Cargando…

The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago

BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ovenden, Jenny R, Kashiwagi, Tom, Broderick, Damien, Giles, Jenny, Salini, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40
_version_ 1782165710439448576
author Ovenden, Jenny R
Kashiwagi, Tom
Broderick, Damien
Giles, Jenny
Salini, John
author_facet Ovenden, Jenny R
Kashiwagi, Tom
Broderick, Damien
Giles, Jenny
Salini, John
author_sort Ovenden, Jenny R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats including shallow continental shelf waters, oceanic trenches and numerous offshore islands. Both countries exploit a variety of fisheries species, including whaler (Carcharhinus spp.) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.). Despite their differences in social and financial arrangements, the two countries are motivated to develop complementary co-management practices to achieve resource sustainability. An essential starting point is knowledge of the degree of population subdivision, and hence fisheries stock status, in exploited species. RESULTS: Populations of four commercially harvested shark species (Carcharhinus obscurus, Carcharhinus sorrah, Prionace glauca, Sphyrna lewini) were sampled from northern Australia and central Indonesia. Neutral genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and allelic variation at co-dominant microsatellite loci) revealed genetic subdivision between Australian and Indonesian populations of C. sorrah. Further research is needed to address the possibility of genetic subdivision among C. obscurus populations. There was no evidence of genetic subdivision for P. glauca and S. lewini populations, but the sampling represented a relatively small part of their distributional range. For these species, more detailed analyses of population genetic structure is recommended in the future. CONCLUSION: Cooperative management between Australia and Indonesia is the best option at present for P. glauca and S. lewini, while C. sorrah and C. obscurus should be managed independently. On-going research on these and other exploited shark and ray species is strongly recommended. Biological and ecological similarity between species may not be a predictor of population genetic structure, so species-specific studies are recommended to provide new data to assist with sustainable fisheries management.
format Text
id pubmed-2660307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26603072009-03-25 The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago Ovenden, Jenny R Kashiwagi, Tom Broderick, Damien Giles, Jenny Salini, John BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats including shallow continental shelf waters, oceanic trenches and numerous offshore islands. Both countries exploit a variety of fisheries species, including whaler (Carcharhinus spp.) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.). Despite their differences in social and financial arrangements, the two countries are motivated to develop complementary co-management practices to achieve resource sustainability. An essential starting point is knowledge of the degree of population subdivision, and hence fisheries stock status, in exploited species. RESULTS: Populations of four commercially harvested shark species (Carcharhinus obscurus, Carcharhinus sorrah, Prionace glauca, Sphyrna lewini) were sampled from northern Australia and central Indonesia. Neutral genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and allelic variation at co-dominant microsatellite loci) revealed genetic subdivision between Australian and Indonesian populations of C. sorrah. Further research is needed to address the possibility of genetic subdivision among C. obscurus populations. There was no evidence of genetic subdivision for P. glauca and S. lewini populations, but the sampling represented a relatively small part of their distributional range. For these species, more detailed analyses of population genetic structure is recommended in the future. CONCLUSION: Cooperative management between Australia and Indonesia is the best option at present for P. glauca and S. lewini, while C. sorrah and C. obscurus should be managed independently. On-going research on these and other exploited shark and ray species is strongly recommended. Biological and ecological similarity between species may not be a predictor of population genetic structure, so species-specific studies are recommended to provide new data to assist with sustainable fisheries management. BioMed Central 2009-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2660307/ /pubmed/19216767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ovenden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ovenden, Jenny R
Kashiwagi, Tom
Broderick, Damien
Giles, Jenny
Salini, John
The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title_full The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title_fullStr The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title_full_unstemmed The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title_short The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
title_sort extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the indo-australian archipelago
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40
work_keys_str_mv AT ovendenjennyr theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT kashiwagitom theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT broderickdamien theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT gilesjenny theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT salinijohn theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT ovendenjennyr extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT kashiwagitom extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT broderickdamien extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT gilesjenny extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago
AT salinijohn extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago