Cargando…

Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jooeun, Lee, Chang Hwan, Choi, Jaewan, Yoon, Sam Young, Sung, Kyung Rim, Park, Seong Bae, Kook, Michael S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27
_version_ 1782165472890847232
author Lee, Jooeun
Lee, Chang Hwan
Choi, Jaewan
Yoon, Sam Young
Sung, Kyung Rim
Park, Seong Bae
Kook, Michael S.
author_facet Lee, Jooeun
Lee, Chang Hwan
Choi, Jaewan
Yoon, Sam Young
Sung, Kyung Rim
Park, Seong Bae
Kook, Michael S.
author_sort Lee, Jooeun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were enrolled. IOPs were measured by GAT and DCT. CCT was measured three times and the average was calculated. Each eye was classified into one of three groups according to CCT: low CCT (group A, CCT<520 µm, n=146); normal CCT (group B, 520 µm ≤ CT ≤ 550 µm, n=163); and high CCT (group C, CCT>550 µm, n=142). In each group, we investigated the association of CCT with IOP measurement by GAT and DCT. RESULTS: The IOPs measured by GAT and DCT were significantly associated for all eyes (R=0.853, p<0.001, Pearson correlation). CCT was related with both IOP measurement by GAT and DCT with statistical significance (mixed effect model, p<0.001). However, subgroup analysis showed that CCT affected IOP measured by GAT for groups B and C, whereas it affected IOP measured by DCT only for group C. CONCLUSIONS: IOP measured by DCT was not affected by CCT in eyes with low to normal CCT, whereas this measurement was affected in eyes of high CCT range. CCT may have less effect on IOP measurements using DCT than those obtained by GAT, within a specified range of CCT.
format Text
id pubmed-2655749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26557492009-04-01 Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Lee, Jooeun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaewan Yoon, Sam Young Sung, Kyung Rim Park, Seong Bae Kook, Michael S. Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were enrolled. IOPs were measured by GAT and DCT. CCT was measured three times and the average was calculated. Each eye was classified into one of three groups according to CCT: low CCT (group A, CCT<520 µm, n=146); normal CCT (group B, 520 µm ≤ CT ≤ 550 µm, n=163); and high CCT (group C, CCT>550 µm, n=142). In each group, we investigated the association of CCT with IOP measurement by GAT and DCT. RESULTS: The IOPs measured by GAT and DCT were significantly associated for all eyes (R=0.853, p<0.001, Pearson correlation). CCT was related with both IOP measurement by GAT and DCT with statistical significance (mixed effect model, p<0.001). However, subgroup analysis showed that CCT affected IOP measured by GAT for groups B and C, whereas it affected IOP measured by DCT only for group C. CONCLUSIONS: IOP measured by DCT was not affected by CCT in eyes with low to normal CCT, whereas this measurement was affected in eyes of high CCT range. CCT may have less effect on IOP measurements using DCT than those obtained by GAT, within a specified range of CCT. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2009-03 2009-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2655749/ /pubmed/19337476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27 Text en Copyright © 2009 by the Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jooeun
Lee, Chang Hwan
Choi, Jaewan
Yoon, Sam Young
Sung, Kyung Rim
Park, Seong Bae
Kook, Michael S.
Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title_full Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title_fullStr Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title_short Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
title_sort comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27
work_keys_str_mv AT leejooeun comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT leechanghwan comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT choijaewan comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT yoonsamyoung comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT sungkyungrim comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT parkseongbae comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry
AT kookmichaels comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry