Cargando…
A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8 |
_version_ | 1782165588761640960 |
---|---|
author | Shyam Kumar, A. J. Parmar, V. Ahmed, S. Kar, S. Harper, W. M. |
author_facet | Shyam Kumar, A. J. Parmar, V. Ahmed, S. Kar, S. Harper, W. M. |
author_sort | Shyam Kumar, A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation of grip strength with the elbow flexed at 90° with the subject in the sitting position . As far as we are aware, there have been no reports in English literature regarding studies done to evaluate the position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 healthy adults (16 males, 29 females) participated in this study. A computerised handgrip analyser was used to measure the peak strength in the non-dominant hand, followed by measurement of the grip endurance. These measurements were conducted in 90° of flexion and full extension of the elbow for each participant. RESULTS: Mean endurance in flexion was 71.0 N (SD 22.9) and in extension was 68.7 N (SD 27.4). Mean peak grip strength in flexion was 262.8 N (SD 73.1) and in extension was 264.1 N (SD 82.0). T test analysis showed no statistical significance for elbow positions for grip endurance (P = 0.67) and peak gip strength (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Practical implications from this study are that grip endurance training can be undertaken with the elbow in 90° of flexion or full extension. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2657329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26573292009-03-25 A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions Shyam Kumar, A. J. Parmar, V. Ahmed, S. Kar, S. Harper, W. M. J Orthop Traumatol Brief Communication BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was twofold. The first was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. The second was to investigate the optimum position of the elbow while measuring peak grip strength. The American Society of Hand Therapists advocate estimation of grip strength with the elbow flexed at 90° with the subject in the sitting position . As far as we are aware, there have been no reports in English literature regarding studies done to evaluate the position of the elbow while measuring grip endurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 healthy adults (16 males, 29 females) participated in this study. A computerised handgrip analyser was used to measure the peak strength in the non-dominant hand, followed by measurement of the grip endurance. These measurements were conducted in 90° of flexion and full extension of the elbow for each participant. RESULTS: Mean endurance in flexion was 71.0 N (SD 22.9) and in extension was 68.7 N (SD 27.4). Mean peak grip strength in flexion was 262.8 N (SD 73.1) and in extension was 264.1 N (SD 82.0). T test analysis showed no statistical significance for elbow positions for grip endurance (P = 0.67) and peak gip strength (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Practical implications from this study are that grip endurance training can be undertaken with the elbow in 90° of flexion or full extension. Springer Milan 2008-07-02 2008-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2657329/ /pubmed/19384487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008 |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Shyam Kumar, A. J. Parmar, V. Ahmed, S. Kar, S. Harper, W. M. A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title | A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title_full | A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title_fullStr | A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title_full_unstemmed | A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title_short | A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
title_sort | study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0020-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shyamkumaraj astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT parmarv astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT ahmeds astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT kars astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT harperwm astudyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT shyamkumaraj studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT parmarv studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT ahmeds studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT kars studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions AT harperwm studyofgripenduranceandstrenghindifferentelbowpositions |