Cargando…
The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago
BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats includin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40 |
_version_ | 1782165710439448576 |
---|---|
author | Ovenden, Jenny R Kashiwagi, Tom Broderick, Damien Giles, Jenny Salini, John |
author_facet | Ovenden, Jenny R Kashiwagi, Tom Broderick, Damien Giles, Jenny Salini, John |
author_sort | Ovenden, Jenny R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats including shallow continental shelf waters, oceanic trenches and numerous offshore islands. Both countries exploit a variety of fisheries species, including whaler (Carcharhinus spp.) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.). Despite their differences in social and financial arrangements, the two countries are motivated to develop complementary co-management practices to achieve resource sustainability. An essential starting point is knowledge of the degree of population subdivision, and hence fisheries stock status, in exploited species. RESULTS: Populations of four commercially harvested shark species (Carcharhinus obscurus, Carcharhinus sorrah, Prionace glauca, Sphyrna lewini) were sampled from northern Australia and central Indonesia. Neutral genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and allelic variation at co-dominant microsatellite loci) revealed genetic subdivision between Australian and Indonesian populations of C. sorrah. Further research is needed to address the possibility of genetic subdivision among C. obscurus populations. There was no evidence of genetic subdivision for P. glauca and S. lewini populations, but the sampling represented a relatively small part of their distributional range. For these species, more detailed analyses of population genetic structure is recommended in the future. CONCLUSION: Cooperative management between Australia and Indonesia is the best option at present for P. glauca and S. lewini, while C. sorrah and C. obscurus should be managed independently. On-going research on these and other exploited shark and ray species is strongly recommended. Biological and ecological similarity between species may not be a predictor of population genetic structure, so species-specific studies are recommended to provide new data to assist with sustainable fisheries management. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2660307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26603072009-03-25 The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago Ovenden, Jenny R Kashiwagi, Tom Broderick, Damien Giles, Jenny Salini, John BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats including shallow continental shelf waters, oceanic trenches and numerous offshore islands. Both countries exploit a variety of fisheries species, including whaler (Carcharhinus spp.) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.). Despite their differences in social and financial arrangements, the two countries are motivated to develop complementary co-management practices to achieve resource sustainability. An essential starting point is knowledge of the degree of population subdivision, and hence fisheries stock status, in exploited species. RESULTS: Populations of four commercially harvested shark species (Carcharhinus obscurus, Carcharhinus sorrah, Prionace glauca, Sphyrna lewini) were sampled from northern Australia and central Indonesia. Neutral genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and allelic variation at co-dominant microsatellite loci) revealed genetic subdivision between Australian and Indonesian populations of C. sorrah. Further research is needed to address the possibility of genetic subdivision among C. obscurus populations. There was no evidence of genetic subdivision for P. glauca and S. lewini populations, but the sampling represented a relatively small part of their distributional range. For these species, more detailed analyses of population genetic structure is recommended in the future. CONCLUSION: Cooperative management between Australia and Indonesia is the best option at present for P. glauca and S. lewini, while C. sorrah and C. obscurus should be managed independently. On-going research on these and other exploited shark and ray species is strongly recommended. Biological and ecological similarity between species may not be a predictor of population genetic structure, so species-specific studies are recommended to provide new data to assist with sustainable fisheries management. BioMed Central 2009-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2660307/ /pubmed/19216767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ovenden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ovenden, Jenny R Kashiwagi, Tom Broderick, Damien Giles, Jenny Salini, John The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title | The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title_full | The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title_fullStr | The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title_full_unstemmed | The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title_short | The extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the Indo-Australian archipelago |
title_sort | extent of population genetic subdivision differs among four co-distributed shark species in the indo-australian archipelago |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ovendenjennyr theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT kashiwagitom theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT broderickdamien theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT gilesjenny theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT salinijohn theextentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT ovendenjennyr extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT kashiwagitom extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT broderickdamien extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT gilesjenny extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago AT salinijohn extentofpopulationgeneticsubdivisiondiffersamongfourcodistributedsharkspeciesintheindoaustralianarchipelago |