Cargando…
Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load
In daily life (e.g., in the work environment) people are often distracted by stimuli that are clearly irrelevant to the current task and should be ignored. In contrast, much applied distraction research has focused on task interruptions by information that requires a response and therefore cannot be...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73 |
_version_ | 1782166463576014848 |
---|---|
author | Forster, Sophie Lavie, Nilli |
author_facet | Forster, Sophie Lavie, Nilli |
author_sort | Forster, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | In daily life (e.g., in the work environment) people are often distracted by stimuli that are clearly irrelevant to the current task and should be ignored. In contrast, much applied distraction research has focused on task interruptions by information that requires a response and therefore cannot be ignored. Moreover, the most commonly used laboratory measures of distractibility (e.g., in the response-competition and attentional-capture paradigms), typically involve distractors that are task relevant (e.g., through response associations or location). A series of experiments assessed interference effects from stimuli that are entirely unrelated to the current task, comparing the effects of perceptual load on task-irrelevant and task-relevant (response competing) distractors. The results showed that an entirely irrelevant distractor can interfere with task performance to the same extent as a response-competing distractor and that, as with other types of distractors, the interfering effects of the irrelevant distractors can be eliminated with high perceptual load in the relevant task. These findings establish a new laboratory measure of a form of distractibility common to everyday life and highlight load as an important determinant of such distractibility. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2672049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26720492009-06-04 Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load Forster, Sophie Lavie, Nilli J Exp Psychol Appl Articles In daily life (e.g., in the work environment) people are often distracted by stimuli that are clearly irrelevant to the current task and should be ignored. In contrast, much applied distraction research has focused on task interruptions by information that requires a response and therefore cannot be ignored. Moreover, the most commonly used laboratory measures of distractibility (e.g., in the response-competition and attentional-capture paradigms), typically involve distractors that are task relevant (e.g., through response associations or location). A series of experiments assessed interference effects from stimuli that are entirely unrelated to the current task, comparing the effects of perceptual load on task-irrelevant and task-relevant (response competing) distractors. The results showed that an entirely irrelevant distractor can interfere with task performance to the same extent as a response-competing distractor and that, as with other types of distractors, the interfering effects of the irrelevant distractors can be eliminated with high perceptual load in the relevant task. These findings establish a new laboratory measure of a form of distractibility common to everyday life and highlight load as an important determinant of such distractibility. American Psychological Association 2008-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2672049/ /pubmed/18377168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73 Text en © 2008 American Psychological Association. This article, manuscript, or document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association (APA). For non-commercial, education and research purposes, users may access, download, copy, display, and redistribute this article or manuscript as well as adapt, translate, or data and text mine the content contained in this document. For any such use of this document, appropriate attribution or bibliographic citation must be given. Users should not delete any copyright notices or disclaimers. For more information or to obtain permission beyond that granted here, visit http://www.apa.org/about/copyright.html. |
spellingShingle | Articles Forster, Sophie Lavie, Nilli Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title | Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title_full | Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title_fullStr | Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title_full_unstemmed | Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title_short | Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors: The Role of Load |
title_sort | failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forstersophie failurestoignoreentirelyirrelevantdistractorstheroleofload AT lavienilli failurestoignoreentirelyirrelevantdistractorstheroleofload |