Cargando…

A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data

BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Clustering the genes on the basis of similarity of their expre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards, Alexander L, Holmans, Peter, O'Donovan, Michael C, Owen, Michael J, Jones, Lesley
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-490
_version_ 1782165437508747264
author Richards, Alexander L
Holmans, Peter
O'Donovan, Michael C
Owen, Michael J
Jones, Lesley
author_facet Richards, Alexander L
Holmans, Peter
O'Donovan, Michael C
Owen, Michael J
Jones, Lesley
author_sort Richards, Alexander L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Clustering the genes on the basis of similarity of their expression profiles can simplify the data, and potentially provides an important source of biological inference, but these methods have not been tested systematically on datasets from complex human tissues. In this paper, four clustering methods, CRC, k-means, ISA and memISA, are used upon three brain expression datasets. The results are compared on speed, gene coverage and GO enrichment. The effects of combining the clusters produced by each method are also assessed. RESULTS: k-means outperforms the other methods, with 100% gene coverage and GO enrichments only slightly exceeded by memISA and ISA. Those two methods produce greater GO enrichments on the datasets used, but at the cost of much lower gene coverage, fewer clusters produced, and speed. The clusters they find are largely different to those produced by k-means. Combining clusters produced by k-means and memISA or ISA leads to increased GO enrichment and number of clusters produced (compared to k-means alone), without negatively impacting gene coverage. memISA can also find potentially disease-related clusters. In two independent dorsolateral prefrontal cortex datasets, it finds three overlapping clusters that are either enriched for genes associated with schizophrenia, genes differentially expressed in schizophrenia, or both. Two of these clusters are enriched for genes of the MAP kinase pathway, suggesting a possible role for this pathway in the aetiology of schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: Considered alone, k-means clustering is the most effective of the four methods on typical microarray brain expression datasets. However, memISA and ISA can add extra high-quality clusters to the set produced by k-means, so combining these three methods is the method of choice.
format Text
id pubmed-2655095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26550952009-03-14 A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data Richards, Alexander L Holmans, Peter O'Donovan, Michael C Owen, Michael J Jones, Lesley BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays, which determine the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes from a sample, are an important research tool. However, the volume of data they produce can be an obstacle to interpretation of the results. Clustering the genes on the basis of similarity of their expression profiles can simplify the data, and potentially provides an important source of biological inference, but these methods have not been tested systematically on datasets from complex human tissues. In this paper, four clustering methods, CRC, k-means, ISA and memISA, are used upon three brain expression datasets. The results are compared on speed, gene coverage and GO enrichment. The effects of combining the clusters produced by each method are also assessed. RESULTS: k-means outperforms the other methods, with 100% gene coverage and GO enrichments only slightly exceeded by memISA and ISA. Those two methods produce greater GO enrichments on the datasets used, but at the cost of much lower gene coverage, fewer clusters produced, and speed. The clusters they find are largely different to those produced by k-means. Combining clusters produced by k-means and memISA or ISA leads to increased GO enrichment and number of clusters produced (compared to k-means alone), without negatively impacting gene coverage. memISA can also find potentially disease-related clusters. In two independent dorsolateral prefrontal cortex datasets, it finds three overlapping clusters that are either enriched for genes associated with schizophrenia, genes differentially expressed in schizophrenia, or both. Two of these clusters are enriched for genes of the MAP kinase pathway, suggesting a possible role for this pathway in the aetiology of schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: Considered alone, k-means clustering is the most effective of the four methods on typical microarray brain expression datasets. However, memISA and ISA can add extra high-quality clusters to the set produced by k-means, so combining these three methods is the method of choice. BioMed Central 2008-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2655095/ /pubmed/19032745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-490 Text en Copyright © 2008 Richards et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Richards, Alexander L
Holmans, Peter
O'Donovan, Michael C
Owen, Michael J
Jones, Lesley
A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title_full A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title_fullStr A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title_short A comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
title_sort comparison of four clustering methods for brain expression microarray data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-490
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsalexanderl acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT holmanspeter acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT odonovanmichaelc acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT owenmichaelj acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT joneslesley acomparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT richardsalexanderl comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT holmanspeter comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT odonovanmichaelc comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT owenmichaelj comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata
AT joneslesley comparisonoffourclusteringmethodsforbrainexpressionmicroarraydata