Cargando…
Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?
BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10 |
_version_ | 1782166380990169088 |
---|---|
author | Roberfroid, Dominique Leonard, Christian Stordeur, Sabine |
author_facet | Roberfroid, Dominique Leonard, Christian Stordeur, Sabine |
author_sort | Roberfroid, Dominique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore this paper had two objectives: to present a typology of existing forecasting approaches and to analyse the methodology-related issues. METHODS: A literature review was carried out in electronic databases Medline-Ovid, Embase and ERIC. Concrete examples of planning experiences in various countries were analysed. RESULTS: Four main forecasting approaches were identified. The supply projection approach defines the necessary inflow to maintain or to reach in the future an arbitrary predefined level of service offer. The demand-based approach estimates the quantity of health care services used by the population in the future to project physician requirements. The needs-based approach involves defining and predicting health care deficits so that they can be addressed by an adequate workforce. Benchmarking health systems with similar populations and health profiles is the last approach. These different methods can be combined to perform a gap analysis. The methodological challenges of such projections are numerous: most often static models are used and their uncertainty is not assessed; valid and comprehensive data to feed into the models are often lacking; and a rapidly evolving environment affects the likelihood of projection scenarios. As a result, the internal and external validity of the projections included in our review appeared limited. CONCLUSION: There is no single accepted approach to forecasting physician requirements. The value of projections lies in their utility in identifying the current and emerging trends to which policy-makers need to respond. A genuine gap analysis, an effective monitoring of key parameters and comprehensive workforce planning are key elements to improving the usefulness of physician supply projections. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2671486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26714862009-04-22 Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? Roberfroid, Dominique Leonard, Christian Stordeur, Sabine Hum Resour Health Review BACKGROUND: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore this paper had two objectives: to present a typology of existing forecasting approaches and to analyse the methodology-related issues. METHODS: A literature review was carried out in electronic databases Medline-Ovid, Embase and ERIC. Concrete examples of planning experiences in various countries were analysed. RESULTS: Four main forecasting approaches were identified. The supply projection approach defines the necessary inflow to maintain or to reach in the future an arbitrary predefined level of service offer. The demand-based approach estimates the quantity of health care services used by the population in the future to project physician requirements. The needs-based approach involves defining and predicting health care deficits so that they can be addressed by an adequate workforce. Benchmarking health systems with similar populations and health profiles is the last approach. These different methods can be combined to perform a gap analysis. The methodological challenges of such projections are numerous: most often static models are used and their uncertainty is not assessed; valid and comprehensive data to feed into the models are often lacking; and a rapidly evolving environment affects the likelihood of projection scenarios. As a result, the internal and external validity of the projections included in our review appeared limited. CONCLUSION: There is no single accepted approach to forecasting physician requirements. The value of projections lies in their utility in identifying the current and emerging trends to which policy-makers need to respond. A genuine gap analysis, an effective monitoring of key parameters and comprehensive workforce planning are key elements to improving the usefulness of physician supply projections. BioMed Central 2009-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2671486/ /pubmed/19216772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10 Text en Copyright © 2009 Roberfroid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Roberfroid, Dominique Leonard, Christian Stordeur, Sabine Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title | Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title_full | Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title_fullStr | Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title_full_unstemmed | Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title_short | Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
title_sort | physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roberfroiddominique physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball AT leonardchristian physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball AT stordeursabine physiciansupplyforecastbetterthanpeeringinacrystalball |