Cargando…

Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing

BACKGROUND: Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is required to study the routes and rates of transmission of this pathogen. Currently available typing techniques are either resource-intensive or have limited discriminatory ability. Multiple-locus variable number ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schouls, Leo M., Spalburg, Emile C., van Luit, Martijn, Huijsdens, Xander W., Pluister, Gerlinde N., van Santen-Verheuvel, Marga G., van der Heide, Han G. J., Grundmann, Hajo, Heck, Max E. O. C., de Neeling, Albert J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2661140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19343175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005082
_version_ 1782165789559750656
author Schouls, Leo M.
Spalburg, Emile C.
van Luit, Martijn
Huijsdens, Xander W.
Pluister, Gerlinde N.
van Santen-Verheuvel, Marga G.
van der Heide, Han G. J.
Grundmann, Hajo
Heck, Max E. O. C.
de Neeling, Albert J.
author_facet Schouls, Leo M.
Spalburg, Emile C.
van Luit, Martijn
Huijsdens, Xander W.
Pluister, Gerlinde N.
van Santen-Verheuvel, Marga G.
van der Heide, Han G. J.
Grundmann, Hajo
Heck, Max E. O. C.
de Neeling, Albert J.
author_sort Schouls, Leo M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is required to study the routes and rates of transmission of this pathogen. Currently available typing techniques are either resource-intensive or have limited discriminatory ability. Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) may provide an alternative high throughput molecular typing tool with high epidemiological resolution. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A new MLVA scheme for S. aureus was validated using 1681 S. aureus isolates collected from Dutch patients and 100 isolates from pigs. MLVA using 8 tandem repeat loci was performed in 2 multiplex PCRs and the fluorescently labeled PCR products were accurately sized on an automated DNA sequencer. The assessed number of repeats was used to create MLVA profiles consisting of strings of 8 integers that were used for categorical clustering. MLVA yielded 511 types that clustered into 11 distinct MLVA complexes which appeared to coincide with MLST clonal complexes. MLVA was at least as discriminatory as PFGE and twice as discriminatory as spa-sequence typing. There was considerable congruence between MLVA, spa-sequence typing and PFGE, at the MLVA complex level with group separation values of 95.1% and 89.2%. MLVA could not discriminate between pig-related MRSA strains isolated from humans and pigs, corroborating the high degree of relationship. MLVA was also superior in the grouping of MRSA isolates previously assigned to temporal-spatial clusters with indistinguishable SpaTypes, demonstrating its enhanced epidemiological usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: The MLVA described in this study is a high throughput, relatively low cost genotyping method for S. aureus that yields discrete and unambiguous data that can be used to assign biological meaningful genotypes and complexes and can be used for interlaboratory comparisons in network accessible databases. Results suggest that MLVA offsets the disadvantages of other high discriminatory typing approaches and represents a promising tool for hospital, national and international molecular epidemiology.
format Text
id pubmed-2661140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26611402009-04-03 Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing Schouls, Leo M. Spalburg, Emile C. van Luit, Martijn Huijsdens, Xander W. Pluister, Gerlinde N. van Santen-Verheuvel, Marga G. van der Heide, Han G. J. Grundmann, Hajo Heck, Max E. O. C. de Neeling, Albert J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is required to study the routes and rates of transmission of this pathogen. Currently available typing techniques are either resource-intensive or have limited discriminatory ability. Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) may provide an alternative high throughput molecular typing tool with high epidemiological resolution. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A new MLVA scheme for S. aureus was validated using 1681 S. aureus isolates collected from Dutch patients and 100 isolates from pigs. MLVA using 8 tandem repeat loci was performed in 2 multiplex PCRs and the fluorescently labeled PCR products were accurately sized on an automated DNA sequencer. The assessed number of repeats was used to create MLVA profiles consisting of strings of 8 integers that were used for categorical clustering. MLVA yielded 511 types that clustered into 11 distinct MLVA complexes which appeared to coincide with MLST clonal complexes. MLVA was at least as discriminatory as PFGE and twice as discriminatory as spa-sequence typing. There was considerable congruence between MLVA, spa-sequence typing and PFGE, at the MLVA complex level with group separation values of 95.1% and 89.2%. MLVA could not discriminate between pig-related MRSA strains isolated from humans and pigs, corroborating the high degree of relationship. MLVA was also superior in the grouping of MRSA isolates previously assigned to temporal-spatial clusters with indistinguishable SpaTypes, demonstrating its enhanced epidemiological usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: The MLVA described in this study is a high throughput, relatively low cost genotyping method for S. aureus that yields discrete and unambiguous data that can be used to assign biological meaningful genotypes and complexes and can be used for interlaboratory comparisons in network accessible databases. Results suggest that MLVA offsets the disadvantages of other high discriminatory typing approaches and represents a promising tool for hospital, national and international molecular epidemiology. Public Library of Science 2009-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2661140/ /pubmed/19343175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005082 Text en Schouls et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schouls, Leo M.
Spalburg, Emile C.
van Luit, Martijn
Huijsdens, Xander W.
Pluister, Gerlinde N.
van Santen-Verheuvel, Marga G.
van der Heide, Han G. J.
Grundmann, Hajo
Heck, Max E. O. C.
de Neeling, Albert J.
Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title_full Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title_fullStr Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title_short Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus: Comparison with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and spa-Typing
title_sort multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis of staphylococcus aureus: comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa-typing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2661140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19343175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005082
work_keys_str_mv AT schoulsleom multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT spalburgemilec multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT vanluitmartijn multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT huijsdensxanderw multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT pluistergerlinden multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT vansantenverheuvelmargag multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT vanderheidehangj multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT grundmannhajo multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT heckmaxeoc multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping
AT deneelingalbertj multiplelocusvariablenumbertandemrepeatanalysisofstaphylococcusaureuscomparisonwithpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandspatyping