Cargando…

Normative productivity of the global vegetation

BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmenta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandrov, Georgii A, Matsunaga, Tsuneo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8
_version_ 1782165361715576832
author Alexandrov, Georgii A
Matsunaga, Tsuneo
author_facet Alexandrov, Georgii A
Matsunaga, Tsuneo
author_sort Alexandrov, Georgii A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the end of 1990s, IGBP sponsored release of a data set summarizing the model outputs and setting certain norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity. Since a number of new models and new versions of old models were developed during the past decade, these normative data require updating. RESULTS: Here, we provide the series of updates that reflects evolution of biosphere models and demonstrates evolutional stability of the global and regional estimates of terrestrial productivity. Most of them fit well the long-living Miami model. At the same time we call attention to the emerging alternative: the global potential for net primary production of biomass may be as high as 70 PgC y(-1), the productivity of larch forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of taiga zone, and the productivity of rain-green forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of tropical rainforest zone. CONCLUSION: The departure from Miami model's worldview mentioned above cannot be simply ignored. It requires thorough examination using modern observational tools and techniques for model-data fusion. Stability of normative knowledge is not its ultimate goal – the norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity must be evidence-based.
format Text
id pubmed-2654439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26544392009-03-12 Normative productivity of the global vegetation Alexandrov, Georgii A Matsunaga, Tsuneo Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the end of 1990s, IGBP sponsored release of a data set summarizing the model outputs and setting certain norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity. Since a number of new models and new versions of old models were developed during the past decade, these normative data require updating. RESULTS: Here, we provide the series of updates that reflects evolution of biosphere models and demonstrates evolutional stability of the global and regional estimates of terrestrial productivity. Most of them fit well the long-living Miami model. At the same time we call attention to the emerging alternative: the global potential for net primary production of biomass may be as high as 70 PgC y(-1), the productivity of larch forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of taiga zone, and the productivity of rain-green forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of tropical rainforest zone. CONCLUSION: The departure from Miami model's worldview mentioned above cannot be simply ignored. It requires thorough examination using modern observational tools and techniques for model-data fusion. Stability of normative knowledge is not its ultimate goal – the norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity must be evidence-based. BioMed Central 2008-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2654439/ /pubmed/19108718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8 Text en Copyright © 2008 Alexandrov and Matsunaga; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Alexandrov, Georgii A
Matsunaga, Tsuneo
Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title_full Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title_fullStr Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title_full_unstemmed Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title_short Normative productivity of the global vegetation
title_sort normative productivity of the global vegetation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrovgeorgiia normativeproductivityoftheglobalvegetation
AT matsunagatsuneo normativeproductivityoftheglobalvegetation