugge, Peter M
Kamps, Willem A
Bensing, Jozien M
author_sort Tates, Kiek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology. METHODS: Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8–17), 11 parents, and 18 survivors of childhood cancer (aged 8–17 at diagnosis). RESULTS: All three participant groups could be actively engaged over a one-week period. Respondents highly valued the flexibility and convenience of logging in at their own time and place to join the discussion. Adolescent patients and survivors emphasized that the anonymity experienced made them feel comfortable to express their views in detail. The findings indicate a strong preference for online group discussions across all participant groups. CONCLUSION: The findings show that online focus group methodology is a feasible tool for collecting qualitative data within the setting of paediatric oncology, and may offer new opportunities to collect data in other hard-to-include populations. The evaluations seem to indicate that the online group discussions have given participants an opportunity to articulate their experiences and views in a way they might not have done in a traditional group discussion.
format Text
id pubmed-2653071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26530712009-03-10 Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology Tates, Kiek Zwaanswijk, Marieke Otten, Roel van Dulmen, Sandra Hoogerbrugge, Peter M Kamps, Willem A Bensing, Jozien M BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology. METHODS: Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8–17), 11 parents, and 18 survivors of childhood cancer (aged 8–17 at diagnosis). RESULTS: All three participant groups could be actively engaged over a one-week period. Respondents highly valued the flexibility and convenience of logging in at their own time and place to join the discussion. Adolescent patients and survivors emphasized that the anonymity experienced made them feel comfortable to express their views in detail. The findings indicate a strong preference for online group discussions across all participant groups. CONCLUSION: The findings show that online focus group methodology is a feasible tool for collecting qualitative data within the setting of paediatric oncology, and may offer new opportunities to collect data in other hard-to-include populations. The evaluations seem to indicate that the online group discussions have given participants an opportunity to articulate their experiences and views in a way they might not have done in a traditional group discussion. BioMed Central 2009-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2653071/ /pubmed/19257883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15 Text en Copyright ©2009 Tates et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tates, Kiek
Zwaanswijk, Marieke
Otten, Roel
van Dulmen, Sandra
Hoogerbrugge, Peter M
Kamps, Willem A
Bensing, Jozien M
Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title_full Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title_fullStr Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title_full_unstemmed Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title_short Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
title_sort online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19257883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
work_keys_str_mv AT tateskiek onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT zwaanswijkmarieke onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT ottenroel onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT vandulmensandra onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT hoogerbruggepeterm onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT kampswillema onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology
AT bensingjozienm onlinefocusgroupsasatooltocollectdatainhardtoincludepopulationsexamplesfrompaediatriconcology