Cargando…

The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions

In December 2008, the US Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, released a report, World At Risk. The Report points to the fact that, not only is the use of a weapon of mass destruction in a terrorist attack before the end of 2013, more likely than n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D'Agostino, Mark, Martin, Greg
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19220910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-5-3
_version_ 1782165274631340032
author D'Agostino, Mark
Martin, Greg
author_facet D'Agostino, Mark
Martin, Greg
author_sort D'Agostino, Mark
collection PubMed
description In December 2008, the US Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, released a report, World At Risk. The Report points to the fact that, not only is the use of a weapon of mass destruction in a terrorist attack before the end of 2013, more likely than not, but also to the fact that terrorists are more likely to be able to obtain and use biological weapons than nuclear. This paper examines the recommendations of the report in the context of the historic and geopolitical changes, in particular globalization. The authors highlight the "dual-use" dilemma, as described in the report, as the paradoxical use of technology developed for the benefit of mankind being used for sinister purposes. The mitigation of such a threat lies in broad stakeholder involvement and cooperation, including non-state actors, governments and the bio-tech industry itself. The importance of vigilance measures within the life science community is emphasized and, the authors propose, could include a web-based didactic course in bioterrorism and weapons of mass destruction identification. The site could outline safety protocols, have detailed disaster management tutorials, and could be specifically tailored for different subsets of industry and health professionals. The paper concludes with an endorsement of a multi-pronged approach including strong international guidelines and intelligence cooperation and preparatory measures such as the wide-spread use of detection systems as well as diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism detection at the local level.
format Text
id pubmed-2653473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26534732009-03-10 The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions D'Agostino, Mark Martin, Greg Global Health Editorial In December 2008, the US Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, released a report, World At Risk. The Report points to the fact that, not only is the use of a weapon of mass destruction in a terrorist attack before the end of 2013, more likely than not, but also to the fact that terrorists are more likely to be able to obtain and use biological weapons than nuclear. This paper examines the recommendations of the report in the context of the historic and geopolitical changes, in particular globalization. The authors highlight the "dual-use" dilemma, as described in the report, as the paradoxical use of technology developed for the benefit of mankind being used for sinister purposes. The mitigation of such a threat lies in broad stakeholder involvement and cooperation, including non-state actors, governments and the bio-tech industry itself. The importance of vigilance measures within the life science community is emphasized and, the authors propose, could include a web-based didactic course in bioterrorism and weapons of mass destruction identification. The site could outline safety protocols, have detailed disaster management tutorials, and could be specifically tailored for different subsets of industry and health professionals. The paper concludes with an endorsement of a multi-pronged approach including strong international guidelines and intelligence cooperation and preparatory measures such as the wide-spread use of detection systems as well as diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism detection at the local level. BioMed Central 2009-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2653473/ /pubmed/19220910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-5-3 Text en Copyright © 2009 D'Agostino and Martin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
D'Agostino, Mark
Martin, Greg
The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title_full The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title_fullStr The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title_full_unstemmed The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title_short The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
title_sort bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19220910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-5-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dagostinomark thebiosciencerevolutionthebiologicalweaponsthreatleversinterventions
AT martingreg thebiosciencerevolutionthebiologicalweaponsthreatleversinterventions
AT dagostinomark biosciencerevolutionthebiologicalweaponsthreatleversinterventions
AT martingreg biosciencerevolutionthebiologicalweaponsthreatleversinterventions