Cargando…
Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11 |
_version_ | 1782165880330780672 |
---|---|
author | Biswas, Tithi Okunieff, Paul Schell, Michael C Smudzin, Therese Pilcher, Webster H Bakos, Robert S Vates, G Edward Walter, Kevin A Wensel, Andrew Korones, David N Milano, Michael T |
author_facet | Biswas, Tithi Okunieff, Paul Schell, Michael C Smudzin, Therese Pilcher, Webster H Bakos, Robert S Vates, G Edward Walter, Kevin A Wensel, Andrew Korones, David N Milano, Michael T |
author_sort | Biswas, Tithi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosurgery system. Eighteen patients (54%) underwent salvage SRS for recurrence while 15 (45%) patients received upfront SRS following standard fractionated RT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RESULTS: There were no RTOG grade >2 acute side effects. The median survival after SRS was 6.7 months (range 1.4 – 74.7). There was no significant difference in overall survival (from the time of initial diagnosis) with respect to the timing of SRS (p = 0.2). There was significantly better progression free survival in patients treated with SRS as consolidation versus at the time of recurrence (p = 0.04). The majority of patients failed within or at the margin of the SRS treatment volume (21/26 evaluable for recurrence). CONCLUSION: SRS is well tolerated in the treatment of glioblastoma. As there was no difference in survival whether SRS is delivered upfront or at recurrence, the treatment for each patient should be individualized. Future studies are needed to identify patients most likely to respond to SRS. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2662864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26628642009-03-31 Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis Biswas, Tithi Okunieff, Paul Schell, Michael C Smudzin, Therese Pilcher, Webster H Bakos, Robert S Vates, G Edward Walter, Kevin A Wensel, Andrew Korones, David N Milano, Michael T Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosurgery system. Eighteen patients (54%) underwent salvage SRS for recurrence while 15 (45%) patients received upfront SRS following standard fractionated RT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RESULTS: There were no RTOG grade >2 acute side effects. The median survival after SRS was 6.7 months (range 1.4 – 74.7). There was no significant difference in overall survival (from the time of initial diagnosis) with respect to the timing of SRS (p = 0.2). There was significantly better progression free survival in patients treated with SRS as consolidation versus at the time of recurrence (p = 0.04). The majority of patients failed within or at the margin of the SRS treatment volume (21/26 evaluable for recurrence). CONCLUSION: SRS is well tolerated in the treatment of glioblastoma. As there was no difference in survival whether SRS is delivered upfront or at recurrence, the treatment for each patient should be individualized. Future studies are needed to identify patients most likely to respond to SRS. BioMed Central 2009-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2662864/ /pubmed/19292912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11 Text en Copyright © 2009 Biswas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Biswas, Tithi Okunieff, Paul Schell, Michael C Smudzin, Therese Pilcher, Webster H Bakos, Robert S Vates, G Edward Walter, Kevin A Wensel, Andrew Korones, David N Milano, Michael T Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title | Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title_full | Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title_short | Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
title_sort | stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biswastithi stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT okunieffpaul stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT schellmichaelc stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT smudzintherese stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT pilcherwebsterh stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT bakosroberts stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT vatesgedward stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT walterkevina stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT wenselandrew stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT koronesdavidn stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis AT milanomichaelt stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis |