Cargando…
Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918 |
_version_ | 1782165734877560832 |
---|---|
author | Simmons, Rebecca K. Coleman, Ruth L. Price, Hermione C. Holman, Rury R. Khaw, Kay-Tee Wareham, Nicholas J. Griffin, Simon J. |
author_facet | Simmons, Rebecca K. Coleman, Ruth L. Price, Hermione C. Holman, Rury R. Khaw, Kay-Tee Wareham, Nicholas J. Griffin, Simon J. |
author_sort | Simmons, Rebecca K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individuals with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, defined as A1C ≥6.0%; and 3) individuals with normoglycemia defined as A1C <6.0%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk). Participants aged 40–79 years recruited from U.K. general practices attended a health examination (1993–1998) and were followed for CVD events/death until April 2007. CVD risk estimates were calculated for 10,137 individuals. RESULTS: Over 10.1 years, there were 69 CVD events in the diabetes group (25.4%), 160 in the hyperglycemia group (17.7%), and 732 in the normoglycemia group (8.2%). Estimated CVD 10-year risk in the diabetes group was 33 and 37% using the UKPDS and Framingham equations, respectively. In the hyperglycemia group, estimated CVD risks were 31 and 22%, respectively, and for the normoglycemia group risks were 20 and 14%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ability of the risk equations to discriminate between individuals at different risk of CVD events in each subgroup; both equations overestimated CVD risk. The Framingham equations performed better in the hyperglycemia and normoglycemia groups as they did not overestimate risk as much as the UKPDS Risk Engine, and they classified more participants correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Both the UKPDS Risk Engine and Framingham risk equations were moderately effective at ranking individuals and are therefore suitable for resource prioritization. However, both overestimated true risk, which is important when one is using scores to communicate prognostic information to individuals. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2660447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26604472010-04-01 Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort Simmons, Rebecca K. Coleman, Ruth L. Price, Hermione C. Holman, Rury R. Khaw, Kay-Tee Wareham, Nicholas J. Griffin, Simon J. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (version 3) and the Framingham risk equations (2008) in estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three populations: 1) individuals with known diabetes; 2) individuals with nondiabetic hyperglycemia, defined as A1C ≥6.0%; and 3) individuals with normoglycemia defined as A1C <6.0%. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk). Participants aged 40–79 years recruited from U.K. general practices attended a health examination (1993–1998) and were followed for CVD events/death until April 2007. CVD risk estimates were calculated for 10,137 individuals. RESULTS: Over 10.1 years, there were 69 CVD events in the diabetes group (25.4%), 160 in the hyperglycemia group (17.7%), and 732 in the normoglycemia group (8.2%). Estimated CVD 10-year risk in the diabetes group was 33 and 37% using the UKPDS and Framingham equations, respectively. In the hyperglycemia group, estimated CVD risks were 31 and 22%, respectively, and for the normoglycemia group risks were 20 and 14%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ability of the risk equations to discriminate between individuals at different risk of CVD events in each subgroup; both equations overestimated CVD risk. The Framingham equations performed better in the hyperglycemia and normoglycemia groups as they did not overestimate risk as much as the UKPDS Risk Engine, and they classified more participants correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Both the UKPDS Risk Engine and Framingham risk equations were moderately effective at ranking individuals and are therefore suitable for resource prioritization. However, both overestimated true risk, which is important when one is using scores to communicate prognostic information to individuals. American Diabetes Association 2009-04 2008-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2660447/ /pubmed/19114615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918 Text en © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Simmons, Rebecca K. Coleman, Ruth L. Price, Hermione C. Holman, Rury R. Khaw, Kay-Tee Wareham, Nicholas J. Griffin, Simon J. Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title | Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title_full | Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title_fullStr | Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title_short | Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort |
title_sort | performance of the uk prospective diabetes study risk engine and the framingham risk equations in estimating cardiovascular disease in the epic- norfolk cohort |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simmonsrebeccak performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT colemanruthl performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT pricehermionec performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT holmanruryr performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT khawkaytee performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT warehamnicholasj performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort AT griffinsimonj performanceoftheukprospectivediabetesstudyriskengineandtheframinghamriskequationsinestimatingcardiovasculardiseaseintheepicnorfolkcohort |