Cargando…

Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover

BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenz, Aaron J, Anex, Rob P, Isci, Asli, Coors, James G, de Leon, Natalia, Weimer, Paul J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19272154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5
_version_ 1782165711624339456
author Lorenz, Aaron J
Anex, Rob P
Isci, Asli
Coors, James G
de Leon, Natalia
Weimer, Paul J
author_facet Lorenz, Aaron J
Anex, Rob P
Isci, Asli
Coors, James G
de Leon, Natalia
Weimer, Paul J
author_sort Lorenz, Aaron J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements could be used to estimate ethanol yield of maize stover as measured by a simplified pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation assay. Twelve maize varieties selected to be diverse for stover digestibility and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Variation in ethanol yield was driven by glucan convertibility rather than by glucan content. Convertibility was highly correlated with ruminal digestibility and lignin content. There was no relationship between structural carbohydrate content (glucan and neutral detergent fiber) and ethanol yield. However, when these variables were included in multiple regression equations including convertibility or neutral detergent fiber digestibility, their partial regression coefficients were significant and positive. A regression model including both neutral detergent fiber and its ruminal digestibility explained 95% of the variation in ethanol yield. CONCLUSION: Forage quality and composition measurements may be used to predict cellulosic ethanol yield to guide biofeedstock improvement through agronomic research and plant breeding.
format Text
id pubmed-2660312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26603122009-03-25 Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover Lorenz, Aaron J Anex, Rob P Isci, Asli Coors, James G de Leon, Natalia Weimer, Paul J Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Improvement of biofeedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol production will be facilitated by inexpensive and rapid methods of evaluation, such as those already employed in the field of ruminant nutrition. Our objective was to evaluate whether forage quality and compositional measurements could be used to estimate ethanol yield of maize stover as measured by a simplified pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation assay. Twelve maize varieties selected to be diverse for stover digestibility and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Variation in ethanol yield was driven by glucan convertibility rather than by glucan content. Convertibility was highly correlated with ruminal digestibility and lignin content. There was no relationship between structural carbohydrate content (glucan and neutral detergent fiber) and ethanol yield. However, when these variables were included in multiple regression equations including convertibility or neutral detergent fiber digestibility, their partial regression coefficients were significant and positive. A regression model including both neutral detergent fiber and its ruminal digestibility explained 95% of the variation in ethanol yield. CONCLUSION: Forage quality and composition measurements may be used to predict cellulosic ethanol yield to guide biofeedstock improvement through agronomic research and plant breeding. BioMed Central 2009-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2660312/ /pubmed/19272154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lorenz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lorenz, Aaron J
Anex, Rob P
Isci, Asli
Coors, James G
de Leon, Natalia
Weimer, Paul J
Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title_full Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title_fullStr Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title_full_unstemmed Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title_short Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover
title_sort forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (zea mays l.) stover
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19272154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzaaronj foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover
AT anexrobp foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover
AT isciasli foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover
AT coorsjamesg foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover
AT deleonnatalia foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover
AT weimerpaulj foragequalityandcompositionmeasurementsaspredictorsofethanolyieldfrommaizezeamayslstover