Cargando…
Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-ter...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503 |
_version_ | 1782165351560118272 |
---|---|
author | Tucker, Olga N. Rela, Mohamed |
author_facet | Tucker, Olga N. Rela, Mohamed |
author_sort | Tucker, Olga N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2654339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26543392009-03-12 Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement Tucker, Olga N. Rela, Mohamed HPB Surg Review Article Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008 2009-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2654339/ /pubmed/19283083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503 Text en Copyright © 2008 O. N. Tucker and M. Rela. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Tucker, Olga N. Rela, Mohamed Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title | Controversies in the Management of
Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title_full | Controversies in the Management of
Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title_fullStr | Controversies in the Management of
Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversies in the Management of
Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title_short | Controversies in the Management of
Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement |
title_sort | controversies in the management of
borderline resectable proximal pancreatic
adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuckerolgan controversiesinthemanagementofborderlineresectableproximalpancreaticadenocarcinomawithvascularinvolvement AT relamohamed controversiesinthemanagementofborderlineresectableproximalpancreaticadenocarcinomawithvascularinvolvement |