Cargando…

Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement

Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Olga N., Rela, Mohamed
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503
_version_ 1782165351560118272
author Tucker, Olga N.
Rela, Mohamed
author_facet Tucker, Olga N.
Rela, Mohamed
author_sort Tucker, Olga N.
collection PubMed
description Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2654339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26543392009-03-12 Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement Tucker, Olga N. Rela, Mohamed HPB Surg Review Article Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008 2009-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2654339/ /pubmed/19283083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503 Text en Copyright © 2008 O. N. Tucker and M. Rela. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Tucker, Olga N.
Rela, Mohamed
Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title_full Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title_fullStr Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title_short Controversies in the Management of Borderline Resectable Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Vascular Involvement
title_sort controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/839503
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerolgan controversiesinthemanagementofborderlineresectableproximalpancreaticadenocarcinomawithvascularinvolvement
AT relamohamed controversiesinthemanagementofborderlineresectableproximalpancreaticadenocarcinomawithvascularinvolvement