Cargando…

Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?

BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zinner, Dietmar, Arnold, Michael L., Roos, Christian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19295908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859
_version_ 1782165326253785088
author Zinner, Dietmar
Arnold, Michael L.
Roos, Christian
author_facet Zinner, Dietmar
Arnold, Michael L.
Roos, Christian
author_sort Zinner, Dietmar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified the kipunji as a sister taxon to Papio and not as a member of Lophocebus. Accordingly, the kipunji was separated into its own monotypic genus, Rungwecebus. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compare available mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data from the voucher specimen of Rungwecebus to other papionin lineages, including a set of geographically proximal (parapatric) baboon samples. Based on mitochondrial sequence data the kipunji clusters with baboon lineages that lie nearest to it geographically, i.e. populations of yellow and chacma baboons from south-eastern Africa, and thus does not represent a sister taxon to Papio. Nuclear data support a Papio+Rungwecebus clade, but it remains questionable whether Rungwecebus represents a sister taxon to Papio, or whether it is nested within the genus as depicted by the mitochondrial phylogeny. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study clearly supports a close relationship between Rungwecebus and Papio and might indicate that the kipunji is congeneric with baboon species. However, due to its morphological and ecological uniqueness Rungwecebus more likely represents a sister lineage to Papio and experienced later introgressive hybridization. Presumably, male (proto-)kipunjis reproduced with sympatric female baboons. Subsequent backcrossing of the hybrids with kipunjis would have resulted in a population with a nuclear kipunji genome, but which retained the yellow/chacma baboon mitochondrial genome. Since only one kipunji specimen was studied, it remains unclear whether all members of the new genus have been impacted by intergeneric introgression or rather only some populations. Further studies with additional Rungwecebus samples are necessary to elucidate the complete evolutionary history of this newly-described primate genus.
format Text
id pubmed-2654078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26540782009-03-19 Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon? Zinner, Dietmar Arnold, Michael L. Roos, Christian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2005, a new primate species from Tanzania, the kipunji, was described and recognized as a member of the mangabey genus Lophocebus. However, molecular investigations based upon a number of papionins, including a limited sample of baboons of mainly unknown geographic origin, identified the kipunji as a sister taxon to Papio and not as a member of Lophocebus. Accordingly, the kipunji was separated into its own monotypic genus, Rungwecebus. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compare available mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data from the voucher specimen of Rungwecebus to other papionin lineages, including a set of geographically proximal (parapatric) baboon samples. Based on mitochondrial sequence data the kipunji clusters with baboon lineages that lie nearest to it geographically, i.e. populations of yellow and chacma baboons from south-eastern Africa, and thus does not represent a sister taxon to Papio. Nuclear data support a Papio+Rungwecebus clade, but it remains questionable whether Rungwecebus represents a sister taxon to Papio, or whether it is nested within the genus as depicted by the mitochondrial phylogeny. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study clearly supports a close relationship between Rungwecebus and Papio and might indicate that the kipunji is congeneric with baboon species. However, due to its morphological and ecological uniqueness Rungwecebus more likely represents a sister lineage to Papio and experienced later introgressive hybridization. Presumably, male (proto-)kipunjis reproduced with sympatric female baboons. Subsequent backcrossing of the hybrids with kipunjis would have resulted in a population with a nuclear kipunji genome, but which retained the yellow/chacma baboon mitochondrial genome. Since only one kipunji specimen was studied, it remains unclear whether all members of the new genus have been impacted by intergeneric introgression or rather only some populations. Further studies with additional Rungwecebus samples are necessary to elucidate the complete evolutionary history of this newly-described primate genus. Public Library of Science 2009-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2654078/ /pubmed/19295908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859 Text en Zinner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zinner, Dietmar
Arnold, Michael L.
Roos, Christian
Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title_full Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title_fullStr Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title_full_unstemmed Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title_short Is the New Primate Genus Rungwecebus a Baboon?
title_sort is the new primate genus rungwecebus a baboon?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19295908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004859
work_keys_str_mv AT zinnerdietmar isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon
AT arnoldmichaell isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon
AT rooschristian isthenewprimategenusrungwecebusababoon