Cargando…
Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Me...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9 |
_version_ | 1782166115980410880 |
---|---|
author | Baba, Kazuyoshi John, Mike T Inukai, Mika Aridome, Kumiko Igarahsi, Yoshimasa |
author_facet | Baba, Kazuyoshi John, Mike T Inukai, Mika Aridome, Kumiko Igarahsi, Yoshimasa |
author_sort | Baba, Kazuyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (N = 491, 71% women, mean age (± SD): 63.0 ± 11.5 years). The questionnaire asked each subject to rate his or her ability to chew 20 common Japanese foods. For each individual, responses were combined to yield a chewing function summary score, with higher scores indicating better self-reported chewing ability. We used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the scores' dimensionality. For validity assessment, we computed the correlations between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured by the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) Internal consistency of scores and test-retest reliability were investigated by asking a subset of subjects (N = 62) to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis provided some evidence that self-reported chewing ability can be characterized by a summary score as the original authors suggest. Support for the validity of chewing function scores using the alternate version of the questionnaire was derived from correlations with OHIP-14 scores (r = -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to -0.39); thus, better chewing ability was associated with less impaired OHRQoL. Internal consistency was 'satisfactory,' with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (lower limit of 95% CI: 0.89). The test-retest reliability was 'good,' with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2667387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26673872009-04-10 Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients Baba, Kazuyoshi John, Mike T Inukai, Mika Aridome, Kumiko Igarahsi, Yoshimasa BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (N = 491, 71% women, mean age (± SD): 63.0 ± 11.5 years). The questionnaire asked each subject to rate his or her ability to chew 20 common Japanese foods. For each individual, responses were combined to yield a chewing function summary score, with higher scores indicating better self-reported chewing ability. We used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the scores' dimensionality. For validity assessment, we computed the correlations between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured by the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) Internal consistency of scores and test-retest reliability were investigated by asking a subset of subjects (N = 62) to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis provided some evidence that self-reported chewing ability can be characterized by a summary score as the original authors suggest. Support for the validity of chewing function scores using the alternate version of the questionnaire was derived from correlations with OHIP-14 scores (r = -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to -0.39); thus, better chewing ability was associated with less impaired OHRQoL. Internal consistency was 'satisfactory,' with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (lower limit of 95% CI: 0.89). The test-retest reliability was 'good,' with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients. BioMed Central 2009-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2667387/ /pubmed/19291293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9 Text en Copyright © 2009 Baba et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baba, Kazuyoshi John, Mike T Inukai, Mika Aridome, Kumiko Igarahsi, Yoshimasa Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title | Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title_full | Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title_fullStr | Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title_short | Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
title_sort | validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babakazuyoshi validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients AT johnmiket validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients AT inukaimika validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients AT aridomekumiko validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients AT igarahsiyoshimasa validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients |