Cargando…

Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings

Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newton, Opiyo, English, Mike
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012
_version_ 1782166031323627520
author Newton, Opiyo
English, Mike
author_facet Newton, Opiyo
English, Mike
author_sort Newton, Opiyo
collection PubMed
description Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches of MEDLINE via PubMed. Two reviewers independently evaluated retrieved studies for inclusion. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) levels of evidence, whilst the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was used for subsequent recommendations. Based on available evidence, where there is meconium-stained liquor, routine perineal suction of all babies and endotracheal suction of active babies do not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome and have potential risks. Adequate ventilation is possible with a bag-valve-mask device and room air is just as efficient as oxygen for initial resuscitation. This review supports the view that effective resuscitation is possible with basic equipment and minimal skills. Thus, where resources are limited, it should be possible to improve neonatal outcomes through promotion of the effective use of a bag-valve-mask alone, without access to more sophisticated and expensive technologies. Basic, effective resuscitation should therefore be available at all health facilities and potentially in the community.
format Text
id pubmed-2665701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26657012009-04-06 Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings Newton, Opiyo English, Mike Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Review Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches of MEDLINE via PubMed. Two reviewers independently evaluated retrieved studies for inclusion. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) levels of evidence, whilst the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was used for subsequent recommendations. Based on available evidence, where there is meconium-stained liquor, routine perineal suction of all babies and endotracheal suction of active babies do not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome and have potential risks. Adequate ventilation is possible with a bag-valve-mask device and room air is just as efficient as oxygen for initial resuscitation. This review supports the view that effective resuscitation is possible with basic equipment and minimal skills. Thus, where resources are limited, it should be possible to improve neonatal outcomes through promotion of the effective use of a bag-valve-mask alone, without access to more sophisticated and expensive technologies. Basic, effective resuscitation should therefore be available at all health facilities and potentially in the community. Oxford University Press 2006-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2665701/ /pubmed/16757009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012 Text en © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Review
Newton, Opiyo
English, Mike
Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title_full Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title_fullStr Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title_full_unstemmed Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title_short Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
title_sort newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012
work_keys_str_mv AT newtonopiyo newbornresuscitationdefiningbestpracticeforlowincomesettings
AT englishmike newbornresuscitationdefiningbestpracticeforlowincomesettings