Cargando…
A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD
INTRODUCTION: The goal of the present work was to examine how clinicians’ perceptions of the properties of antidepressants may influence their choice of antidepressants when treating major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: 273 of 682 (40%) clinicians attending a psychopharmacology review course re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19300547 |
_version_ | 1782165379322216448 |
---|---|
author | Papakostas, George I Hallett, Lindsay A Smith, Juliana Tossani, Eliana Mascarini, Alessandra Burns, Alana M Birnbaum, Robert J Fava, Maurizio Alpert, Jonathan E |
author_facet | Papakostas, George I Hallett, Lindsay A Smith, Juliana Tossani, Eliana Mascarini, Alessandra Burns, Alana M Birnbaum, Robert J Fava, Maurizio Alpert, Jonathan E |
author_sort | Papakostas, George I |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The goal of the present work was to examine how clinicians’ perceptions of the properties of antidepressants may influence their choice of antidepressants when treating major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: 273 of 682 (40%) clinicians attending a psychopharmacology review course responded to a questionnaire designed to explore their practices and perceptions with regards to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Most clinicians ranked efficacy (57.3%) as the most important factor when selecting antidepressants, followed by safety (23.0%), tolerability (9.4%), rapidity of action (5.2%), and cost (4.9%). However, when presented with hypothetical scenarios in which there was a difference in efficacy between two antidepressant agents, the relative safety, tolerability, and cost of the two agents significantly influenced the likelihood of choosing one antidepressant over another. In fact, clinicians required progressively greater differences in efficacy between two agents in order to select one antidepressant over another given a difference in terms of their safety than tolerability, or their tolerability than cost (p < 0.0001 all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: When selecting an antidepressant, clinicians appear to be most influenced by efficacy, followed by safety. Rapidity of action and cost may be less salient considerations in clinical practice. Further research is necessary to elucidate factors that influence clinicians’ choice of antidepressants. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2654520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26545202009-03-19 A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD Papakostas, George I Hallett, Lindsay A Smith, Juliana Tossani, Eliana Mascarini, Alessandra Burns, Alana M Birnbaum, Robert J Fava, Maurizio Alpert, Jonathan E Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research INTRODUCTION: The goal of the present work was to examine how clinicians’ perceptions of the properties of antidepressants may influence their choice of antidepressants when treating major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: 273 of 682 (40%) clinicians attending a psychopharmacology review course responded to a questionnaire designed to explore their practices and perceptions with regards to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Most clinicians ranked efficacy (57.3%) as the most important factor when selecting antidepressants, followed by safety (23.0%), tolerability (9.4%), rapidity of action (5.2%), and cost (4.9%). However, when presented with hypothetical scenarios in which there was a difference in efficacy between two antidepressant agents, the relative safety, tolerability, and cost of the two agents significantly influenced the likelihood of choosing one antidepressant over another. In fact, clinicians required progressively greater differences in efficacy between two agents in order to select one antidepressant over another given a difference in terms of their safety than tolerability, or their tolerability than cost (p < 0.0001 all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: When selecting an antidepressant, clinicians appear to be most influenced by efficacy, followed by safety. Rapidity of action and cost may be less salient considerations in clinical practice. Further research is necessary to elucidate factors that influence clinicians’ choice of antidepressants. Dove Medical Press 2007-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2654520/ /pubmed/19300547 Text en © 2007 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved |
spellingShingle | Original Research Papakostas, George I Hallett, Lindsay A Smith, Juliana Tossani, Eliana Mascarini, Alessandra Burns, Alana M Birnbaum, Robert J Fava, Maurizio Alpert, Jonathan E A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title | A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title_full | A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title_fullStr | A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title_short | A survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in MDD |
title_sort | survey of five antidepressant properties influencing clinician’s treatment choices in mdd |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2654520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19300547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papakostasgeorgei asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT hallettlindsaya asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT smithjuliana asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT tossanieliana asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT mascarinialessandra asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT burnsalanam asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT birnbaumrobertj asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT favamaurizio asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT alpertjonathane asurveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT papakostasgeorgei surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT hallettlindsaya surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT smithjuliana surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT tossanieliana surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT mascarinialessandra surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT burnsalanam surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT birnbaumrobertj surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT favamaurizio surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd AT alpertjonathane surveyoffiveantidepressantpropertiesinfluencingclinicianstreatmentchoicesinmdd |