Cargando…
Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality
BACKGROUND: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two continuous screening tests, a common approach is to test the difference between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. After study participants are screened with both screening tests, the disease status is determined...
Autores principales: | Glueck, Deborah H, Lamb, Molly M, O'Donnell, Colin I, Ringham, Brandy M, Brinton, John T, Muller, Keith E, Lewin, John M, Alonzo, Todd A, Pisano, Etta D |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes
por: Ringham, Brandy M, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series
por: Ringham, Brandy M, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence
por: Brinton, John T., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A power approximation for the Kenward and Roger Wald test in the linear mixed model
por: Kreidler, Sarah M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor mesenchymal neoplasms: the offspring that choose the wrong path
por: Machairiotis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2013)