Cargando…
Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer
Decision aids in North American breast cancer outpatients have been shown to assist with treatment decision making and reduce decisional conflict. To date, appropriate delivery formats to effectively increase patient participation in newly diagnosed breast cancer inpatients have not been investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19209172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604916 |
_version_ | 1782165307291336704 |
---|---|
author | Vodermaier, A Caspari, C Koehm, J Kahlert, S Ditsch, N Untch, M |
author_facet | Vodermaier, A Caspari, C Koehm, J Kahlert, S Ditsch, N Untch, M |
author_sort | Vodermaier, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decision aids in North American breast cancer outpatients have been shown to assist with treatment decision making and reduce decisional conflict. To date, appropriate delivery formats to effectively increase patient participation in newly diagnosed breast cancer inpatients have not been investigated in the context of German health care provision. The impact of a decision aid intervention was studied in patients (n=111) with a strong suspicion of breast cancer in a randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome variable was decisional conflict. Participants were followed up 1 week post-intervention with a retention rate of 92%. Analyses revealed that the intervention group felt better informed (η(p)(2)=0.06) but did not experience an overall reduction in decisional conflict as compared with the control group. The intervention had no effect on uptake rates of treatment options, length of consultation with the surgeon, time point of treatment decision making, perceived involvement in decision making, neither decision related nor general patient satisfaction. Patients who received the decision aid intervention experienced a small benefit with regards to how informed they felt about advantages and disadvantages of relevant treatment options. Results are discussed in terms of contextual factors and individual differences as moderators of treatment decision aid effectiveness. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2653746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26537462010-02-24 Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer Vodermaier, A Caspari, C Koehm, J Kahlert, S Ditsch, N Untch, M Br J Cancer Clinical Study Decision aids in North American breast cancer outpatients have been shown to assist with treatment decision making and reduce decisional conflict. To date, appropriate delivery formats to effectively increase patient participation in newly diagnosed breast cancer inpatients have not been investigated in the context of German health care provision. The impact of a decision aid intervention was studied in patients (n=111) with a strong suspicion of breast cancer in a randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome variable was decisional conflict. Participants were followed up 1 week post-intervention with a retention rate of 92%. Analyses revealed that the intervention group felt better informed (η(p)(2)=0.06) but did not experience an overall reduction in decisional conflict as compared with the control group. The intervention had no effect on uptake rates of treatment options, length of consultation with the surgeon, time point of treatment decision making, perceived involvement in decision making, neither decision related nor general patient satisfaction. Patients who received the decision aid intervention experienced a small benefit with regards to how informed they felt about advantages and disadvantages of relevant treatment options. Results are discussed in terms of contextual factors and individual differences as moderators of treatment decision aid effectiveness. Nature Publishing Group 2009-02-24 2009-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2653746/ /pubmed/19209172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604916 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Vodermaier, A Caspari, C Koehm, J Kahlert, S Ditsch, N Untch, M Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title | Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title_full | Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title_short | Contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
title_sort | contextual factors in shared decision making: a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19209172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604916 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vodermaiera contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer AT casparic contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer AT koehmj contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer AT kahlerts contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer AT ditschn contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer AT untchm contextualfactorsinshareddecisionmakingarandomisedcontrolledtrialinwomenwithastrongsuspicionofbreastcancer |