Cargando…
Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings
Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012 |
_version_ | 1782166031323627520 |
---|---|
author | Newton, Opiyo English, Mike |
author_facet | Newton, Opiyo English, Mike |
author_sort | Newton, Opiyo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches of MEDLINE via PubMed. Two reviewers independently evaluated retrieved studies for inclusion. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) levels of evidence, whilst the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was used for subsequent recommendations. Based on available evidence, where there is meconium-stained liquor, routine perineal suction of all babies and endotracheal suction of active babies do not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome and have potential risks. Adequate ventilation is possible with a bag-valve-mask device and room air is just as efficient as oxygen for initial resuscitation. This review supports the view that effective resuscitation is possible with basic equipment and minimal skills. Thus, where resources are limited, it should be possible to improve neonatal outcomes through promotion of the effective use of a bag-valve-mask alone, without access to more sophisticated and expensive technologies. Basic, effective resuscitation should therefore be available at all health facilities and potentially in the community. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2665701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26657012009-04-06 Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings Newton, Opiyo English, Mike Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Review Current resuscitation practices are often poor in low-income settings. The purpose of this review was to summarise recent evidence, relevant to developing countries, on best practice in the provision of newborn resuscitation. Potential studies for inclusion were identified using structured searches of MEDLINE via PubMed. Two reviewers independently evaluated retrieved studies for inclusion. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) levels of evidence, whilst the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was used for subsequent recommendations. Based on available evidence, where there is meconium-stained liquor, routine perineal suction of all babies and endotracheal suction of active babies do not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome and have potential risks. Adequate ventilation is possible with a bag-valve-mask device and room air is just as efficient as oxygen for initial resuscitation. This review supports the view that effective resuscitation is possible with basic equipment and minimal skills. Thus, where resources are limited, it should be possible to improve neonatal outcomes through promotion of the effective use of a bag-valve-mask alone, without access to more sophisticated and expensive technologies. Basic, effective resuscitation should therefore be available at all health facilities and potentially in the community. Oxford University Press 2006-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2665701/ /pubmed/16757009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012 Text en © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Review Newton, Opiyo English, Mike Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title | Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title_full | Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title_fullStr | Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title_short | Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
title_sort | newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settings |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2665701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newtonopiyo newbornresuscitationdefiningbestpracticeforlowincomesettings AT englishmike newbornresuscitationdefiningbestpracticeforlowincomesettings |