Cargando…

Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?

BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberfroid, Dominique, Leonard, Christian, Stordeur, Sabine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10
_version_ 1782166380990169088
author Roberfroid, Dominique
Leonard, Christian
Stordeur, Sabine
author_facet Roberfroid, Dominique
Leonard, Christian
Stordeur, Sabine
author_sort Roberfroid, Dominique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore this paper had two objectives: to present a typology of existing forecasting approaches and to analyse the methodology-related issues. METHODS: A literature review was carried out in electronic databases Medline-Ovid, Embase and ERIC. Concrete examples of planning experiences in various countries were analysed. RESULTS: Four main forecasting approaches were identified. The supply projection approach defines the necessary inflow to maintain or to reach in the future an arbitrary predefined level of service offer. The demand-based approach estimates the quantity of health care services used by the population in the future to project physician requirements. The needs-based approach involves defining and predicting health care deficits so that they can be addressed by an adequate workforce. Benchmarking health systems with similar populations and health profiles is the last approach. These different methods can be combined to perform a gap analysis. The methodological challenges of such projections are numerous: most often static models are used and their uncertainty is not assessed; valid and comprehensive data to feed into the models are often lacking; and a rapidly evolving environment affects the likelihood of projection scenarios. As a result, the internal and external validity of the projections included in our review appeared limited. CONCLUSION: There is no single accepted approach to forecasting physician requirements. The value of projections lies in their utility in identifying the current and emerging trends to which policy-makers need to respond. A genuine gap analysis, an effective monitoring of key parameters and comprehensive workforce planning are key elements to improving the usefulness of physician supply projections.
format Text
id pubmed-2671486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26714862009-04-22 Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? Roberfroid, Dominique Leonard, Christian Stordeur, Sabine Hum Resour Health Review BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore this paper had two objectives: to present a typology of existing forecasting approaches and to analyse the methodology-related issues. METHODS: A literature review was carried out in electronic databases Medline-Ovid, Embase and ERIC. Concrete examples of planning experiences in various countries were analysed. RESULTS: Four main forecasting approaches were identified. The supply projection approach defines the necessary inflow to maintain or to reach in the future an arbitrary predefined level of service offer. The demand-based approach estimates the quantity of health care services used by the population in the future to project physician requirements. The needs-based approach involves defining and predicting health care deficits so that they can be addressed by an adequate workforce. Benchmarking health systems with similar populations and health profiles is the last approach. These different methods can be combined to perform a gap analysis. The methodological challenges of such projections are numerous: most often static models are used and their uncertainty is not assessed; valid and comprehensive data to feed into the models are often lacking; and a rapidly evolving environment affects the likelihood of projection scenarios. As a result, the internal and external validity of the projections included in our review appeared limited. CONCLUSION: There is no single accepted approach to forecasting physician requirements. The value of projections lies in their utility in identifying the current and emerging trends to which policy-makers need to respond. A genuine gap analysis, an effective monitoring of key parameters and comprehensive workforce planning are key elements to improving the usefulness of physician supply projections. BioMed Central 2009-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2671486/ /pubmed/19216772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10 Text en Copyright © 2009 Roberfroid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Roberfroid, Dominique
Leonard, Christian
Stordeur, Sabine
Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title_full Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title_fullStr Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title_full_unstemmed Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title_short Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
title_sort physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10
work_keys_str_mv AT roberfroiddominique physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball
AT leonardchristian physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball
AT stordeursabine physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball