Cargando…
Board review course effect on resident in-training examination
BACKGROUND: The in-training examination is a national and yearly exam administered by the American Board of Emergency Medicine to all emergency medicine residents in the USA. The purpose of the examination is to evaluate a resident’s progress toward obtaining the fundamental knowledge to practice in...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-008-0068-5 |
_version_ | 1782165578567385088 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, David |
author_facet | Cheng, David |
author_sort | Cheng, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The in-training examination is a national and yearly exam administered by the American Board of Emergency Medicine to all emergency medicine residents in the USA. The purpose of the examination is to evaluate a resident’s progress toward obtaining the fundamental knowledge to practice independent emergency medicine. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a 40 hour board review lecture course on the resident in-training examination in emergency medicine. METHODS: A 40 hour board review lecture course was designed and implemented during the weekly 5 hour long resident conferences during the 8 weeks preceding the in-training examination date in 2006. Attendance was mandatory at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standard of 70% or greater. A positive result was considered to be a 10% increase or greater in the resident’s individual national class percentile ranking among their national peers for their class year for the emergency medicine in-training examination. A resident was excluded from the study if there was no 2005 in-training examination score for self-comparison. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Of 16 residents, 1 (6.25%; 95% CI: 0–18%) showed a positive result of increasing their national class percentile ranking by 10% or greater. For the PGY2, one of the eight had a positive result (12.5%; 95% CI: 0–35.4%). For PGY3, no resident (0%; 95% CI: 0–35.4%) had a positive result. CONCLUSIONS: A 40 hour board review lecture course has no positive effect on improving a resident’s in-training examination score. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2657258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26572582009-03-25 Board review course effect on resident in-training examination Cheng, David Int J Emerg Med Brief Research Report BACKGROUND: The in-training examination is a national and yearly exam administered by the American Board of Emergency Medicine to all emergency medicine residents in the USA. The purpose of the examination is to evaluate a resident’s progress toward obtaining the fundamental knowledge to practice independent emergency medicine. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a 40 hour board review lecture course on the resident in-training examination in emergency medicine. METHODS: A 40 hour board review lecture course was designed and implemented during the weekly 5 hour long resident conferences during the 8 weeks preceding the in-training examination date in 2006. Attendance was mandatory at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standard of 70% or greater. A positive result was considered to be a 10% increase or greater in the resident’s individual national class percentile ranking among their national peers for their class year for the emergency medicine in-training examination. A resident was excluded from the study if there was no 2005 in-training examination score for self-comparison. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Of 16 residents, 1 (6.25%; 95% CI: 0–18%) showed a positive result of increasing their national class percentile ranking by 10% or greater. For the PGY2, one of the eight had a positive result (12.5%; 95% CI: 0–35.4%). For PGY3, no resident (0%; 95% CI: 0–35.4%) had a positive result. CONCLUSIONS: A 40 hour board review lecture course has no positive effect on improving a resident’s in-training examination score. Springer-Verlag 2008-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2657258/ /pubmed/19384650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-008-0068-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2008 |
spellingShingle | Brief Research Report Cheng, David Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title | Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title_full | Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title_fullStr | Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title_full_unstemmed | Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title_short | Board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
title_sort | board review course effect on resident in-training examination |
topic | Brief Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-008-0068-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengdavid boardreviewcourseeffectonresidentintrainingexamination |