Cargando…

Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baba, Kazuyoshi, John, Mike T, Inukai, Mika, Aridome, Kumiko, Igarahsi, Yoshimasa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9
_version_ 1782166115980410880
author Baba, Kazuyoshi
John, Mike T
Inukai, Mika
Aridome, Kumiko
Igarahsi, Yoshimasa
author_facet Baba, Kazuyoshi
John, Mike T
Inukai, Mika
Aridome, Kumiko
Igarahsi, Yoshimasa
author_sort Baba, Kazuyoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (N = 491, 71% women, mean age (± SD): 63.0 ± 11.5 years). The questionnaire asked each subject to rate his or her ability to chew 20 common Japanese foods. For each individual, responses were combined to yield a chewing function summary score, with higher scores indicating better self-reported chewing ability. We used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the scores' dimensionality. For validity assessment, we computed the correlations between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured by the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) Internal consistency of scores and test-retest reliability were investigated by asking a subset of subjects (N = 62) to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis provided some evidence that self-reported chewing ability can be characterized by a summary score as the original authors suggest. Support for the validity of chewing function scores using the alternate version of the questionnaire was derived from correlations with OHIP-14 scores (r = -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to -0.39); thus, better chewing ability was associated with less impaired OHRQoL. Internal consistency was 'satisfactory,' with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (lower limit of 95% CI: 0.89). The test-retest reliability was 'good,' with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2667387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26673872009-04-10 Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients Baba, Kazuyoshi John, Mike T Inukai, Mika Aridome, Kumiko Igarahsi, Yoshimasa BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (N = 491, 71% women, mean age (± SD): 63.0 ± 11.5 years). The questionnaire asked each subject to rate his or her ability to chew 20 common Japanese foods. For each individual, responses were combined to yield a chewing function summary score, with higher scores indicating better self-reported chewing ability. We used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the scores' dimensionality. For validity assessment, we computed the correlations between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured by the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) Internal consistency of scores and test-retest reliability were investigated by asking a subset of subjects (N = 62) to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis provided some evidence that self-reported chewing ability can be characterized by a summary score as the original authors suggest. Support for the validity of chewing function scores using the alternate version of the questionnaire was derived from correlations with OHIP-14 scores (r = -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to -0.39); thus, better chewing ability was associated with less impaired OHRQoL. Internal consistency was 'satisfactory,' with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (lower limit of 95% CI: 0.89). The test-retest reliability was 'good,' with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients. BioMed Central 2009-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2667387/ /pubmed/19291293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9 Text en Copyright © 2009 Baba et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baba, Kazuyoshi
John, Mike T
Inukai, Mika
Aridome, Kumiko
Igarahsi, Yoshimasa
Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title_full Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title_fullStr Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title_full_unstemmed Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title_short Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
title_sort validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-9
work_keys_str_mv AT babakazuyoshi validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients
AT johnmiket validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients
AT inukaimika validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients
AT aridomekumiko validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients
AT igarahsiyoshimasa validatinganalternateversionofthechewingfunctionquestionnaireinpartiallydentatepatients