Cargando…

Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simmons, Rebecca K., Coleman, Ruth L., Price, Hermione C., Holman, Rury R., Khaw, Kay-Tee, Wareham, Nicholas J., Griffin, Simon J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918
_version_ 1782165734877560832
author Simmons, Rebecca K.
Coleman, Ruth L.
Price, Hermione C.
Holman, Rury R.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Griffin, Simon J.
author_facet Simmons, Rebecca K.
Coleman, Ruth L.
Price, Hermione C.
Holman, Rury R.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Griffin, Simon J.
author_sort Simmons, Rebecca K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individuals with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, defined as A1C ≥6.0%; and 3) individuals with normoglycemia defined as A1C <6.0%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk). Participants aged 40–79 years recruited from U.K. general practices attended a health examination (1993–1998) and were followed for CVD events/death until April 2007. CVD risk estimates were calculated for 10,137 individuals. RESULTS: Over 10.1 years, there were 69 CVD events in the diabetes group (25.4%), 160 in the hyperglycemia group (17.7%), and 732 in the normoglycemia group (8.2%). Estimated CVD 10-year risk in the diabetes group was 33 and 37% using the UKPDS and Framingham equations, respectively. In the hyperglycemia group, estimated CVD risks were 31 and 22%, respectively, and for the normoglycemia group risks were 20 and 14%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ability of the risk equations to discriminate between individuals at different risk of CVD events in each subgroup; both equations overestimated CVD risk. The Framingham equations performed better in the hyperglycemia and normoglycemia groups as they did not overestimate risk as much as the UKPDS Risk Engine, and they classified more participants correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Both the UKPDS Risk Engine and Framingham risk equations were moderately effective at ranking individuals and are therefore suitable for resource prioritization. However, both overestimated true risk, which is important when one is using scores to communicate prognostic information to individuals.
format Text
id pubmed-2660447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26604472010-04-01 Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort Simmons, Rebecca K. Coleman, Ruth L. Price, Hermione C. Holman, Rury R. Khaw, Kay-Tee Wareham, Nicholas J. Griffin, Simon J. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individuals with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, defined as A1C ≥6.0%; and 3) individuals with normoglycemia defined as A1C <6.0%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk). Participants aged 40–79 years recruited from U.K. general practices attended a health examination (1993–1998) and were followed for CVD events/death until April 2007. CVD risk estimates were calculated for 10,137 individuals. RESULTS: Over 10.1 years, there were 69 CVD events in the diabetes group (25.4%), 160 in the hyperglycemia group (17.7%), and 732 in the normoglycemia group (8.2%). Estimated CVD 10-year risk in the diabetes group was 33 and 37% using the UKPDS and Framingham equations, respectively. In the hyperglycemia group, estimated CVD risks were 31 and 22%, respectively, and for the normoglycemia group risks were 20 and 14%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ability of the risk equations to discriminate between individuals at different risk of CVD events in each subgroup; both equations overestimated CVD risk. The Framingham equations performed better in the hyperglycemia and normoglycemia groups as they did not overestimate risk as much as the UKPDS Risk Engine, and they classified more participants correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Both the UKPDS Risk Engine and Framingham risk equations were moderately effective at ranking individuals and are therefore suitable for resource prioritization. However, both overestimated true risk, which is important when one is using scores to communicate prognostic information to individuals. American Diabetes Association 2009-04 2008-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2660447/ /pubmed/19114615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918 Text en © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Simmons, Rebecca K.
Coleman, Ruth L.
Price, Hermione C.
Holman, Rury R.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Griffin, Simon J.
Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title_full Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title_fullStr Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title_short Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
title_sort performance of the uk prospective diabetes study risk engine and the framingham risk equations in estimating cardiovascular disease in the epic- norfolk cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918
work_keys_str_mv AT simmonsrebeccak performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT colemanruthl performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT pricehermionec performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT holmanruryr performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT khawkaytee performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT warehamnicholasj performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT griffinsimonj performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort