Cargando…

Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation

Objective To determine the extent to which computerised decision support can improve concordance of multidisciplinary teams with therapeutic decisions recommended by guidelines. Design Multicentre cluster randomised trial. Participants Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation teams in Dutch centres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goud, Rick, de Keizer, Nicolette F, ter Riet, Gerben, Wyatt, Jeremy C, Hasman, Arie, Hellemans, Irene M, Peek, Niels
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19398471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1440
_version_ 1782166619517091840
author Goud, Rick
de Keizer, Nicolette F
ter Riet, Gerben
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Hasman, Arie
Hellemans, Irene M
Peek, Niels
author_facet Goud, Rick
de Keizer, Nicolette F
ter Riet, Gerben
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Hasman, Arie
Hellemans, Irene M
Peek, Niels
author_sort Goud, Rick
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine the extent to which computerised decision support can improve concordance of multidisciplinary teams with therapeutic decisions recommended by guidelines. Design Multicentre cluster randomised trial. Participants Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation teams in Dutch centres and their cardiac rehabilitation patients. Interventions Teams received an electronic patient record system with or without additional guideline based decision support. Main outcome measures Concordance with guideline recommendations assessed for two standard rehabilitation treatments—exercise and education therapy—and for two new but evidence based rehabilitation treatments—relaxation and lifestyle change therapy; generalised estimating equations were used to account for intra-cluster correlation and were adjusted for patient’s age, sex, and indication for cardiac rehabilitation and for type and volume of centre. Results Data from 21 centres, including 2787 patients, were analysed. Computerised decision support increased concordance with guideline recommended therapeutic decisions for exercise therapy by 7.9% (control 84.7%; adjusted difference 3.5%, 95% confidence 0.1% to 5.2%), for education therapy by 25.7% (control 63.9%; adjusted difference 23.7%, 15.5% to 29.4%), and for relaxation therapy by 25.5% (control 34.1%; adjusted difference 41.6%, 25.2% to 51.3%). The concordance for lifestyle change therapy increased by 3.2% (control 54.1%; adjusted difference 7.1%, −2.9% to 18.3%). Computerised decision support reduced cases of both overtreatment and undertreatment. Conclusions In a multidisciplinary team motivated to adopt a computerised decision support aid that assists in formulating guideline based care plans, computerised decision support can be effective in improving the team’s concordance with guidelines. Therefore, computerised decision support may also be considered to improve implementation of guidelines in such settings. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36656997.
format Text
id pubmed-2674147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26741472009-04-29 Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation Goud, Rick de Keizer, Nicolette F ter Riet, Gerben Wyatt, Jeremy C Hasman, Arie Hellemans, Irene M Peek, Niels BMJ Research Objective To determine the extent to which computerised decision support can improve concordance of multidisciplinary teams with therapeutic decisions recommended by guidelines. Design Multicentre cluster randomised trial. Participants Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation teams in Dutch centres and their cardiac rehabilitation patients. Interventions Teams received an electronic patient record system with or without additional guideline based decision support. Main outcome measures Concordance with guideline recommendations assessed for two standard rehabilitation treatments—exercise and education therapy—and for two new but evidence based rehabilitation treatments—relaxation and lifestyle change therapy; generalised estimating equations were used to account for intra-cluster correlation and were adjusted for patient’s age, sex, and indication for cardiac rehabilitation and for type and volume of centre. Results Data from 21 centres, including 2787 patients, were analysed. Computerised decision support increased concordance with guideline recommended therapeutic decisions for exercise therapy by 7.9% (control 84.7%; adjusted difference 3.5%, 95% confidence 0.1% to 5.2%), for education therapy by 25.7% (control 63.9%; adjusted difference 23.7%, 15.5% to 29.4%), and for relaxation therapy by 25.5% (control 34.1%; adjusted difference 41.6%, 25.2% to 51.3%). The concordance for lifestyle change therapy increased by 3.2% (control 54.1%; adjusted difference 7.1%, −2.9% to 18.3%). Computerised decision support reduced cases of both overtreatment and undertreatment. Conclusions In a multidisciplinary team motivated to adopt a computerised decision support aid that assists in formulating guideline based care plans, computerised decision support can be effective in improving the team’s concordance with guidelines. Therefore, computerised decision support may also be considered to improve implementation of guidelines in such settings. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36656997. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2674147/ /pubmed/19398471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1440 Text en © Goud et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Goud, Rick
de Keizer, Nicolette F
ter Riet, Gerben
Wyatt, Jeremy C
Hasman, Arie
Hellemans, Irene M
Peek, Niels
Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title_full Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title_fullStr Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title_short Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
title_sort effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19398471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1440
work_keys_str_mv AT goudrick effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT dekeizernicolettef effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT terrietgerben effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT wyattjeremyc effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT hasmanarie effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT hellemansirenem effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation
AT peekniels effectofguidelinebasedcomputeriseddecisionsupportondecisionmakingofmultidisciplinaryteamsclusterrandomisedtrialincardiacrehabilitation