Cargando…

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is a highly accurate test for evaluating intraperitoneal hemorrhage or a ruptured hollow viscus, but is performed less frequently today due to the increased use of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and helical computed tomography (CT). All three of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehouse, Jill S, Weigelt, John A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19267941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-13
_version_ 1782165902182055936
author Whitehouse, Jill S
Weigelt, John A
author_facet Whitehouse, Jill S
Weigelt, John A
author_sort Whitehouse, Jill S
collection PubMed
description Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is a highly accurate test for evaluating intraperitoneal hemorrhage or a ruptured hollow viscus, but is performed less frequently today due to the increased use of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and helical computed tomography (CT). All three of these exams have advantages and disadvantages and thus each still play unique roles in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Since DPL is performed less frequently today, a review of its indications, technique, and interpretation is pertinent.
format Text
id pubmed-2663535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26635352009-04-01 Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation Whitehouse, Jill S Weigelt, John A Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is a highly accurate test for evaluating intraperitoneal hemorrhage or a ruptured hollow viscus, but is performed less frequently today due to the increased use of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and helical computed tomography (CT). All three of these exams have advantages and disadvantages and thus each still play unique roles in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Since DPL is performed less frequently today, a review of its indications, technique, and interpretation is pertinent. BioMed Central 2009-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2663535/ /pubmed/19267941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-13 Text en Copyright © 2009 Whitehouse and Weigelt; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Whitehouse, Jill S
Weigelt, John A
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title_full Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title_fullStr Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title_short Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
title_sort diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19267941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-13
work_keys_str_mv AT whitehousejills diagnosticperitoneallavageareviewofindicationstechniqueandinterpretation
AT weigeltjohna diagnosticperitoneallavageareviewofindicationstechniqueandinterpretation