Cargando…

Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of trauma impact for the severity of whiplash injuries has mainly been investigated in sled- and crash-test studies. However, very little data exist for real-life accidents. Therefore, the predictive value of the trauma impact as assessed by the change in velocity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elbel, Martin, Kramer, Michael, Huber-Lang, Markus, Hartwig, Erich, Dehner, Christoph
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19267940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-5
_version_ 1782165558157901824
author Elbel, Martin
Kramer, Michael
Huber-Lang, Markus
Hartwig, Erich
Dehner, Christoph
author_facet Elbel, Martin
Kramer, Michael
Huber-Lang, Markus
Hartwig, Erich
Dehner, Christoph
author_sort Elbel, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The predictive value of trauma impact for the severity of whiplash injuries has mainly been investigated in sled- and crash-test studies. However, very little data exist for real-life accidents. Therefore, the predictive value of the trauma impact as assessed by the change in velocity of the car due to the collision (ΔV) for the resulting cervical spine injuries were investigated in 57 cases after real-life car accidents. METHODS: ΔV was determined for every car and clinical findings related to the cervical spine were assessed and classified according to the Quebec Task Force (QTF). RESULTS: In our study, 32 (56%) subjects did not complain about symptoms and were therefore classified as QTF grade 0; 25 (44%) patients complained of neck pain: 8 (14%) were classified as QTF grade I, 6 (10%) as QTF grade II, and 11 (19%) as QTF grade IV. Only a slight correlation (r = 0.55) was found between the reported pain and ΔV. No relevant correlation was found between ΔV and the neck disability index (r = 0.46) and between ΔV and the QTF grade (r = 0.45) for any of the collision types. There was no ΔV threshold associated with acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the prognosis of a cervical spine injury. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that ΔV is not a conclusive predictor for cervical spine injury in real-life motor vehicle accidents. This is of importance for surgeons involved in medicolegal expertise jobs as well as patients who suffer from whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) after motor vehicle accidents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study complied with applicable German law and with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the institutional ethics commission.
format Text
id pubmed-2657117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26571172009-03-18 Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury? Elbel, Martin Kramer, Michael Huber-Lang, Markus Hartwig, Erich Dehner, Christoph Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: The predictive value of trauma impact for the severity of whiplash injuries has mainly been investigated in sled- and crash-test studies. However, very little data exist for real-life accidents. Therefore, the predictive value of the trauma impact as assessed by the change in velocity of the car due to the collision (ΔV) for the resulting cervical spine injuries were investigated in 57 cases after real-life car accidents. METHODS: ΔV was determined for every car and clinical findings related to the cervical spine were assessed and classified according to the Quebec Task Force (QTF). RESULTS: In our study, 32 (56%) subjects did not complain about symptoms and were therefore classified as QTF grade 0; 25 (44%) patients complained of neck pain: 8 (14%) were classified as QTF grade I, 6 (10%) as QTF grade II, and 11 (19%) as QTF grade IV. Only a slight correlation (r = 0.55) was found between the reported pain and ΔV. No relevant correlation was found between ΔV and the neck disability index (r = 0.46) and between ΔV and the QTF grade (r = 0.45) for any of the collision types. There was no ΔV threshold associated with acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the prognosis of a cervical spine injury. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that ΔV is not a conclusive predictor for cervical spine injury in real-life motor vehicle accidents. This is of importance for surgeons involved in medicolegal expertise jobs as well as patients who suffer from whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) after motor vehicle accidents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study complied with applicable German law and with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the institutional ethics commission. BioMed Central 2009-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2657117/ /pubmed/19267940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elbel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Elbel, Martin
Kramer, Michael
Huber-Lang, Markus
Hartwig, Erich
Dehner, Christoph
Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title_full Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title_fullStr Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title_full_unstemmed Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title_short Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
title_sort deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions – a sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19267940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-5
work_keys_str_mv AT elbelmartin decelerationduringreallifemotorvehiclecollisionsasensitivepredictorfortheriskofsustainingacervicalspineinjury
AT kramermichael decelerationduringreallifemotorvehiclecollisionsasensitivepredictorfortheriskofsustainingacervicalspineinjury
AT huberlangmarkus decelerationduringreallifemotorvehiclecollisionsasensitivepredictorfortheriskofsustainingacervicalspineinjury
AT hartwigerich decelerationduringreallifemotorvehiclecollisionsasensitivepredictorfortheriskofsustainingacervicalspineinjury
AT dehnerchristoph decelerationduringreallifemotorvehiclecollisionsasensitivepredictorfortheriskofsustainingacervicalspineinjury