Cargando…
Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that bezafibrate, an approved fibrate, can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from routine medical practice in the U.K., as captured by the General Practice Re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19131462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1809 |
_version_ | 1782165743399337984 |
---|---|
author | Flory, James H. Ellenberg, Susan Szapary, Philippe O. Strom, Brian L. Hennessy, Sean |
author_facet | Flory, James H. Ellenberg, Susan Szapary, Philippe O. Strom, Brian L. Hennessy, Sean |
author_sort | Flory, James H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that bezafibrate, an approved fibrate, can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from routine medical practice in the U.K., as captured by the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Individuals chronically exposed to bezafibrate were compared with individuals chronically exposed to other fibrates. Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident type 2 diabetes were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. A post hoc analysis was used to examine the effect of bezafibrate on progression to use of oral antidiabetic medications or insulin in individuals with diabetes at baseline. RESULTS: Bezafibrate users had a lower hazard for incident diabetes than users of other fibrates (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.53–0.81]). This effect became stronger with increasing duration of therapy. Post hoc analysis of the effect of bezafibrate on progression of preexisting diabetes also showed a lower hazard for progression to use of antidiabetic medication (0.54 [0.38–0.76]) or progression to use of insulin (0.78 [0.55–1.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Bezafibrate appears to have clinically important antidiabetic properties. Randomized controlled trials should be considered to assess the utility of bezafibrate in treating patients with diabetes or in preventing diabetes in high-risk patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2660490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26604902010-04-01 Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database Flory, James H. Ellenberg, Susan Szapary, Philippe O. Strom, Brian L. Hennessy, Sean Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that bezafibrate, an approved fibrate, can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from routine medical practice in the U.K., as captured by the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Individuals chronically exposed to bezafibrate were compared with individuals chronically exposed to other fibrates. Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident type 2 diabetes were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. A post hoc analysis was used to examine the effect of bezafibrate on progression to use of oral antidiabetic medications or insulin in individuals with diabetes at baseline. RESULTS: Bezafibrate users had a lower hazard for incident diabetes than users of other fibrates (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.53–0.81]). This effect became stronger with increasing duration of therapy. Post hoc analysis of the effect of bezafibrate on progression of preexisting diabetes also showed a lower hazard for progression to use of antidiabetic medication (0.54 [0.38–0.76]) or progression to use of insulin (0.78 [0.55–1.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Bezafibrate appears to have clinically important antidiabetic properties. Randomized controlled trials should be considered to assess the utility of bezafibrate in treating patients with diabetes or in preventing diabetes in high-risk patients. American Diabetes Association 2009-04 2009-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2660490/ /pubmed/19131462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1809 Text en © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Flory, James H. Ellenberg, Susan Szapary, Philippe O. Strom, Brian L. Hennessy, Sean Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title | Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title_full | Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title_fullStr | Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title_full_unstemmed | Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title_short | Antidiabetic Action of Bezafibrate in a Large Observational Database |
title_sort | antidiabetic action of bezafibrate in a large observational database |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19131462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT floryjamesh antidiabeticactionofbezafibrateinalargeobservationaldatabase AT ellenbergsusan antidiabeticactionofbezafibrateinalargeobservationaldatabase AT szaparyphilippeo antidiabeticactionofbezafibrateinalargeobservationaldatabase AT strombrianl antidiabeticactionofbezafibrateinalargeobservationaldatabase AT hennessysean antidiabeticactionofbezafibrateinalargeobservationaldatabase |