Cargando…

Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50

AIM: To compare the 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) excursion following a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated twice daily with human insulin mix 50 vs. insulin lispro mix 50 (LM50). METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, crossover comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Y, Li, G, Li, Y, Guo, X, Yuan, G, Gong, Q, Yan, L, Zheng, Y, Zhang, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2658027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01850.x
_version_ 1782165634515206144
author Gao, Y
Li, G
Li, Y
Guo, X
Yuan, G
Gong, Q
Yan, L
Zheng, Y
Zhang, J
author_facet Gao, Y
Li, G
Li, Y
Guo, X
Yuan, G
Gong, Q
Yan, L
Zheng, Y
Zhang, J
author_sort Gao, Y
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) excursion following a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated twice daily with human insulin mix 50 vs. insulin lispro mix 50 (LM50). METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, crossover comparison of two insulin treatments for two 12-week treatment periods in 120 Chinese patients. One- and 2-h PPBG and excursion values were obtained following a standardised test meal. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin dose, rate of hypoglycaemia and safety data were obtained. A crossover analysis using SAS Proc MIXED was employed. RESULTS: Mean 2-h PPBG excursion decreased from 6.32 ± 3.07 mmol/l at baseline to 3.47 ± 2.97 mmol/l at end-point in the LM50 group, and from 6.31 ± 2.88 at baseline to 5.02 ± 3.32 mmol/l at end-point in the human insulin mix 50 group (p < 0.001). Two-hour PPBG (p = 0.004) and 1-h PPBG excursion (p < 0.001) were significantly lower with LM50 as compared with human insulin mix 50. Both treatment groups were equivalent for HbA1c control, 1-h PPBG and insulin dose requirements. Mean FBG was higher with LM50 than with human insulin mix 50 (p = 0.023). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and hypoglycaemia rate per 30 days were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin lispro mix 50 provided better postprandial glycaemic control compared with human insulin mix 50 while providing the convenience of injecting immediately before meals. Both treatments were generally well tolerated by all randomly assigned patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2658027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26580272009-03-30 Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50 Gao, Y Li, G Li, Y Guo, X Yuan, G Gong, Q Yan, L Zheng, Y Zhang, J Int J Clin Pract Original Paper AIM: To compare the 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) excursion following a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated twice daily with human insulin mix 50 vs. insulin lispro mix 50 (LM50). METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, crossover comparison of two insulin treatments for two 12-week treatment periods in 120 Chinese patients. One- and 2-h PPBG and excursion values were obtained following a standardised test meal. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin dose, rate of hypoglycaemia and safety data were obtained. A crossover analysis using SAS Proc MIXED was employed. RESULTS: Mean 2-h PPBG excursion decreased from 6.32 ± 3.07 mmol/l at baseline to 3.47 ± 2.97 mmol/l at end-point in the LM50 group, and from 6.31 ± 2.88 at baseline to 5.02 ± 3.32 mmol/l at end-point in the human insulin mix 50 group (p < 0.001). Two-hour PPBG (p = 0.004) and 1-h PPBG excursion (p < 0.001) were significantly lower with LM50 as compared with human insulin mix 50. Both treatment groups were equivalent for HbA1c control, 1-h PPBG and insulin dose requirements. Mean FBG was higher with LM50 than with human insulin mix 50 (p = 0.023). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and hypoglycaemia rate per 30 days were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin lispro mix 50 provided better postprandial glycaemic control compared with human insulin mix 50 while providing the convenience of injecting immediately before meals. Both treatments were generally well tolerated by all randomly assigned patients. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2658027/ /pubmed/18657196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01850.x Text en © 2008 Eli Lilly Asia, Inc. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gao, Y
Li, G
Li, Y
Guo, X
Yuan, G
Gong, Q
Yan, L
Zheng, Y
Zhang, J
Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title_full Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title_fullStr Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title_full_unstemmed Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title_short Postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
title_sort postprandial blood glucose response to a standard test meal in insulin-requiring patients with diabetes treated with insulin lispro mix 50 or human insulin mix 50
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2658027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01850.x
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoy postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT lig postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT liy postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT guox postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT yuang postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT gongq postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT yanl postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT zhengy postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50
AT zhangj postprandialbloodglucoseresponsetoastandardtestmealininsulinrequiringpatientswithdiabetestreatedwithinsulinlispromix50orhumaninsulinmix50