Cargando…

A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shyam Kumar, A. J., Parmar, V., Ahmed, S., Kar, S., Harper, W. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8
_version_ 1782165588761640960
author Shyam Kumar, A. J.
Parmar, V.
Ahmed, S.
Kar, S.
Harper, W. M.
author_facet Shyam Kumar, A. J.
Parmar, V.
Ahmed, S.
Kar, S.
Harper, W. M.
author_sort Shyam Kumar, A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation of grip strength with the elbow flexed at 90° with the subject in the sitting position . As far as we are aware, there have been no reports in English literature regarding studies done to evaluate the position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 healthy adults (16 males, 29 females) participated in this study. A computerised handgrip analyser was used to measure the peak strength in the non-dominant hand, followed by measurement of the grip endurance. These measurements were conducted in 90° of flexion and full extension of the elbow for each participant. RESULTS: Mean endurance in flexion was 71.0 N (SD 22.9) and in extension was 68.7 N (SD 27.4). Mean peak grip strength in flexion was 262.8 N (SD 73.1) and in extension was 264.1 N (SD 82.0). T test analysis showed no statistical significance for elbow positions for grip endurance (P = 0.67) and peak gip strength (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Practical implications from this study are that grip endurance training can be undertaken with the elbow in 90° of flexion or full extension.
format Text
id pubmed-2657329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26573292009-03-25 A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions Shyam Kumar, A. J. Parmar, V. Ahmed, S. Kar, S. Harper, W. M. J Orthop Traumatol Brief Communication BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation of grip strength with the elbow flexed at 90° with the subject in the sitting position . As far as we are aware, there have been no reports in English literature regarding studies done to evaluate the position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 healthy adults (16 males, 29 females) participated in this study. A computerised handgrip analyser was used to measure the peak strength in the non-dominant hand, followed by measurement of the grip endurance. These measurements were conducted in 90° of flexion and full extension of the elbow for each participant. RESULTS: Mean endurance in flexion was 71.0 N (SD 22.9) and in extension was 68.7 N (SD 27.4). Mean peak grip strength in flexion was 262.8 N (SD 73.1) and in extension was 264.1 N (SD 82.0). T test analysis showed no statistical significance for elbow positions for grip endurance (P = 0.67) and peak gip strength (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Practical implications from this study are that grip endurance training can be undertaken with the elbow in 90° of flexion or full extension. Springer Milan 2008-07-02 2008-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2657329/ /pubmed/19384487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Shyam Kumar, A. J.
Parmar, V.
Ahmed, S.
Kar, S.
Harper, W. M.
A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title_full A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title_fullStr A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title_full_unstemmed A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title_short A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
title_sort study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8
work_keys_str_mv AT shyamkumaraj astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT parmarv astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT ahmeds astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT kars astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT harperwm astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT shyamkumaraj studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT parmarv studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT ahmeds studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT kars studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions
AT harperwm studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions