Cargando…

Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines

BACKGROUND: While the active participation of general practitioners (GPs) in integrated health services networks (IHSNs) plays a critical role in their success, little is known about the incentives and barriers to their actual participation. METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Stampa, Matthieu, Vedel, Isabelle, Bergman, Howard, Novella, Jean-Luc, Lapointe, Liette
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-48
_version_ 1782165991818526720
author de Stampa, Matthieu
Vedel, Isabelle
Bergman, Howard
Novella, Jean-Luc
Lapointe, Liette
author_facet de Stampa, Matthieu
Vedel, Isabelle
Bergman, Howard
Novella, Jean-Luc
Lapointe, Liette
author_sort de Stampa, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the active participation of general practitioners (GPs) in integrated health services networks (IHSNs) plays a critical role in their success, little is known about the incentives and barriers to their actual participation. METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and a mail survey with GPs enrolled in SIPA (system of integrated care for older persons) at 2 sites in Montreal. A total of 61 GPs completed the questionnaire, from which 22 were randomly selected for the qualitative study, with active and non-active participation in the IHSN. RESULTS: The key themes associated with GP participation were clinician characteristics, consequences perceived at the outset, the SIPA implementation process, relationships with the SIPA team and professional consequences. The incentive factors reported were collaborative practices, high rates of elderly and SIPA patients in their clienteles, concerns about SIPA, the selection of frail elderly patients, close relationships with the case manager, the perceived efficacy of SIPA, and improved professional practices. Barriers to GP participation included high expectations, GP recruitment, lack of information on SIPA, difficult relationships with SIPA geriatricians and deterioration of physician-patient relationships. Four profiles of participation were identified: 2 groups of participants active in SIPA and 2 groups of participants not active in SIPA. The active GPs were familiar with collaborative practices, had higher IHSN patient rates, expressed more concerns than expectations, reported satisfactory relationships with case managers and perceived the efficacy of SIPA. Both active and non-active GPs reported quality care in the IHSN and improved professional practice. CONCLUSION: Throughout the implementation process, the participation of GPs in an IHSN depends on numerous professional (clinician characteristics) and organizational factors (GP recruitment, relationships with case managers). Our study provides guiding principles for establishing future integrated models of care. It suggests practical guidelines to support the active participation of GPs in these networks such as physicians with collaborative practices, recruitment of significant number of patients per physicians, the information provided and the accompaniment by geriatricians.
format Text
id pubmed-2664801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26648012009-04-03 Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines de Stampa, Matthieu Vedel, Isabelle Bergman, Howard Novella, Jean-Luc Lapointe, Liette BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: While the active participation of general practitioners (GPs) in integrated health services networks (IHSNs) plays a critical role in their success, little is known about the incentives and barriers to their actual participation. METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and a mail survey with GPs enrolled in SIPA (system of integrated care for older persons) at 2 sites in Montreal. A total of 61 GPs completed the questionnaire, from which 22 were randomly selected for the qualitative study, with active and non-active participation in the IHSN. RESULTS: The key themes associated with GP participation were clinician characteristics, consequences perceived at the outset, the SIPA implementation process, relationships with the SIPA team and professional consequences. The incentive factors reported were collaborative practices, high rates of elderly and SIPA patients in their clienteles, concerns about SIPA, the selection of frail elderly patients, close relationships with the case manager, the perceived efficacy of SIPA, and improved professional practices. Barriers to GP participation included high expectations, GP recruitment, lack of information on SIPA, difficult relationships with SIPA geriatricians and deterioration of physician-patient relationships. Four profiles of participation were identified: 2 groups of participants active in SIPA and 2 groups of participants not active in SIPA. The active GPs were familiar with collaborative practices, had higher IHSN patient rates, expressed more concerns than expectations, reported satisfactory relationships with case managers and perceived the efficacy of SIPA. Both active and non-active GPs reported quality care in the IHSN and improved professional practice. CONCLUSION: Throughout the implementation process, the participation of GPs in an IHSN depends on numerous professional (clinician characteristics) and organizational factors (GP recruitment, relationships with case managers). Our study provides guiding principles for establishing future integrated models of care. It suggests practical guidelines to support the active participation of GPs in these networks such as physicians with collaborative practices, recruitment of significant number of patients per physicians, the information provided and the accompaniment by geriatricians. BioMed Central 2009-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2664801/ /pubmed/19292905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-48 Text en Copyright © 2009 de Stampa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Stampa, Matthieu
Vedel, Isabelle
Bergman, Howard
Novella, Jean-Luc
Lapointe, Liette
Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title_full Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title_fullStr Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title_short Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
title_sort fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19292905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-48
work_keys_str_mv AT destampamatthieu fosteringparticipationofgeneralpractitionersinintegratedhealthservicesnetworksincentivesbarriersandguidelines
AT vedelisabelle fosteringparticipationofgeneralpractitionersinintegratedhealthservicesnetworksincentivesbarriersandguidelines
AT bergmanhoward fosteringparticipationofgeneralpractitionersinintegratedhealthservicesnetworksincentivesbarriersandguidelines
AT novellajeanluc fosteringparticipationofgeneralpractitionersinintegratedhealthservicesnetworksincentivesbarriersandguidelines
AT lapointeliette fosteringparticipationofgeneralpractitionersinintegratedhealthservicesnetworksincentivesbarriersandguidelines