Cargando…

Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication

Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megens, Hendrik-Jan, Crooijmans, Richard PMA, Cristobal, Magali San, Hui, Xiao, Li, Ning, Groenen, Martien AM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103
_version_ 1782166678789947392
author Megens, Hendrik-Jan
Crooijmans, Richard PMA
Cristobal, Magali San
Hui, Xiao
Li, Ning
Groenen, Martien AM
author_facet Megens, Hendrik-Jan
Crooijmans, Richard PMA
Cristobal, Magali San
Hui, Xiao
Li, Ning
Groenen, Martien AM
author_sort Megens, Hendrik-Jan
collection PubMed
description Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, although a southern European and English group could tentatively be assigned. Populations from international breeds formed breed specific clusters. The Chinese breeds formed a second major group, with the Sino-European synthetic Tia Meslan in-between the two large clusters. Within Chinese breeds, in contrast to the European pigs, a large degree of geographic structure was noted, in line with previous classification schemes for Chinese pigs that were based on morphology and geography. The Northern Chinese breeds were most similar to the European breeds. Although some overlap exists, Chinese breeds showed a higher average degree of heterozygosity and genetic distance compared to European ones. Between breed diversity was even more pronounced and was the highest in the Central Chinese pigs, reflecting the geographically central position in China. Comparing correlations between genetic distance and heterozygosity revealed that China and Europe represent different domestication or breed formation processes. A likely cause is a more diverse wild boar population in Asia, but various other possible contributing factors are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2674914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26749142009-04-30 Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication Megens, Hendrik-Jan Crooijmans, Richard PMA Cristobal, Magali San Hui, Xiao Li, Ning Groenen, Martien AM Genet Sel Evol Research Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, although a southern European and English group could tentatively be assigned. Populations from international breeds formed breed specific clusters. The Chinese breeds formed a second major group, with the Sino-European synthetic Tia Meslan in-between the two large clusters. Within Chinese breeds, in contrast to the European pigs, a large degree of geographic structure was noted, in line with previous classification schemes for Chinese pigs that were based on morphology and geography. The Northern Chinese breeds were most similar to the European breeds. Although some overlap exists, Chinese breeds showed a higher average degree of heterozygosity and genetic distance compared to European ones. Between breed diversity was even more pronounced and was the highest in the Central Chinese pigs, reflecting the geographically central position in China. Comparing correlations between genetic distance and heterozygosity revealed that China and Europe represent different domestication or breed formation processes. A likely cause is a more diverse wild boar population in Asia, but various other possible contributing factors are discussed. BioMed Central 2008-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2674914/ /pubmed/18096118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103 Text en Copyright © 2008 INRA, EDP Sciences
spellingShingle Research
Megens, Hendrik-Jan
Crooijmans, Richard PMA
Cristobal, Magali San
Hui, Xiao
Li, Ning
Groenen, Martien AM
Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title_full Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title_fullStr Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title_short Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
title_sort biodiversity of pig breeds from china and europe estimated from pooled dna samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103
work_keys_str_mv AT megenshendrikjan biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication
AT crooijmansrichardpma biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication
AT cristobalmagalisan biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication
AT huixiao biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication
AT lining biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication
AT groenenmartienam biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication