Cargando…

Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator

PURPOSE: Circular external fixators have several advantages over other surgical options in the treatment of limb length discrepancy and axial deformity. The innovative Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) combines a rigid hexapod fixation system with the support of a web-based software program, and thus offer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manner, Hans Michael, Huebl, Michael, Radler, Christof, Ganger, Rudolf, Petje, Gert, Grill, Franz
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-006-0005-1
_version_ 1782165533937893376
author Manner, Hans Michael
Huebl, Michael
Radler, Christof
Ganger, Rudolf
Petje, Gert
Grill, Franz
author_facet Manner, Hans Michael
Huebl, Michael
Radler, Christof
Ganger, Rudolf
Petje, Gert
Grill, Franz
author_sort Manner, Hans Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Circular external fixators have several advantages over other surgical options in the treatment of limb length discrepancy and axial deformity. The innovative Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) combines a rigid hexapod fixation system with the support of a web-based software program, and thus offers the possibility of simultaneous corrections of multidirectional deformities. Whilst there is still some scepticism of many Ilizarov device users about the advantages of the TSF, the purpose of the study was to perform a comparison between the TSF and the Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) with regard to the accuracy of deformity correction in the lower limb. METHODS: Two hundred and eight consecutive deformity corrections in 155 patients were retrospectively evaluated. There were 79 cases treated with the IRF and 129 cases treated with the TSF. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 13.2 years (range; 2–49 years). Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and immediately after removal of the frames. The final result was compared to the preoperatively defined aim of the deformity correction. According to the treated count of dimensions, we differentiated four types of deformity corrections. The results were graded into four groups based on the persisting axial deviation after removal of the frame. RESULTS: The aim of the deformity correction was achieved in a total of 90.7% in the TSF group, compared to 55.7% in the IRF group. On the basis of the count of dimensions, the TSF achieved obviously higher percentages of excellent results (one dimension: TSF 100%; IRF 79.3%; two dimensions: TSF 91.8%; IRF 48.6%; three dimensions: TSF 91.1%; IRF 28.6%; four dimensions: TSF 66.7%; IRF 0%). In addition, the degree of the persisting deformity increased with the number of planes of the deformity correction. CONCLUSIONS: The TSF allowed for much higher precision in deformity correction compared to the IRF. In two-, three- and four-dimensional deformity corrections in particular, the TSF showed clear advantages. This may derive from the TSF-specific combination of a hexapod fixator with the support of an Internet-based software program, enabling precise simultaneous multiplanar deformity corrections.
format Text
id pubmed-2656701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26567012009-03-18 Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator Manner, Hans Michael Huebl, Michael Radler, Christof Ganger, Rudolf Petje, Gert Grill, Franz J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article PURPOSE: Circular external fixators have several advantages over other surgical options in the treatment of limb length discrepancy and axial deformity. The innovative Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) combines a rigid hexapod fixation system with the support of a web-based software program, and thus offers the possibility of simultaneous corrections of multidirectional deformities. Whilst there is still some scepticism of many Ilizarov device users about the advantages of the TSF, the purpose of the study was to perform a comparison between the TSF and the Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) with regard to the accuracy of deformity correction in the lower limb. METHODS: Two hundred and eight consecutive deformity corrections in 155 patients were retrospectively evaluated. There were 79 cases treated with the IRF and 129 cases treated with the TSF. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 13.2 years (range; 2–49 years). Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and immediately after removal of the frames. The final result was compared to the preoperatively defined aim of the deformity correction. According to the treated count of dimensions, we differentiated four types of deformity corrections. The results were graded into four groups based on the persisting axial deviation after removal of the frame. RESULTS: The aim of the deformity correction was achieved in a total of 90.7% in the TSF group, compared to 55.7% in the IRF group. On the basis of the count of dimensions, the TSF achieved obviously higher percentages of excellent results (one dimension: TSF 100%; IRF 79.3%; two dimensions: TSF 91.8%; IRF 48.6%; three dimensions: TSF 91.1%; IRF 28.6%; four dimensions: TSF 66.7%; IRF 0%). In addition, the degree of the persisting deformity increased with the number of planes of the deformity correction. CONCLUSIONS: The TSF allowed for much higher precision in deformity correction compared to the IRF. In two-, three- and four-dimensional deformity corrections in particular, the TSF showed clear advantages. This may derive from the TSF-specific combination of a hexapod fixator with the support of an Internet-based software program, enabling precise simultaneous multiplanar deformity corrections. Springer-Verlag 2006-12-30 2007-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2656701/ /pubmed/19308507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-006-0005-1 Text en © EPOS 2007
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Manner, Hans Michael
Huebl, Michael
Radler, Christof
Ganger, Rudolf
Petje, Gert
Grill, Franz
Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title_full Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title_fullStr Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title_short Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator
title_sort accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the taylor spatial frame with the ilizarov ring fixator
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-006-0005-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mannerhansmichael accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator
AT hueblmichael accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator
AT radlerchristof accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator
AT gangerrudolf accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator
AT petjegert accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator
AT grillfranz accuracyofcomplexlowerlimbdeformitycorrectionwithexternalfixationacomparisonofthetaylorspatialframewiththeilizarovringfixator