Cargando…
Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19272154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5 |
_version_ | 1782165711624339456 |
---|---|
author | Lorenz, Aaron J Anex, Rob P Isci, Asli Coors, James G de Leon, Natalia Weimer, Paul J |
author_facet | Lorenz, Aaron J Anex, Rob P Isci, Asli Coors, James G de Leon, Natalia Weimer, Paul J |
author_sort | Lorenz, Aaron J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements could be used to estimate ethanol yield of maize stover as measured by a simplified pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation assay. Twelve maize varieties selected to be diverse for stover digestibility and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Variation in ethanol yield was driven by glucan convertibility rather than by glucan content. Convertibility was highly correlated with ruminal digestibility and lignin content. There was no relationship between structural carbohydrate content (glucan and neutral detergent fiber) and ethanol yield. However, when these variables were included in multiple regression equations including convertibility or neutral detergent fiber digestibility, their partial regression coefficients were significant and positive. A regression model including both neutral detergent fiber and its ruminal digestibility explained 95% of the variation in ethanol yield. CONCLUSION: Forage quality and composition measurements may be used to predict cellulosic ethanol yield to guide biofeedstock improvement through agronomic research and plant breeding. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2660312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26603122009-03-25 Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover Lorenz, Aaron J Anex, Rob P Isci, Asli Coors, James G de Leon, Natalia Weimer, Paul J Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements could be used to estimate ethanol yield of maize stover as measured by a simplified pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation assay. Twelve maize varieties selected to be diverse for stover digestibility and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Variation in ethanol yield was driven by glucan convertibility rather than by glucan content. Convertibility was highly correlated with ruminal digestibility and lignin content. There was no relationship between structural carbohydrate content (glucan and neutral detergent fiber) and ethanol yield. However, when these variables were included in multiple regression equations including convertibility or neutral detergent fiber digestibility, their partial regression coefficients were significant and positive. A regression model including both neutral detergent fiber and its ruminal digestibility explained 95% of the variation in ethanol yield. CONCLUSION: Forage quality and composition measurements may be used to predict cellulosic ethanol yield to guide biofeedstock improvement through agronomic research and plant breeding. BioMed Central 2009-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2660312/ /pubmed/19272154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lorenz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lorenz, Aaron J Anex, Rob P Isci, Asli Coors, James G de Leon, Natalia Weimer, Paul J Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title | Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title_full | Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title_fullStr | Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title_full_unstemmed | Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title_short | Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover |
title_sort | forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (zea mays l.) stover |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19272154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzaaronj foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover AT anexrobp foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover AT isciasli foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover AT coorsjamesg foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover AT deleonnatalia foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover AT weimerpaulj foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover |