Cargando…

Evidence in the learning organization

BACKGROUND: Organizational leaders in business and medicine have been experiencing a similar dilemma: how to ensure that their organizational members are adopting work innovations in a timely fashion. Organizational leaders in healthcare have attempted to resolve this dilemma by offering specific so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crites, Gerald E, McNamara, Megan C, Akl, Elie A, Richardson, W Scott, Umscheid, Craig A, Nishikawa, James
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19323819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-4
_version_ 1782166122111434752
author Crites, Gerald E
McNamara, Megan C
Akl, Elie A
Richardson, W Scott
Umscheid, Craig A
Nishikawa, James
author_facet Crites, Gerald E
McNamara, Megan C
Akl, Elie A
Richardson, W Scott
Umscheid, Craig A
Nishikawa, James
author_sort Crites, Gerald E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Organizational leaders in business and medicine have been experiencing a similar dilemma: how to ensure that their organizational members are adopting work innovations in a timely fashion. Organizational leaders in healthcare have attempted to resolve this dilemma by offering specific solutions, such as evidence-based medicine (EBM), but organizations are still not systematically adopting evidence-based practice innovations as rapidly as expected by policy-makers (the knowing-doing gap problem). Some business leaders have adopted a systems-based perspective, called the learning organization (LO), to address a similar dilemma. Three years ago, the Society of General Internal Medicine's Evidence-based Medicine Task Force began an inquiry to integrate the EBM and LO concepts into one model to address the knowing-doing gap problem. METHODS: During the model development process, the authors searched several databases for relevant LO frameworks and their related concepts by using a broad search strategy. To identify the key LO frameworks and consolidate them into one model, the authors used consensus-based decision-making and a narrative thematic synthesis guided by several qualitative criteria. The authors subjected the model to external, independent review and improved upon its design with this feedback. RESULTS: The authors found seven LO frameworks particularly relevant to evidence-based practice innovations in organizations. The authors describe their interpretations of these frameworks for healthcare organizations, the process they used to integrate the LO frameworks with EBM principles, and the resulting Evidence in the Learning Organization (ELO) model. They also provide a health organization scenario to illustrate ELO concepts in application. CONCLUSION: The authors intend, by sharing the LO frameworks and the ELO model, to help organizations identify their capacities to learn and share knowledge about evidence-based practice innovations. The ELO model will need further validation and improvement through its use in organizational settings and applied health services research.
format Text
id pubmed-2667412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26674122009-04-10 Evidence in the learning organization Crites, Gerald E McNamara, Megan C Akl, Elie A Richardson, W Scott Umscheid, Craig A Nishikawa, James Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Organizational leaders in business and medicine have been experiencing a similar dilemma: how to ensure that their organizational members are adopting work innovations in a timely fashion. Organizational leaders in healthcare have attempted to resolve this dilemma by offering specific solutions, such as evidence-based medicine (EBM), but organizations are still not systematically adopting evidence-based practice innovations as rapidly as expected by policy-makers (the knowing-doing gap problem). Some business leaders have adopted a systems-based perspective, called the learning organization (LO), to address a similar dilemma. Three years ago, the Society of General Internal Medicine's Evidence-based Medicine Task Force began an inquiry to integrate the EBM and LO concepts into one model to address the knowing-doing gap problem. METHODS: During the model development process, the authors searched several databases for relevant LO frameworks and their related concepts by using a broad search strategy. To identify the key LO frameworks and consolidate them into one model, the authors used consensus-based decision-making and a narrative thematic synthesis guided by several qualitative criteria. The authors subjected the model to external, independent review and improved upon its design with this feedback. RESULTS: The authors found seven LO frameworks particularly relevant to evidence-based practice innovations in organizations. The authors describe their interpretations of these frameworks for healthcare organizations, the process they used to integrate the LO frameworks with EBM principles, and the resulting Evidence in the Learning Organization (ELO) model. They also provide a health organization scenario to illustrate ELO concepts in application. CONCLUSION: The authors intend, by sharing the LO frameworks and the ELO model, to help organizations identify their capacities to learn and share knowledge about evidence-based practice innovations. The ELO model will need further validation and improvement through its use in organizational settings and applied health services research. BioMed Central 2009-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2667412/ /pubmed/19323819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-4 Text en Copyright © 2009 Crites et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Crites, Gerald E
McNamara, Megan C
Akl, Elie A
Richardson, W Scott
Umscheid, Craig A
Nishikawa, James
Evidence in the learning organization
title Evidence in the learning organization
title_full Evidence in the learning organization
title_fullStr Evidence in the learning organization
title_full_unstemmed Evidence in the learning organization
title_short Evidence in the learning organization
title_sort evidence in the learning organization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19323819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-4
work_keys_str_mv AT critesgeralde evidenceinthelearningorganization
AT mcnamarameganc evidenceinthelearningorganization
AT akleliea evidenceinthelearningorganization
AT richardsonwscott evidenceinthelearningorganization
AT umscheidcraiga evidenceinthelearningorganization
AT nishikawajames evidenceinthelearningorganization