Cargando…

Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications

BACKGROUND: Healthcare decisionmaking is a complex process relying on disparate types of evidence and value judgments. Our objectives for this study were to develop a practical framework to facilitate decisionmaking in terms of supporting the deliberative process, providing access to evidence, and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goetghebeur, Mireille M, Wagner, Monika, Khoury, Hanane, Levitt, Randy J, Erickson, Lonny J, Rindress, Donna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19102752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-270
_version_ 1782166575755821056
author Goetghebeur, Mireille M
Wagner, Monika
Khoury, Hanane
Levitt, Randy J
Erickson, Lonny J
Rindress, Donna
author_facet Goetghebeur, Mireille M
Wagner, Monika
Khoury, Hanane
Levitt, Randy J
Erickson, Lonny J
Rindress, Donna
author_sort Goetghebeur, Mireille M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare decisionmaking is a complex process relying on disparate types of evidence and value judgments. Our objectives for this study were to develop a practical framework to facilitate decisionmaking in terms of supporting the deliberative process, providing access to evidence, and enhancing the communication of decisions. METHODS: Extensive analyses of the literature and of documented decisionmaking processes around the globe were performed to explore what steps are currently used to make decisions with respect to context (from evidence generation to communication of decision) and thought process (conceptual components of decisions). Needs and methodologies available to support decisionmaking were identified to lay the groundwork for the EVIDEM framework. RESULTS: A framework was developed consisting of seven modules that can evolve over the life cycle of a healthcare intervention. Components of decision that could be quantified, i.e., intrinsic value of a healthcare intervention and quality of evidence available, were organized into matrices. A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) Value Matrix (VM) was developed to include the 15 quantifiable components that are currently considered in decisionmaking. A methodology to synthesize the evidence needed for each component of the VM was developed including electronic access to full text source documents. A Quality Matrix was designed to quantify three criteria of quality for the 12 types of evidence usually required by decisionmakers. An integrated system was developed to optimize data analysis, synthesis and validation by experts, compatible with a collaborative structure. CONCLUSION: The EVIDEM framework promotes transparent and efficient healthcare decisionmaking through systematic assessment and dissemination of the evidence and values on which decisions are based. It provides a collaborative framework that could connect all stakeholders and serve the healthcare community at local, national and international levels by allowing sharing of data, resources and values. Validation and further development is needed to explore the full potential of this approach.
format Text
id pubmed-2673218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26732182009-04-27 Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications Goetghebeur, Mireille M Wagner, Monika Khoury, Hanane Levitt, Randy J Erickson, Lonny J Rindress, Donna BMC Health Serv Res Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Healthcare decisionmaking is a complex process relying on disparate types of evidence and value judgments. Our objectives for this study were to develop a practical framework to facilitate decisionmaking in terms of supporting the deliberative process, providing access to evidence, and enhancing the communication of decisions. METHODS: Extensive analyses of the literature and of documented decisionmaking processes around the globe were performed to explore what steps are currently used to make decisions with respect to context (from evidence generation to communication of decision) and thought process (conceptual components of decisions). Needs and methodologies available to support decisionmaking were identified to lay the groundwork for the EVIDEM framework. RESULTS: A framework was developed consisting of seven modules that can evolve over the life cycle of a healthcare intervention. Components of decision that could be quantified, i.e., intrinsic value of a healthcare intervention and quality of evidence available, were organized into matrices. A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) Value Matrix (VM) was developed to include the 15 quantifiable components that are currently considered in decisionmaking. A methodology to synthesize the evidence needed for each component of the VM was developed including electronic access to full text source documents. A Quality Matrix was designed to quantify three criteria of quality for the 12 types of evidence usually required by decisionmakers. An integrated system was developed to optimize data analysis, synthesis and validation by experts, compatible with a collaborative structure. CONCLUSION: The EVIDEM framework promotes transparent and efficient healthcare decisionmaking through systematic assessment and dissemination of the evidence and values on which decisions are based. It provides a collaborative framework that could connect all stakeholders and serve the healthcare community at local, national and international levels by allowing sharing of data, resources and values. Validation and further development is needed to explore the full potential of this approach. BioMed Central 2008-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2673218/ /pubmed/19102752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-270 Text en Copyright © 2008 Goetghebeur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Goetghebeur, Mireille M
Wagner, Monika
Khoury, Hanane
Levitt, Randy J
Erickson, Lonny J
Rindress, Donna
Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title_full Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title_fullStr Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title_full_unstemmed Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title_short Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications
title_sort evidence and value: impact on decisionmaking – the evidem framework and potential applications
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19102752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-270
work_keys_str_mv AT goetghebeurmireillem evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications
AT wagnermonika evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications
AT khouryhanane evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications
AT levittrandyj evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications
AT ericksonlonnyj evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications
AT rindressdonna evidenceandvalueimpactondecisionmakingtheevidemframeworkandpotentialapplications