Cargando…

Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes considerable disability and often results in loss of work capacity and productivity. This study evaluated the impact of adalimumab, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in RA, on long-term employment. METHODS: Data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halpern, M T, Cifaldi, M A, Kvien, T K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18829616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092734
_version_ 1782166648510218240
author Halpern, M T
Cifaldi, M A
Kvien, T K
author_facet Halpern, M T
Cifaldi, M A
Kvien, T K
author_sort Halpern, M T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes considerable disability and often results in loss of work capacity and productivity. This study evaluated the impact of adalimumab, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in RA, on long-term employment. METHODS: Data from an open-label extension study (DE033) of 486 RA patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy who previously did not respond to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and had baseline work status information were compared with data from 747 RA patients receiving DMARD treatment in a Norway-based longitudinal registry. Primary outcomes included the time patients continued working at least part time and the likelihood of stopping work. Secondary outcomes included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses and disease remission. Outcomes were compared 6, 12 and 24 months after enrolment. RESULTS: During a 24-month period, the 158 patients who received adalimumab and were working at baseline worked 7.32 months longer (95% CI 4.8 to 9.1) than did the 180 patients treated with DMARDs, controlling for differences in baseline characteristics. Regardless of baseline work status, patients receiving adalimumab worked 2.0 months longer (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6) and were significantly less likely to stop working than those receiving DMARDs (HR 0.36 (95% CI −0.30 to 0.42) for all patients and 0.36 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.85) for patients working at baseline, respectively). The patients who received adalimumab were also considerably more likely to achieve ACR responses and disease remission than DMARD-treated patients. Patients who achieved EULAR good response and remission were less likely to stop working, but this relationship was only seen in patients receiving DMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA who received adalimumab experienced considerably longer periods of work and continuous employment, and greater rates of clinical responses, than patients receiving DMARDs. The mechanism by which adalimumab decreases likelihood of stopping work seems to be different from that of DMARD treatment and independent of clinical responses.
format Text
id pubmed-2674552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26745522009-04-29 Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group Halpern, M T Cifaldi, M A Kvien, T K Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes considerable disability and often results in loss of work capacity and productivity. This study evaluated the impact of adalimumab, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in RA, on long-term employment. METHODS: Data from an open-label extension study (DE033) of 486 RA patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy who previously did not respond to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and had baseline work status information were compared with data from 747 RA patients receiving DMARD treatment in a Norway-based longitudinal registry. Primary outcomes included the time patients continued working at least part time and the likelihood of stopping work. Secondary outcomes included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses and disease remission. Outcomes were compared 6, 12 and 24 months after enrolment. RESULTS: During a 24-month period, the 158 patients who received adalimumab and were working at baseline worked 7.32 months longer (95% CI 4.8 to 9.1) than did the 180 patients treated with DMARDs, controlling for differences in baseline characteristics. Regardless of baseline work status, patients receiving adalimumab worked 2.0 months longer (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6) and were significantly less likely to stop working than those receiving DMARDs (HR 0.36 (95% CI −0.30 to 0.42) for all patients and 0.36 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.85) for patients working at baseline, respectively). The patients who received adalimumab were also considerably more likely to achieve ACR responses and disease remission than DMARD-treated patients. Patients who achieved EULAR good response and remission were less likely to stop working, but this relationship was only seen in patients receiving DMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA who received adalimumab experienced considerably longer periods of work and continuous employment, and greater rates of clinical responses, than patients receiving DMARDs. The mechanism by which adalimumab decreases likelihood of stopping work seems to be different from that of DMARD treatment and independent of clinical responses. BMJ Publishing Group 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2674552/ /pubmed/18829616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092734 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Halpern, M T
Cifaldi, M A
Kvien, T K
Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title_full Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title_fullStr Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title_full_unstemmed Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title_short Impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
title_sort impact of adalimumab on work participation in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of an open-label extension study and a registry-based control group
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18829616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092734
work_keys_str_mv AT halpernmt impactofadalimumabonworkparticipationinrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonofanopenlabelextensionstudyandaregistrybasedcontrolgroup
AT cifaldima impactofadalimumabonworkparticipationinrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonofanopenlabelextensionstudyandaregistrybasedcontrolgroup
AT kvientk impactofadalimumabonworkparticipationinrheumatoidarthritiscomparisonofanopenlabelextensionstudyandaregistrybasedcontrolgroup