Cargando…

Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA

BACKGROUND: A major challenge for ancient DNA (aDNA) studies on insect remains is that sampling procedures involve at least partial destruction of the specimens. A recent extraction protocol reveals the possibility of obtaining DNA from past insect remains without causing visual morphological damage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomsen, Philip Francis, Elias, Scott, Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Haile, James, Munch, Kasper, Kuzmina, Svetlana, Froese, Duane G., Sher, Andrei, Holdaway, Richard N., Willerslev, Eske
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005048
_version_ 1782165728783237120
author Thomsen, Philip Francis
Elias, Scott
Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
Haile, James
Munch, Kasper
Kuzmina, Svetlana
Froese, Duane G.
Sher, Andrei
Holdaway, Richard N.
Willerslev, Eske
author_facet Thomsen, Philip Francis
Elias, Scott
Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
Haile, James
Munch, Kasper
Kuzmina, Svetlana
Froese, Duane G.
Sher, Andrei
Holdaway, Richard N.
Willerslev, Eske
author_sort Thomsen, Philip Francis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major challenge for ancient DNA (aDNA) studies on insect remains is that sampling procedures involve at least partial destruction of the specimens. A recent extraction protocol reveals the possibility of obtaining DNA from past insect remains without causing visual morphological damage. We test the applicability of this protocol on historic museum beetle specimens dating back to AD 1820 and on ancient beetle chitin remains from permafrost (permanently frozen soil) dating back more than 47,000 years. Finally, we test the possibility of obtaining ancient insect DNA directly from non-frozen sediments deposited 3280-1800 years ago - an alternative approach that also does not involve destruction of valuable material. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The success of the methodological approaches are tested by PCR and sequencing of COI and 16S mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments of 77–204 base pairs (-bp) in size using species-specific and general insect primers. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The applied non-destructive DNA extraction method shows promising potential on insect museum specimens of historical age as far back as AD 1820, but less so on the ancient permafrost-preserved insect fossil remains tested, where DNA was obtained from samples up to ca. 26,000 years old. The non-frozen sediment DNA approach appears to have great potential for recording the former presence of insect taxa not normally preserved as macrofossils and opens new frontiers in research on ancient biodiversity.
format Text
id pubmed-2660418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26604182009-04-01 Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA Thomsen, Philip Francis Elias, Scott Gilbert, M. Thomas P. Haile, James Munch, Kasper Kuzmina, Svetlana Froese, Duane G. Sher, Andrei Holdaway, Richard N. Willerslev, Eske PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A major challenge for ancient DNA (aDNA) studies on insect remains is that sampling procedures involve at least partial destruction of the specimens. A recent extraction protocol reveals the possibility of obtaining DNA from past insect remains without causing visual morphological damage. We test the applicability of this protocol on historic museum beetle specimens dating back to AD 1820 and on ancient beetle chitin remains from permafrost (permanently frozen soil) dating back more than 47,000 years. Finally, we test the possibility of obtaining ancient insect DNA directly from non-frozen sediments deposited 3280-1800 years ago - an alternative approach that also does not involve destruction of valuable material. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The success of the methodological approaches are tested by PCR and sequencing of COI and 16S mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments of 77–204 base pairs (-bp) in size using species-specific and general insect primers. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The applied non-destructive DNA extraction method shows promising potential on insect museum specimens of historical age as far back as AD 1820, but less so on the ancient permafrost-preserved insect fossil remains tested, where DNA was obtained from samples up to ca. 26,000 years old. The non-frozen sediment DNA approach appears to have great potential for recording the former presence of insect taxa not normally preserved as macrofossils and opens new frontiers in research on ancient biodiversity. Public Library of Science 2009-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2660418/ /pubmed/19337382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005048 Text en Thomsen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomsen, Philip Francis
Elias, Scott
Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
Haile, James
Munch, Kasper
Kuzmina, Svetlana
Froese, Duane G.
Sher, Andrei
Holdaway, Richard N.
Willerslev, Eske
Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title_full Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title_fullStr Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title_full_unstemmed Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title_short Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA
title_sort non-destructive sampling of ancient insect dna
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19337382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005048
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsenphilipfrancis nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT eliasscott nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT gilbertmthomasp nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT hailejames nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT munchkasper nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT kuzminasvetlana nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT froeseduaneg nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT sherandrei nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT holdawayrichardn nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna
AT willersleveske nondestructivesamplingofancientinsectdna