Cargando…
Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy
BACKGROUND: The determination of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in skin biopsy is a useful method for the evaluation of different types of peripheral neuropathies. To allow a reliable use of the method it is necessary to determine interobserver reliability. Previous studies dealing with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-13 |
_version_ | 1782166555647279104 |
---|---|
author | Wöpking, Sigrid Scherens, Andrea Haußleiter, Ida S Richter, Helmut Schüning, Julia Klauenberg, Sabrina Maier, Christoph |
author_facet | Wöpking, Sigrid Scherens, Andrea Haußleiter, Ida S Richter, Helmut Schüning, Julia Klauenberg, Sabrina Maier, Christoph |
author_sort | Wöpking, Sigrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The determination of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in skin biopsy is a useful method for the evaluation of different types of peripheral neuropathies. To allow a reliable use of the method it is necessary to determine interobserver reliability. Previous studies dealing with this topic used limited suitable statistical methods. METHODS: In the present study three observers determined the IENFD and estimated the staining quality of the basement membrane for an adequate quantity of 120 skin biopsies (stained with indirect immunofluorescence technique) from 68 patients. More adequate statistical methods like intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland Altman Plot were chosen to estimate interobserver reliability. RESULTS: We found an unexpected significant difference in IENFD between the observers (p < 0.05) and so the results of this study are not in line with the high interobserver reliability reported before (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.73). The Bland Altmann Plot showed a variance growing with rising mean. The difference in IENFD between the observers and the resulting low interobserver reliability is likely caused by different interpretations of the standard counting rules. There was no significant difference in IENFD between observers for biopsies with a well-defined basement membrane. Thus skin biopsies with an inexactly defined basement membrane should not be used diagnostically for the determination of IENFD. CONCLUSION: These results emphasise that standardisation of the method is extremely important and at least two observers should analyse skin biopsies with critical IENFD near the cut-off values. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2672925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26729252009-04-24 Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy Wöpking, Sigrid Scherens, Andrea Haußleiter, Ida S Richter, Helmut Schüning, Julia Klauenberg, Sabrina Maier, Christoph BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: The determination of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in skin biopsy is a useful method for the evaluation of different types of peripheral neuropathies. To allow a reliable use of the method it is necessary to determine interobserver reliability. Previous studies dealing with this topic used limited suitable statistical methods. METHODS: In the present study three observers determined the IENFD and estimated the staining quality of the basement membrane for an adequate quantity of 120 skin biopsies (stained with indirect immunofluorescence technique) from 68 patients. More adequate statistical methods like intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland Altman Plot were chosen to estimate interobserver reliability. RESULTS: We found an unexpected significant difference in IENFD between the observers (p < 0.05) and so the results of this study are not in line with the high interobserver reliability reported before (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.73). The Bland Altmann Plot showed a variance growing with rising mean. The difference in IENFD between the observers and the resulting low interobserver reliability is likely caused by different interpretations of the standard counting rules. There was no significant difference in IENFD between observers for biopsies with a well-defined basement membrane. Thus skin biopsies with an inexactly defined basement membrane should not be used diagnostically for the determination of IENFD. CONCLUSION: These results emphasise that standardisation of the method is extremely important and at least two observers should analyse skin biopsies with critical IENFD near the cut-off values. BioMed Central 2009-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2672925/ /pubmed/19335896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-13 Text en Copyright © 2009 Wöpking et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wöpking, Sigrid Scherens, Andrea Haußleiter, Ida S Richter, Helmut Schüning, Julia Klauenberg, Sabrina Maier, Christoph Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title | Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title_full | Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title_fullStr | Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title_short | Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
title_sort | significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wopkingsigrid significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT scherensandrea significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT haußleiteridas significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT richterhelmut significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT schuningjulia significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT klauenbergsabrina significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy AT maierchristoph significantdifferencebetweenthreeobserversintheassessmentofintraepidermalnervefiberdensityinskinbiopsy |