Cargando…

Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study

Objective To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units. Design Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff. Setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valentin, Andreas, Capuzzo, Maurizia, Guidet, Bertrand, Moreno, Rui, Metnitz, Barbara, Bauer, Peter, Metnitz, Philipp
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19282436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b814
_version_ 1782165663549227008
author Valentin, Andreas
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Guidet, Bertrand
Moreno, Rui
Metnitz, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Metnitz, Philipp
author_facet Valentin, Andreas
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Guidet, Bertrand
Moreno, Rui
Metnitz, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Metnitz, Philipp
author_sort Valentin, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units. Design Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff. Setting 113 intensive care units in 27 countries. Participants 1328 adults in intensive care. Main outcome measures Number of errors; impact of errors; distribution of error characteristics; distribution of contributing and preventive factors. Results 861 errors affecting 441 patients were reported: 74.5 (95% confidence interval 69.5 to 79.4) events per 100 patient days. Three quarters of the errors were classified as errors of omission. Twelve patients (0.9% of the study population) experienced permanent harm or died because of medication errors at the administration stage. In a multiple logistic regression with patients as the unit of analysis, odds ratios for the occurrence of at least one parenteral medication error were raised for number of organ failures (odds ratio per increase of one organ failure: 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.34); use of any intravenous medication (yes v no: 2.73, 1.39 to 5.36); number of parenteral administrations (per increase of one parenteral administration: 1.06, 1.04 to 1.08); typical interventions in patients in intensive care (yes v no: 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96); larger intensive care unit (per increase of one bed: 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02); number of patients per nurse (per increase of one patient: 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64); and occupancy rate (per 10% increase: 1.03, 1.00 to 1.05). Odds ratios for the occurrence of parenteral medication errors were decreased for presence of basic monitoring (yes v no: 0.19, 0.07 to 0.49); an existing critical incident reporting system (yes v no: 0.69, 0.53 to 0.90); an established routine of checks at nurses’ shift change (yes v no: 0.68, 0.52 to 0.90); and an increased ratio of patient turnover to the size of the unit (per increase of one patient: 0.73, 0.57 to 0.93). Conclusions Parenteral medication errors at the administration stage are common and a serious safety problem in intensive care units. With the increasing complexity of care in critically ill patients, organisational factors such as error reporting systems and routine checks can reduce the risk for such errors.
format Text
id pubmed-2659290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26592902009-03-23 Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study Valentin, Andreas Capuzzo, Maurizia Guidet, Bertrand Moreno, Rui Metnitz, Barbara Bauer, Peter Metnitz, Philipp BMJ Research Objective To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units. Design Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff. Setting 113 intensive care units in 27 countries. Participants 1328 adults in intensive care. Main outcome measures Number of errors; impact of errors; distribution of error characteristics; distribution of contributing and preventive factors. Results 861 errors affecting 441 patients were reported: 74.5 (95% confidence interval 69.5 to 79.4) events per 100 patient days. Three quarters of the errors were classified as errors of omission. Twelve patients (0.9% of the study population) experienced permanent harm or died because of medication errors at the administration stage. In a multiple logistic regression with patients as the unit of analysis, odds ratios for the occurrence of at least one parenteral medication error were raised for number of organ failures (odds ratio per increase of one organ failure: 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.34); use of any intravenous medication (yes v no: 2.73, 1.39 to 5.36); number of parenteral administrations (per increase of one parenteral administration: 1.06, 1.04 to 1.08); typical interventions in patients in intensive care (yes v no: 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96); larger intensive care unit (per increase of one bed: 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02); number of patients per nurse (per increase of one patient: 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64); and occupancy rate (per 10% increase: 1.03, 1.00 to 1.05). Odds ratios for the occurrence of parenteral medication errors were decreased for presence of basic monitoring (yes v no: 0.19, 0.07 to 0.49); an existing critical incident reporting system (yes v no: 0.69, 0.53 to 0.90); an established routine of checks at nurses’ shift change (yes v no: 0.68, 0.52 to 0.90); and an increased ratio of patient turnover to the size of the unit (per increase of one patient: 0.73, 0.57 to 0.93). Conclusions Parenteral medication errors at the administration stage are common and a serious safety problem in intensive care units. With the increasing complexity of care in critically ill patients, organisational factors such as error reporting systems and routine checks can reduce the risk for such errors. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2659290/ /pubmed/19282436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b814 Text en © Valentin et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Valentin, Andreas
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Guidet, Bertrand
Moreno, Rui
Metnitz, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Metnitz, Philipp
Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title_full Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title_fullStr Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title_short Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
title_sort errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19282436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b814
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinandreas errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT capuzzomaurizia errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT guidetbertrand errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT morenorui errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT metnitzbarbara errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT bauerpeter errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy
AT metnitzphilipp errorsinadministrationofparenteraldrugsinintensivecareunitsmultinationalprospectivestudy