Cargando…
Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19295908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859 |
_version_ | 1782165326253785088 |
---|---|
author | Zinner, Dietmar Arnold, Michael L. Roos, Christian |
author_facet | Zinner, Dietmar Arnold, Michael L. Roos, Christian |
author_sort | Zinner, Dietmar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified the kipunji as a sister taxon to Papio and not as a member of Lophocebus. Accordingly, the kipunji was separated into its own monotypic genus, Rungwecebus. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compare available mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data from the voucher specimen of Rungwecebus to other papionin lineages, including a set of geographically proximal (parapatric) baboon samples. Based on mitochondrial sequence data the kipunji clusters with baboon lineages that lie nearest to it geographically, i.e. populations of yellow and chacma baboons from south-eastern Africa, and thus does not represent a sister taxon to Papio. Nuclear data support a Papio+Rungwecebus clade, but it remains questionable whether Rungwecebus represents a sister taxon to Papio, or whether it is nested within the genus as depicted by the mitochondrial phylogeny. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study clearly supports a close relationship between Rungwecebus and Papio and might indicate that the kipunji is congeneric with baboon species. However, due to its morphological and ecological uniqueness Rungwecebus more likely represents a sister lineage to Papio and experienced later introgressive hybridization. Presumably, male (proto-)kipunjis reproduced with sympatric female baboons. Subsequent backcrossing of the hybrids with kipunjis would have resulted in a population with a nuclear kipunji genome, but which retained the yellow/chacma baboon mitochondrial genome. Since only one kipunji specimen was studied, it remains unclear whether all members of the new genus have been impacted by intergeneric introgression or rather only some populations. Further studies with additional Rungwecebus samples are necessary to elucidate the complete evolutionary history of this newly-described primate genus. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2654078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26540782009-03-19 Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? Zinner, Dietmar Arnold, Michael L. Roos, Christian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified the kipunji as a sister taxon to Papio and not as a member of Lophocebus. Accordingly, the kipunji was separated into its own monotypic genus, Rungwecebus. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compare available mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data from the voucher specimen of Rungwecebus to other papionin lineages, including a set of geographically proximal (parapatric) baboon samples. Based on mitochondrial sequence data the kipunji clusters with baboon lineages that lie nearest to it geographically, i.e. populations of yellow and chacma baboons from south-eastern Africa, and thus does not represent a sister taxon to Papio. Nuclear data support a Papio+Rungwecebus clade, but it remains questionable whether Rungwecebus represents a sister taxon to Papio, or whether it is nested within the genus as depicted by the mitochondrial phylogeny. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study clearly supports a close relationship between Rungwecebus and Papio and might indicate that the kipunji is congeneric with baboon species. However, due to its morphological and ecological uniqueness Rungwecebus more likely represents a sister lineage to Papio and experienced later introgressive hybridization. Presumably, male (proto-)kipunjis reproduced with sympatric female baboons. Subsequent backcrossing of the hybrids with kipunjis would have resulted in a population with a nuclear kipunji genome, but which retained the yellow/chacma baboon mitochondrial genome. Since only one kipunji specimen was studied, it remains unclear whether all members of the new genus have been impacted by intergeneric introgression or rather only some populations. Further studies with additional Rungwecebus samples are necessary to elucidate the complete evolutionary history of this newly-described primate genus. Public Library of Science 2009-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2654078/ /pubmed/19295908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859 Text en Zinner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zinner, Dietmar Arnold, Michael L. Roos, Christian Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title | Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title_full | Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title_fullStr | Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title_short | Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? |
title_sort | is the new primate genus rungwecebus a baboon? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19295908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zinnerdietmar isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon AT arnoldmichaell isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon AT rooschristian isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon |