Cargando…

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available describing human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distributions in cervical cancer in the United States. Such studies are needed to predict how HPV vaccination and HPV-based screening will influence cervical cancer prevention. METHODS: We used the New Mexico Surve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheeler, Cosette M., Hunt, William C., Joste, Nancy E., Key, Charles R., Quint, Wim G. V., Castle, Philip E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19318628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn510
_version_ 1782165932089540608
author Wheeler, Cosette M.
Hunt, William C.
Joste, Nancy E.
Key, Charles R.
Quint, Wim G. V.
Castle, Philip E.
author_facet Wheeler, Cosette M.
Hunt, William C.
Joste, Nancy E.
Key, Charles R.
Quint, Wim G. V.
Castle, Philip E.
author_sort Wheeler, Cosette M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited data are available describing human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distributions in cervical cancer in the United States. Such studies are needed to predict how HPV vaccination and HPV-based screening will influence cervical cancer prevention. METHODS: We used the New Mexico Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry to ascertain cases of in situ (n = 1213) and invasive (n = 808) cervical cancer diagnosed during 1985–1999 and 1980–1999, respectively, in the state of New Mexico. HPV genotyping was performed using two polymerase chain reaction–based methods on paraffin-embedded tissues from in situ and invasive cancers and on cervical Papanicolaou test specimen from control subjects (ie, women aged 18–40 years attending clinics for routine cervical screening [n = 4007]). Relative risks for cervical cancer were estimated, and factors associated with age at cancer diagnosis and the prevalence of HPV genotypes in cancers were examined. RESULTS: The most common HPV genotypes detected in invasive cancers were HPV type 16 (HPV16, 53.2%), HPV18 (13.1%), and HPV45 (6.1%) and those in in situ cancers were HPV16 (56.3%), HPV31 (12.6%), and HPV33 (8.0%). Invasive cancer case subjects who were positive for HPV16 or 18 were diagnosed at younger ages than those who were positive for other carcinogenic HPV genotypes (mean age at diagnosis: 48.1 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 46.6 to 49.6 years], 45.9 [95% CI = 42.9 to 49.0 years], and 52.3 years [95% CI = 50.0 to 54.6 years], respectively). The proportion of HPV16-positive in situ and invasive cancers, but not of HPV18-positive cancers, declined with more recent calendar year of diagnosis, whereas the proportion positive for carcinogenic HPV genotypes other than HPV18 increased. CONCLUSIONS: HPV16 and 18 caused the majority of invasive cervical cancer in this population sample of US women, but the proportion attributable to HPV16 declined over the last 20 years. The age at diagnosis of HPV16- and HPV18-related cancers was 5 years earlier than that of cancers caused by carcinogenic HPV genotypes other than HPV16 and 18, suggesting that the age at initiation of cervical screening could be delayed in HPV-vaccinated populations.
format Text
id pubmed-2664090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26640902009-04-02 Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States Wheeler, Cosette M. Hunt, William C. Joste, Nancy E. Key, Charles R. Quint, Wim G. V. Castle, Philip E. J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Limited data are available describing human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distributions in cervical cancer in the United States. Such studies are needed to predict how HPV vaccination and HPV-based screening will influence cervical cancer prevention. METHODS: We used the New Mexico Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry to ascertain cases of in situ (n = 1213) and invasive (n = 808) cervical cancer diagnosed during 1985–1999 and 1980–1999, respectively, in the state of New Mexico. HPV genotyping was performed using two polymerase chain reaction–based methods on paraffin-embedded tissues from in situ and invasive cancers and on cervical Papanicolaou test specimen from control subjects (ie, women aged 18–40 years attending clinics for routine cervical screening [n = 4007]). Relative risks for cervical cancer were estimated, and factors associated with age at cancer diagnosis and the prevalence of HPV genotypes in cancers were examined. RESULTS: The most common HPV genotypes detected in invasive cancers were HPV type 16 (HPV16, 53.2%), HPV18 (13.1%), and HPV45 (6.1%) and those in in situ cancers were HPV16 (56.3%), HPV31 (12.6%), and HPV33 (8.0%). Invasive cancer case subjects who were positive for HPV16 or 18 were diagnosed at younger ages than those who were positive for other carcinogenic HPV genotypes (mean age at diagnosis: 48.1 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 46.6 to 49.6 years], 45.9 [95% CI = 42.9 to 49.0 years], and 52.3 years [95% CI = 50.0 to 54.6 years], respectively). The proportion of HPV16-positive in situ and invasive cancers, but not of HPV18-positive cancers, declined with more recent calendar year of diagnosis, whereas the proportion positive for carcinogenic HPV genotypes other than HPV18 increased. CONCLUSIONS: HPV16 and 18 caused the majority of invasive cervical cancer in this population sample of US women, but the proportion attributable to HPV16 declined over the last 20 years. The age at diagnosis of HPV16- and HPV18-related cancers was 5 years earlier than that of cancers caused by carcinogenic HPV genotypes other than HPV16 and 18, suggesting that the age at initiation of cervical screening could be delayed in HPV-vaccinated populations. Oxford University Press 2009-04-01 2009-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2664090/ /pubmed/19318628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn510 Text en © 2009 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Wheeler, Cosette M.
Hunt, William C.
Joste, Nancy E.
Key, Charles R.
Quint, Wim G. V.
Castle, Philip E.
Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title_full Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title_fullStr Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title_short Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distributions: Implications for Vaccination and Cancer Screening in the United States
title_sort human papillomavirus genotype distributions: implications for vaccination and cancer screening in the united states
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19318628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn510
work_keys_str_mv AT wheelercosettem humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT huntwilliamc humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT jostenancye humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT keycharlesr humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT quintwimgv humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT castlephilipe humanpapillomavirusgenotypedistributionsimplicationsforvaccinationandcancerscreeningintheunitedstates