Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Because treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after failure with first-line chemotherapy remains controversial, we performed this retrospective analysis based on the data obtained from 1455 patients registered in a first-line treatment cohort with respect to receiving or no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Sang Hoon, Lim, Do Hyoung, Yi, Seong Yoon, Kim, Hyo Song, Jun, Hyun Jung, Kim, Kyoung Ha, Chang, Myung Hee, Park, Min Jae, Uhm, Ji Eun, Lee, Jeeyun, Park, Se Hoon, Park, Joon Oh, Park, Young Suk, Lim, Ho Yeong, Kang, Won Ki
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19358705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-110
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Because treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after failure with first-line chemotherapy remains controversial, we performed this retrospective analysis based on the data obtained from 1455 patients registered in a first-line treatment cohort with respect to receiving or not receiving subsequent chemotherapy. METHODS: The decision for administering second-line chemotherapy was, in most cases, at the discretion of the physician. Seven-hundred twenty-five (50%) received second-line chemotherapy after first-line failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the recognized baseline parameters for survival. RESULTS: At the time of initiating second-line chemotherapy, the patients' median age was 56 years (range, 22 to 86) and 139 (19%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or more. Seven (1%) complete and 108 (15%) partial responses to second-line chemotherapy were observed for an overall response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 19%). The median progression-free and overall survivals, calculated from the start of second-line chemotherapy, were 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.3) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that low baseline hemoglobin level (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI 0.61–0.90) and a poor performance status (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52–0.83) were independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Performance status, along with baseline hemoglobin level, could be used to identify the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy for AGC.