Cargando…
Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Ophthalmological Society
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27 |
_version_ | 1782165472890847232 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jooeun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaewan Yoon, Sam Young Sung, Kyung Rim Park, Seong Bae Kook, Michael S. |
author_facet | Lee, Jooeun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaewan Yoon, Sam Young Sung, Kyung Rim Park, Seong Bae Kook, Michael S. |
author_sort | Lee, Jooeun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were enrolled. IOPs were measured by GAT and DCT. CCT was measured three times and the average was calculated. Each eye was classified into one of three groups according to CCT: low CCT (group A, CCT<520 µm, n=146); normal CCT (group B, 520 µm ≤ CT ≤ 550 µm, n=163); and high CCT (group C, CCT>550 µm, n=142). In each group, we investigated the association of CCT with IOP measurement by GAT and DCT. RESULTS: The IOPs measured by GAT and DCT were significantly associated for all eyes (R=0.853, p<0.001, Pearson correlation). CCT was related with both IOP measurement by GAT and DCT with statistical significance (mixed effect model, p<0.001). However, subgroup analysis showed that CCT affected IOP measured by GAT for groups B and C, whereas it affected IOP measured by DCT only for group C. CONCLUSIONS: IOP measured by DCT was not affected by CCT in eyes with low to normal CCT, whereas this measurement was affected in eyes of high CCT range. CCT may have less effect on IOP measurements using DCT than those obtained by GAT, within a specified range of CCT. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2655749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Korean Ophthalmological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26557492009-04-01 Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Lee, Jooeun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaewan Yoon, Sam Young Sung, Kyung Rim Park, Seong Bae Kook, Michael S. Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and to investigate the association of IOPs on eyes of varying central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 451 eyes of 233 subjects were enrolled. IOPs were measured by GAT and DCT. CCT was measured three times and the average was calculated. Each eye was classified into one of three groups according to CCT: low CCT (group A, CCT<520 µm, n=146); normal CCT (group B, 520 µm ≤ CT ≤ 550 µm, n=163); and high CCT (group C, CCT>550 µm, n=142). In each group, we investigated the association of CCT with IOP measurement by GAT and DCT. RESULTS: The IOPs measured by GAT and DCT were significantly associated for all eyes (R=0.853, p<0.001, Pearson correlation). CCT was related with both IOP measurement by GAT and DCT with statistical significance (mixed effect model, p<0.001). However, subgroup analysis showed that CCT affected IOP measured by GAT for groups B and C, whereas it affected IOP measured by DCT only for group C. CONCLUSIONS: IOP measured by DCT was not affected by CCT in eyes with low to normal CCT, whereas this measurement was affected in eyes of high CCT range. CCT may have less effect on IOP measurements using DCT than those obtained by GAT, within a specified range of CCT. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2009-03 2009-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2655749/ /pubmed/19337476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27 Text en Copyright © 2009 by the Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jooeun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaewan Yoon, Sam Young Sung, Kyung Rim Park, Seong Bae Kook, Michael S. Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title | Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title_full | Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title_short | Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
title_sort | comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejooeun comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT leechanghwan comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT choijaewan comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT yoonsamyoung comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT sungkyungrim comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT parkseongbae comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry AT kookmichaels comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometry |