Cargando…
Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews
Objective To investigate basic assumptions and other methodological problems in the application of indirect comparison in systematic reviews of competing healthcare interventions. Design Survey of published systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria Systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2007 in...
Autores principales: | Song, Fujian, Loke, Yoon K, Walsh, Tanya, Glenny, Anne-Marie, Eastwood, Alison J, Altman, Douglas G |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19346285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1147 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study
por: Song, Fujian, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Overall similarity and consistency assessment scores are not sufficiently accurate for predicting discrepancy between direct and indirect comparison estimates
por: Xiong, Tengbin, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Why Are Medical and Health-Related Studies Not Being Published? A Systematic Review of Reasons Given by Investigators
por: Song, Fujian, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting
por: Hua, Fang, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges
por: Corbett, Mark S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)