Cargando…

Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND: Oral glutamine decreases whole body protein breakdown in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We evaluated the functional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine in DMD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 30 ambulant DMD boys were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover trial with 2 in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mok, Elise, Letellier, Guy, Cuisset, Jean-Marie, Denjean, André, Gottrand, Frédéric, Alberti, Corinne, Hankard, Régis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19421321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005448
_version_ 1782166597982486528
author Mok, Elise
Letellier, Guy
Cuisset, Jean-Marie
Denjean, André
Gottrand, Frédéric
Alberti, Corinne
Hankard, Régis
author_facet Mok, Elise
Letellier, Guy
Cuisset, Jean-Marie
Denjean, André
Gottrand, Frédéric
Alberti, Corinne
Hankard, Régis
author_sort Mok, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral glutamine decreases whole body protein breakdown in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We evaluated the functional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine in DMD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 30 ambulant DMD boys were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover trial with 2 intervention periods: glutamine (0.5 g/kg/d) and placebo, 4 months each, separated by a 1-month wash-out, at 3 outpatient clinical investigation centers in France. Functional benefit was tested by comparing glutamine versus placebo on change in walking speed at 4 months. Secondary outcome measures were: 2-minute walk test, work, power, muscle mass (urinary creatinine), markers of myofibrillar protein breakdown (urinary 3-methyl-histidine/creatinine), serum creatine phospho-kinase, body composition (fat free mass, fat mass percentage), safety and oral nutrient intake. There was no improvement in the primary end point (walking speed) or in secondary measures of muscle function (2-minute walk test, work, power) in the glutamine group compared with placebo. However, subjects receiving glutamine or placebo showed no deterioration in functional measures over the course of the 9-month trial. No differences in muscle mass, markers of protein breakdown or serum creatine phosho-kinase were observed, except for a blunted increase in fat free mass in the glutamine group which led to a greater increase in fat mass percentage. Glutamine was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not identify additional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine over placebo on muscle mass or function in ambulatory DMD boys. Although apparently safe, current data cannot support routine supplementation in this population as a whole, until further research proves otherwise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00296621
format Text
id pubmed-2673684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26736842009-05-06 Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial Mok, Elise Letellier, Guy Cuisset, Jean-Marie Denjean, André Gottrand, Frédéric Alberti, Corinne Hankard, Régis PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Oral glutamine decreases whole body protein breakdown in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We evaluated the functional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine in DMD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 30 ambulant DMD boys were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover trial with 2 intervention periods: glutamine (0.5 g/kg/d) and placebo, 4 months each, separated by a 1-month wash-out, at 3 outpatient clinical investigation centers in France. Functional benefit was tested by comparing glutamine versus placebo on change in walking speed at 4 months. Secondary outcome measures were: 2-minute walk test, work, power, muscle mass (urinary creatinine), markers of myofibrillar protein breakdown (urinary 3-methyl-histidine/creatinine), serum creatine phospho-kinase, body composition (fat free mass, fat mass percentage), safety and oral nutrient intake. There was no improvement in the primary end point (walking speed) or in secondary measures of muscle function (2-minute walk test, work, power) in the glutamine group compared with placebo. However, subjects receiving glutamine or placebo showed no deterioration in functional measures over the course of the 9-month trial. No differences in muscle mass, markers of protein breakdown or serum creatine phosho-kinase were observed, except for a blunted increase in fat free mass in the glutamine group which led to a greater increase in fat mass percentage. Glutamine was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not identify additional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine over placebo on muscle mass or function in ambulatory DMD boys. Although apparently safe, current data cannot support routine supplementation in this population as a whole, until further research proves otherwise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00296621 Public Library of Science 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2673684/ /pubmed/19421321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005448 Text en Mok et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mok, Elise
Letellier, Guy
Cuisset, Jean-Marie
Denjean, André
Gottrand, Frédéric
Alberti, Corinne
Hankard, Régis
Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_fullStr Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_short Lack of Functional Benefit with Glutamine versus Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_sort lack of functional benefit with glutamine versus placebo in duchenne muscular dystrophy: a randomized crossover trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19421321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005448
work_keys_str_mv AT mokelise lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT letellierguy lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT cuissetjeanmarie lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT denjeanandre lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT gottrandfrederic lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT alberticorinne lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT hankardregis lackoffunctionalbenefitwithglutamineversusplaceboinduchennemusculardystrophyarandomizedcrossovertrial