Cargando…
Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication
Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103 |
_version_ | 1782166678789947392 |
---|---|
author | Megens, Hendrik-Jan Crooijmans, Richard PMA Cristobal, Magali San Hui, Xiao Li, Ning Groenen, Martien AM |
author_facet | Megens, Hendrik-Jan Crooijmans, Richard PMA Cristobal, Magali San Hui, Xiao Li, Ning Groenen, Martien AM |
author_sort | Megens, Hendrik-Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, although a southern European and English group could tentatively be assigned. Populations from international breeds formed breed specific clusters. The Chinese breeds formed a second major group, with the Sino-European synthetic Tia Meslan in-between the two large clusters. Within Chinese breeds, in contrast to the European pigs, a large degree of geographic structure was noted, in line with previous classification schemes for Chinese pigs that were based on morphology and geography. The Northern Chinese breeds were most similar to the European breeds. Although some overlap exists, Chinese breeds showed a higher average degree of heterozygosity and genetic distance compared to European ones. Between breed diversity was even more pronounced and was the highest in the Central Chinese pigs, reflecting the geographically central position in China. Comparing correlations between genetic distance and heterozygosity revealed that China and Europe represent different domestication or breed formation processes. A likely cause is a more diverse wild boar population in Asia, but various other possible contributing factors are discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2674914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26749142009-04-30 Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication Megens, Hendrik-Jan Crooijmans, Richard PMA Cristobal, Magali San Hui, Xiao Li, Ning Groenen, Martien AM Genet Sel Evol Research Microsatellite diversity in European and Chinese pigs was assessed using a pooled sampling method on 52 European and 46 Chinese pig populations. A Neighbor Joining analysis on genetic distances revealed that European breeds were grouped together and showed little evidence for geographic structure, although a southern European and English group could tentatively be assigned. Populations from international breeds formed breed specific clusters. The Chinese breeds formed a second major group, with the Sino-European synthetic Tia Meslan in-between the two large clusters. Within Chinese breeds, in contrast to the European pigs, a large degree of geographic structure was noted, in line with previous classification schemes for Chinese pigs that were based on morphology and geography. The Northern Chinese breeds were most similar to the European breeds. Although some overlap exists, Chinese breeds showed a higher average degree of heterozygosity and genetic distance compared to European ones. Between breed diversity was even more pronounced and was the highest in the Central Chinese pigs, reflecting the geographically central position in China. Comparing correlations between genetic distance and heterozygosity revealed that China and Europe represent different domestication or breed formation processes. A likely cause is a more diverse wild boar population in Asia, but various other possible contributing factors are discussed. BioMed Central 2008-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2674914/ /pubmed/18096118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103 Text en Copyright © 2008 INRA, EDP Sciences |
spellingShingle | Research Megens, Hendrik-Jan Crooijmans, Richard PMA Cristobal, Magali San Hui, Xiao Li, Ning Groenen, Martien AM Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title | Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title_full | Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title_fullStr | Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title_full_unstemmed | Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title_short | Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
title_sort | biodiversity of pig breeds from china and europe estimated from pooled dna samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-1-103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT megenshendrikjan biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication AT crooijmansrichardpma biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication AT cristobalmagalisan biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication AT huixiao biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication AT lining biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication AT groenenmartienam biodiversityofpigbreedsfromchinaandeuropeestimatedfrompooleddnasamplesdifferencesinmicrosatellitevariationbetweentwoareasofdomestication |