Cargando…

Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis

Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphoryl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Albada, Siebe B., ten Wolde, Pieter Rein
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19424426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000378
_version_ 1782166566926811136
author van Albada, Siebe B.
ten Wolde, Pieter Rein
author_facet van Albada, Siebe B.
ten Wolde, Pieter Rein
author_sort van Albada, Siebe B.
collection PubMed
description Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphorylation level of the messenger protein CheY. Recent experiments suggest that both the kinase and the phosphatase are localized at the receptor cluster, and Vaknin and Berg recently demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the phosphatase can markedly affect the dose–response curves. We argue, using mathematical modeling, that the canonical model of the chemotaxis network cannot explain the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. We present a new model, in which a small fraction of the phosphatase is localized at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the phosphatase at the cluster has a higher binding affinity for the messenger protein and a higher catalytic activity than the phosphatase in the cytoplasm. This model is consistent with a large body of experimental data and can explain many of the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. More generally, the combination of differential affinity and catalytic activity provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals that could be exploited in other two-component signaling systems. If this model is correct, then a number of recent modeling studies, which aim to explain the chemotactic gain in terms of the activity of the receptor cluster, should be reconsidered.
format Text
id pubmed-2673030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26730302009-05-08 Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis van Albada, Siebe B. ten Wolde, Pieter Rein PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphorylation level of the messenger protein CheY. Recent experiments suggest that both the kinase and the phosphatase are localized at the receptor cluster, and Vaknin and Berg recently demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the phosphatase can markedly affect the dose–response curves. We argue, using mathematical modeling, that the canonical model of the chemotaxis network cannot explain the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. We present a new model, in which a small fraction of the phosphatase is localized at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the phosphatase at the cluster has a higher binding affinity for the messenger protein and a higher catalytic activity than the phosphatase in the cytoplasm. This model is consistent with a large body of experimental data and can explain many of the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. More generally, the combination of differential affinity and catalytic activity provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals that could be exploited in other two-component signaling systems. If this model is correct, then a number of recent modeling studies, which aim to explain the chemotactic gain in terms of the activity of the receptor cluster, should be reconsidered. Public Library of Science 2009-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2673030/ /pubmed/19424426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000378 Text en van Albada, ten Wolde. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Albada, Siebe B.
ten Wolde, Pieter Rein
Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title_full Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title_fullStr Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title_full_unstemmed Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title_short Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis
title_sort differential affinity and catalytic activity of chez in e. coli chemotaxis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19424426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000378
work_keys_str_mv AT vanalbadasiebeb differentialaffinityandcatalyticactivityofchezinecolichemotaxis
AT tenwoldepieterrein differentialaffinityandcatalyticactivityofchezinecolichemotaxis