Cargando…

Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies

INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins represent a highly specific marker for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, where they have been associated with certain clinical manifestations. Historically, autoantibodies against ribosomal P proteins have been detected by indirec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahler, Michael, Ngo, Jennifer T, Schulte-Pelkum, Johannes, Luettich, Tanja, Fritzler, Marvin J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2548
_version_ 1782165482437083136
author Mahler, Michael
Ngo, Jennifer T
Schulte-Pelkum, Johannes
Luettich, Tanja
Fritzler, Marvin J
author_facet Mahler, Michael
Ngo, Jennifer T
Schulte-Pelkum, Johannes
Luettich, Tanja
Fritzler, Marvin J
author_sort Mahler, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins represent a highly specific marker for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, where they have been associated with certain clinical manifestations. Historically, autoantibodies against ribosomal P proteins have been detected by indirect immunofluorescence, immunodiffusion, immunoblot, and other immunoassays. More recently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and line and addressable laser bead immunoassays have become more widely used. The primary goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence using conventional HEp-2 substrates in the detection of sera with ribosomal P antibodies as detected by other immunoassays. METHODS: Anti-ribosomal P-positive sera (n = 345) as detected by an addressable laser bead immunoassay were collected between 2003 and 2007 and analysed by indirect immunofluorescence. Furthermore, 51 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples from an unselected systemic lupus erythematosus cohort (n = 100) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) reference sera were tested for anti-ribosomal P reactivity. RESULTS: In the cohort of 345 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples identified by addressable laser bead immunoassay, a low sensitivity (<30%) of indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cell substrates was observed. Although the degree of sensitivity varied among different manufacturers, all immunofluorescence substrates exhibited limited sensitivity and false-negative results were not restricted to samples with low anti-ribosomal P titers. Even the anti-ribosomal P reactivity of CDC ANA reference serum number 12 was not clearly predictable by indirect immunofluorescence. Comparison of five different methods for the detection of anti-ribosomal P found moderate qualitative agreements. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, we conclude that indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells is not a reliable screening test for the prediction of ribosomal P antibodies. As this method is widely used as a first-line screening test for anti-nuclear and other autoantibodies, special considerations for the detection of ribosomal P antibodies are needed. As with many other autoantibodies, further effort is required for the standardisation of ribosomal P immunoassays.
format Text
id pubmed-2656233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26562332009-03-17 Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies Mahler, Michael Ngo, Jennifer T Schulte-Pelkum, Johannes Luettich, Tanja Fritzler, Marvin J Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins represent a highly specific marker for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, where they have been associated with certain clinical manifestations. Historically, autoantibodies against ribosomal P proteins have been detected by indirect immunofluorescence, immunodiffusion, immunoblot, and other immunoassays. More recently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and line and addressable laser bead immunoassays have become more widely used. The primary goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence using conventional HEp-2 substrates in the detection of sera with ribosomal P antibodies as detected by other immunoassays. METHODS: Anti-ribosomal P-positive sera (n = 345) as detected by an addressable laser bead immunoassay were collected between 2003 and 2007 and analysed by indirect immunofluorescence. Furthermore, 51 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples from an unselected systemic lupus erythematosus cohort (n = 100) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) reference sera were tested for anti-ribosomal P reactivity. RESULTS: In the cohort of 345 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples identified by addressable laser bead immunoassay, a low sensitivity (<30%) of indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cell substrates was observed. Although the degree of sensitivity varied among different manufacturers, all immunofluorescence substrates exhibited limited sensitivity and false-negative results were not restricted to samples with low anti-ribosomal P titers. Even the anti-ribosomal P reactivity of CDC ANA reference serum number 12 was not clearly predictable by indirect immunofluorescence. Comparison of five different methods for the detection of anti-ribosomal P found moderate qualitative agreements. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, we conclude that indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells is not a reliable screening test for the prediction of ribosomal P antibodies. As this method is widely used as a first-line screening test for anti-nuclear and other autoantibodies, special considerations for the detection of ribosomal P antibodies are needed. As with many other autoantibodies, further effort is required for the standardisation of ribosomal P immunoassays. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2656233/ /pubmed/19000323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2548 Text en Copyright © 2008 Mahler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahler, Michael
Ngo, Jennifer T
Schulte-Pelkum, Johannes
Luettich, Tanja
Fritzler, Marvin J
Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title_full Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title_fullStr Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title_short Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies
title_sort limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-rib-p antibodies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar2548
work_keys_str_mv AT mahlermichael limitedreliabilityoftheindirectimmunofluorescencetechniqueforthedetectionofantiribpantibodies
AT ngojennifert limitedreliabilityoftheindirectimmunofluorescencetechniqueforthedetectionofantiribpantibodies
AT schultepelkumjohannes limitedreliabilityoftheindirectimmunofluorescencetechniqueforthedetectionofantiribpantibodies
AT luettichtanja limitedreliabilityoftheindirectimmunofluorescencetechniqueforthedetectionofantiribpantibodies
AT fritzlermarvinj limitedreliabilityoftheindirectimmunofluorescencetechniqueforthedetectionofantiribpantibodies