Cargando…

Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biswas, Tithi, Okunieff, Paul, Schell, Michael C, Smudzin, Therese, Pilcher, Webster H, Bakos, Robert S, Vates, G Edward, Walter, Kevin A, Wensel, Andrew, Korones, David N, Milano, Michael T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11
_version_ 1782165880330780672
author Biswas, Tithi
Okunieff, Paul
Schell, Michael C
Smudzin, Therese
Pilcher, Webster H
Bakos, Robert S
Vates, G Edward
Walter, Kevin A
Wensel, Andrew
Korones, David N
Milano, Michael T
author_facet Biswas, Tithi
Okunieff, Paul
Schell, Michael C
Smudzin, Therese
Pilcher, Webster H
Bakos, Robert S
Vates, G Edward
Walter, Kevin A
Wensel, Andrew
Korones, David N
Milano, Michael T
author_sort Biswas, Tithi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosurgery system. Eighteen patients (54%) underwent salvage SRS for recurrence while 15 (45%) patients received upfront SRS following standard fractionated RT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RESULTS: There were no RTOG grade >2 acute side effects. The median survival after SRS was 6.7 months (range 1.4 – 74.7). There was no significant difference in overall survival (from the time of initial diagnosis) with respect to the timing of SRS (p = 0.2). There was significantly better progression free survival in patients treated with SRS as consolidation versus at the time of recurrence (p = 0.04). The majority of patients failed within or at the margin of the SRS treatment volume (21/26 evaluable for recurrence). CONCLUSION: SRS is well tolerated in the treatment of glioblastoma. As there was no difference in survival whether SRS is delivered upfront or at recurrence, the treatment for each patient should be individualized. Future studies are needed to identify patients most likely to respond to SRS.
format Text
id pubmed-2662864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26628642009-03-31 Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis Biswas, Tithi Okunieff, Paul Schell, Michael C Smudzin, Therese Pilcher, Webster H Bakos, Robert S Vates, G Edward Walter, Kevin A Wensel, Andrew Korones, David N Milano, Michael T Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to better understand the conditions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma may be efficacious. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 33 patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma received SRS with the Novalis(® )Shaped Beam Radiosurgery system. Eighteen patients (54%) underwent salvage SRS for recurrence while 15 (45%) patients received upfront SRS following standard fractionated RT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RESULTS: There were no RTOG grade >2 acute side effects. The median survival after SRS was 6.7 months (range 1.4 – 74.7). There was no significant difference in overall survival (from the time of initial diagnosis) with respect to the timing of SRS (p = 0.2). There was significantly better progression free survival in patients treated with SRS as consolidation versus at the time of recurrence (p = 0.04). The majority of patients failed within or at the margin of the SRS treatment volume (21/26 evaluable for recurrence). CONCLUSION: SRS is well tolerated in the treatment of glioblastoma. As there was no difference in survival whether SRS is delivered upfront or at recurrence, the treatment for each patient should be individualized. Future studies are needed to identify patients most likely to respond to SRS. BioMed Central 2009-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2662864/ /pubmed/19292912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11 Text en Copyright © 2009 Biswas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Biswas, Tithi
Okunieff, Paul
Schell, Michael C
Smudzin, Therese
Pilcher, Webster H
Bakos, Robert S
Vates, G Edward
Walter, Kevin A
Wensel, Andrew
Korones, David N
Milano, Michael T
Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title_full Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title_short Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
title_sort stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-11
work_keys_str_mv AT biswastithi stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT okunieffpaul stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT schellmichaelc stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT smudzintherese stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pilcherwebsterh stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bakosroberts stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT vatesgedward stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT walterkevina stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wenselandrew stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT koronesdavidn stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT milanomichaelt stereotacticradiosurgeryforglioblastomaretrospectiveanalysis