Cargando…
Normative productivity of the global vegetation
BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmenta...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8 |
_version_ | 1782165361715576832 |
---|---|
author | Alexandrov, Georgii A Matsunaga, Tsuneo |
author_facet | Alexandrov, Georgii A Matsunaga, Tsuneo |
author_sort | Alexandrov, Georgii A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the end of 1990s, IGBP sponsored release of a data set summarizing the model outputs and setting certain norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity. Since a number of new models and new versions of old models were developed during the past decade, these normative data require updating. RESULTS: Here, we provide the series of updates that reflects evolution of biosphere models and demonstrates evolutional stability of the global and regional estimates of terrestrial productivity. Most of them fit well the long-living Miami model. At the same time we call attention to the emerging alternative: the global potential for net primary production of biomass may be as high as 70 PgC y(-1), the productivity of larch forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of taiga zone, and the productivity of rain-green forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of tropical rainforest zone. CONCLUSION: The departure from Miami model's worldview mentioned above cannot be simply ignored. It requires thorough examination using modern observational tools and techniques for model-data fusion. Stability of normative knowledge is not its ultimate goal – the norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity must be evidence-based. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2654439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26544392009-03-12 Normative productivity of the global vegetation Alexandrov, Georgii A Matsunaga, Tsuneo Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: The biosphere models of terrestrial productivity are essential for projecting climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options. Many of them have been developed in connection to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) that backs the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the end of 1990s, IGBP sponsored release of a data set summarizing the model outputs and setting certain norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity. Since a number of new models and new versions of old models were developed during the past decade, these normative data require updating. RESULTS: Here, we provide the series of updates that reflects evolution of biosphere models and demonstrates evolutional stability of the global and regional estimates of terrestrial productivity. Most of them fit well the long-living Miami model. At the same time we call attention to the emerging alternative: the global potential for net primary production of biomass may be as high as 70 PgC y(-1), the productivity of larch forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of taiga zone, and the productivity of rain-green forest zone may be comparable to the productivity of tropical rainforest zone. CONCLUSION: The departure from Miami model's worldview mentioned above cannot be simply ignored. It requires thorough examination using modern observational tools and techniques for model-data fusion. Stability of normative knowledge is not its ultimate goal – the norms for estimates of terrestrial productivity must be evidence-based. BioMed Central 2008-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2654439/ /pubmed/19108718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8 Text en Copyright © 2008 Alexandrov and Matsunaga; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Alexandrov, Georgii A Matsunaga, Tsuneo Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title | Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title_full | Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title_fullStr | Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title_full_unstemmed | Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title_short | Normative productivity of the global vegetation |
title_sort | normative productivity of the global vegetation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandrovgeorgiia normativeproductivityoftheglobalvegetation AT matsunagatsuneo normativeproductivityoftheglobalvegetation |