Cargando…

National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes

BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous national debate between 1999–2001 the federal patients’ bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paasche-Orlow, Michael K., Jacob, Dan M., Hochhauser, Mark, Parker, Ruth M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
_version_ 1782165660436004864
author Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Jacob, Dan M.
Hochhauser, Mark
Parker, Ruth M.
author_facet Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Jacob, Dan M.
Hochhauser, Mark
Parker, Ruth M.
author_sort Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous national debate between 1999–2001 the federal patients’ bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law. METHODS: State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association’s (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas. RESULTS: Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states’ statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0). CONCLUSIONS: While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.
format Text
id pubmed-2659155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26591552009-04-01 National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. Jacob, Dan M. Hochhauser, Mark Parker, Ruth M. J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous national debate between 1999–2001 the federal patients’ bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law. METHODS: State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association’s (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas. RESULTS: Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states’ statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0). CONCLUSIONS: While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read. Springer-Verlag 2009-02-03 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2659155/ /pubmed/19189192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2009
spellingShingle Original Article
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Jacob, Dan M.
Hochhauser, Mark
Parker, Ruth M.
National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title_full National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title_fullStr National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title_full_unstemmed National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title_short National Survey of Patients’ Bill of Rights Statutes
title_sort national survey of patients’ bill of rights statutes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
work_keys_str_mv AT paascheorlowmichaelk nationalsurveyofpatientsbillofrightsstatutes
AT jacobdanm nationalsurveyofpatientsbillofrightsstatutes
AT hochhausermark nationalsurveyofpatientsbillofrightsstatutes
AT parkerruthm nationalsurveyofpatientsbillofrightsstatutes